- Fixed Income Portfolio Manager
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Insights
- Capabilities
- About Us
- My Account
United States, Institutional
Changechevron_rightThank you for your registration
You will shortly receive an email with your unique link to our preference center.
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional or accredited investors only.
“I don’t see the ‘stag’ or the ‘-flation,’ actually.” — Jerome Powell, 1 May 2024.
At the Federal Open Market Committee press conference in May of last year, US Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Powell was asked about the risk of stagflation, and the above quote was his reply. He was right to dismiss those concerns at the time. Real GDP has since grown by approximately 2%, while core inflation has fallen from 3.6% to 2.9%.1 While that data doesn’t suggest stagflation, other recent economic indicators (detailed below) signal the rising risk of just such a scenario. In my view, it may be time for investors to consider increasing their allocation to assets that help hedge their portfolios against stagflation.
For the last few years, I have been skeptical that inflation would reaccelerate. My optimism was because the US money supply had been growing far less than nominal GDP, thanks to the Fed’s quantitative tightening (QT) program. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Fed’s actions, combined with the government’s stimulus measures, increased the US money supply, which contributed to inflation. When the monetary stimulus was removed, inflation subsequently fell.
Two significant changes have occurred since then. First, the Fed substantially reduced its QT program in March 2025, decreasing the Treasury runoff from US$25 billion per month to just US$5 billion per month.2 As a result, the economy’s money supply is growing again, heightening the risk of accelerating inflation. Second, the US dollar has weakened. As the world’s reserve currency and the denomination for trade in commodities and a wide range of goods, a decline in the dollar’s value increases money supply outside the US.
Why does this matter?
Say the Bank of Japan suddenly decided to double the amount of outstanding yen, but the currency depreciated 50% relative to the US dollar. Japan’s purchasing power for commodities and goods would not have improved, and there would be minor impact on global inflation, given the dearth of yen-adjusted demand for goods outside of Japan. In contrast, a depreciating US dollar boosts ex-US money supply, enabling other countries to buy more goods in dollar terms with their own currencies. More money chasing goods is a formula for inflation. According to my calculations, in 2Q24, global money supply in US-dollar terms grew by about 2% year over year, well below the global growth rate. Today, the supply of money is increasing by nearly 7.8%, representing a key inflationary risk.
The August 1 US payroll report indicated that the US labor market is slowing. Private payroll growth has decelerated to its lowest level since the pandemic.3 The weakening in labor demand is offset by a parallel reduction in labor supply, due to immigration policies and an aging US workforce. This combination of factors has meant that despite slow job growth, US unemployment remains very low, at 4.2% as of this writing.
At his most recent press conference, Chair Powell implied that given the Fed’s dual mandate (to maintain maximum employment consistent with stable prices), a low unemployment rate — even if it is because of less supply — indicates a labor market in balance. I believe this view is a hawkish mistake. Less demand for labor, regardless of the amount of labor supply, still represents less economy-wide income, which is itself a threat to growth.
In my August article (also published in Financial Times), I argued that the Fed should focus on lowering policy rates to support the economy’s more interest-rate-sensitive segments, while maintaining a QT approach that slows money supply growth and inflation. Instead, the Fed is more likely to end QT completely and only gradually lower the policy rate in response to the low unemployment rate.
For asset allocators, a stagflationary environment is extremely challenging. Bond values generally decline amid inflation, and stocks tend to struggle given heightened macro volatility. There is one potentially effective category of assets to consider, however. Inflation-linked bonds, whose principal increases with inflation — thus preserving their real value — can help asset allocators hedge against stagflation.
The market-implied yield on 10-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) a decade from now is 3.2% (Figure 1). This is the highest level of real (inflation-adjusted) yields since the early 2000s when the TIPS market was first created and investors considered them a cheap novelty. Given the inflation protection that TIPS represent, allocators may want to consider increasing their exposure today.
While gold is also traditionally considered a hedge against inflation (or stagflation), its recent appreciation indicates that this premium may already be included in its price. Inflation-linked bonds, however — particularly longer-dated securities — have underperformed other real assets over the past few years, bolstering their potential for long-term upside.
Today, I see signs of both the “stag” and “-flation.” Although asset allocators have few options for protecting their portfolios, TIPS are a potential solution to consider.
Figure 1
1Bureau of Economic Analysis; U.S. Bureau for Labor Statistics.
2FOMC communications related to policy normalization, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 11 April 2025 update.
3U.S. Bureau for Labor Statistics.
Expert
Long bonds could become a diversifier once again
Continue readingBy
Rethinking the Fed’s dual mandate
Continue readingBy
Why the US dollar’s “crooked smile” could upend asset allocation
Continue readingBy
Sacrificing stocks on the altar of trade
Continue readingBy
Deeply seeking the impact of AI spending on bond yields
Continue readingBy
What an “America first” foreign policy may mean for markets
Continue readingBy
What is “the economic cycle,” anyway?
Continue readingBy
URL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
Thank you for your registration
You will shortly receive an email with your unique link to our preference center
Long bonds could become a diversifier once again
Despite a challenging 15 years, long bonds represent a valuation opportunity. Brij Khurana explains why long-term yields may not last, offering asset allocators a reason to rethink the diversification potential of long-maturity bonds.
By
Rethinking the Fed’s dual mandate
Is it time for a fresh perspective on the dual mandate? Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Brij Khurana explores the potential benefits of reorienting monetary policy toward maximizing productivity.
By
Why the US dollar’s “crooked smile” could upend asset allocation
Brij Khurana explores the dollar smile theory's impact on asset allocation and foreign investors' strategies amid currency fluctuations.
By
Sacrificing stocks on the altar of trade
Brij Khurana discusses the Trump administration's new stance on trade and its impact on the US economy, global markets and asset prices.
By
Deeply seeking the impact of AI spending on bond yields
Brij Khurana explores the surprising way in which AI spending may impact Treasury yields and complicate the Fed's rate-policy decisions.
By
What an “America first” foreign policy may mean for markets
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Brij Khurana explores the potential market impacts of President Trump's "America first" foreign policy. From regional hegemony to global economic dominance to tariffs applied for strategic geopolitical gain, discover how these shifts could affect investors.
By
What is “the economic cycle,” anyway?
See why the relationship between asset prices and the economic cycle is more complex than you might think, why a US recession is unlikely, and what a more dovish Fed could mean for the US and global markets.
By
What the yen carry trade unwind could mean for markets and the Fed
Brij Khurana explains why market participants are likely underestimating how foreign ownership of US assets could constrain the pace and magnitude of the Fed’s cutting cycle.
By
Walking a mile in Fed Chair Powell’s shoes
A slow roll on rate cuts by the Fed could frustrate markets and lead to more volatility ahead of the September FOMC meeting. See our take on what to expect for the next few weeks.
By
Ok, Boomer: How US generational wealth distribution could upend the economy and markets
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Brij Khurana discusses the implications of US Baby Boomers' wealth concentration in the event of a market decline.
By
URL References
Related Insights
© Copyright 2025 Wellington Management Company LLP. All rights reserved. WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT ® is a registered service mark of Wellington Group Holdings LLP. For institutional or professional investors only.
Enjoying this content?
Get similar insights delivered straight to your inbox. Simply choose what you’re interested in and we’ll bring you our best research and market perspectives.
Thank you for joining our email preference center.
You’ll soon receive an email with a link to access and update your preferences.
The real issue on rate cuts? Keep your eyes on the dot (plot)
Keep your eyes on the Fed's 2025 dot plot. The real story is where policy rates are headed, not just the next rate cut.
By