- 固定收益投資組合經理
香港, 個人投資者
切換至其他網站
本刊所載見解反映作者於撰文時的觀點，其他團隊可能觀點各異，或會作出不同的投資決策。閣下投資的價值可能高於或低於初始投資時的水平。本刊所載第三方數據被視為可靠，惟概不保證其準確性。
僅提供英文版本
An inverted US Treasury yield curve is often viewed as a reliable recession indicator, so the significant flattening of the curve over the past few months — and in an environment of persistent inflationary pressures, to boot — has some economic prognosticators calling for an impending US recession. I say not so fast.
While I acknowledge that the economic outlook will likely deteriorate at the margin as monetary policy tightens, particularly if energy prices remain elevated, I do not believe the recent flattening of the yield curve portends a US recession in the near term. US consumer balance sheets look very healthy, household savings rates are robust, and rising worker wages may help cushion against the impact of higher goods and energy prices. Furthermore, the US should remain relatively shielded from today's uncertain geopolitical landscape, given its lower oil imports from Russia and its greater domestic oil production compared to Europe.
What's driving recent yield curve flattening?
The recent flattening (and inversion) between the two-year and 10-year parts of the yield curve has been primarily driven by the increase in short-term yields following the more aggressive policy tightening stance adopted by the US Federal Reserve (Fed) in response to stubborn inflationary pressures. Yet the three-month and 10-year "shape" of the curve — historically a more reliable recession indicator — still has a ways to go before inverting, given that the Fed has only just begun to hike the fed funds rate (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Central bank-induced recession not imminent
The Fed intends to tighten financial conditions in an effort to alleviate the effects of higher inflation, but it will likely be mindful of the attendant risks to the economic cycle. Specifically, I expect the Fed to remain keenly cognizant of the danger of tightening policy too aggressively against a backdrop of heightened geopolitical tensions. This type of measured approach should further contribute to the "stickiness" of inflation and could raise the odds of a stagflationary outcome (i.e., high inflation in tandem with slowing growth).
That being said, I think a lot would need to go wrong in order for US economic growth to contract in the period ahead. All else being equal, it would likely take one to two years of steady Fed interest-rate hikes for tighter monetary policy to tip the US economy into recession. Projections by the Fed and futures markets have the policy rate increasing to 2.8% and 2.6%, respectively, by the end of 2023 — only slightly above the neutral rate and not overly restrictive, in my view.
Some sectors may benefit from higher inflation
While inflation can indeed erode the returns provided by traditional high-grade, rate-sensitive fixed income assets, I believe a number of bond sectors can prove resilient and even be net beneficiaries of higher inflation, including persistently elevated energy prices.
Obvious choices for sectors that can potentially benefit from inflation include bank loans (given the floating-rate nature of their coupons, which reset higher as interest rates rise) and Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, aka TIPS (since their coupons are directly indexed to, and thus protected from, inflation). I also expect high-yield corporates, convertible bonds, securitized credit, and emerging markets (EM) local debt to outperform most traditional high-grade fixed income sectors in a rising-rate/high-inflation environment, particularly if the global economic expansion continues throughout 2022 and beyond. Some points to consider:
- Floating-rate bank loans, high-yield corporates, and convertible bonds have actually exhibited flat to negative empirical durations over time, meaning these credit sectors have historically generated positive total returns during periods of rising US Treasury yields.
- Within structured finance, non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) stand out, where solid fundamentals remain intact and the collateral typically benefits from rising home prices, which I expect to persist amid scant supply.
- For similar reasons, inflation also tends to favor commercial real estate, although not all property types are created equal. We currently see the best opportunities in single-asset, single-borrower deals.
- EM debt remains vulnerable to geopolitical flare-ups, but many local markets are under-owned by foreign investors. EM central banks are well ahead of the Fed in hiking rates to help blunt inflation, while high commodity prices are a boon to some EM commodity exporters.
Bottom line: Be opportunistic in the credit markets
While my outlook for the US credit cycle has worsened somewhat on the back of tighter financial conditions and significant inflationary pressures, I still do not believe a central bank-induced recession is around the corner. I am seeing plenty of investment opportunities in today's environment in spite of — in fact, because of — the high levels of economic uncertainty and market volatility that have characterized 2022 so far.
投資專家
相關見解
顯示
of
投資見解文章
參考網站連結
相關投資見解
推薦閱讀
顯示
of
投資見解文章
投資債券的理據：
何以現金只是權宜之計
投資債券長遠而言比持有現金吸引？兩位專家環球投資策略師Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson及投資策略分析師Patrick Wattiau就以上議題分享見解。
速覽
2024-08-31
美國衰退風險：
從「會否」轉為關注
「何時及如何」發生
投資組合經理Brij Khurana、Brian Garvey及Nick Petrucelli認為，不少觀察人員均低估美國今年可能出現經濟衰退的嚴重性。（僅提供英文版本）
速覽
2024-01-31
環球可換股債券：
五大結構利好因素
五大結構利好因素
固定收益投資組合經理Michael Barry及投資專家Raina Dunkelberger認為，環球可換股債券可望於未來兩三年跑贏其他固定收益資產。即看內文了解箇中原因。（僅提供英文版本）
繼續閱讀
速覽
2023-04-21
威觀聯儲局：2022年鷹聲嘹亮？
近期通脹升溫，市場目光似乎集中於聯儲局之上。固定收益投資組合經理Jeremy Forster於本文分享其對2021年12月聯邦公開市場委員會會議的見解。
繼續閱讀
2022-12-31
參考網站連結
相關投資見解
重要披露
在未有威靈頓投資管理明確書面批准的情況下，概不可複製或轉載本刊全部或任何部分內容。本文件僅供參考之用，並非任何人士要約或邀請認購威靈頓投資管理（盧森堡）SICAV基金III系列的股份。本文件所載資料不應被視為投資建議，亦非買賣任何股份之推介。基金投資不一定適合所有投資者。所載見解反映作者於撰文時的觀點，可予更改而不作另行通知。投資者於作出投資決定前，務請細閱基金及子基金的產品資料概要、基金招股章程及香港說明文件，以了解詳情（包括風險因素），其他有關文件包括年度及半年度財務報告。
由威靈頓管理香港有限公司刊發。投資涉及風險。過去業績並不代表將來表現。本文件未經香港證券及期貨事務監察委員會審閱。
