- Fixed Income Portfolio Manager
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Insights
- Capabilities
- About Us
- My Account
United States, Institutional
Changechevron_rightThank you for your registration
You will shortly receive an email with your unique link to our preference center.
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
Not all smiles are straight. Some bend under the weight of what they’ve seen.
The Dollar Smile Theory posits that the world’s reserve currency tends to appreciate both when the US economy is weak (as investors take flight to quality) and when it is strong (as investors become optimistic about US growth). The theory also holds that the dollar weakens in the middle part of the distribution (the bottom of the smile) when US growth moderates relative to the rest of the world (Figure 1). During April 2025, when volatility gripped markets amid tariff concerns, the USD sold off even as stocks plunged, and odds of a US recession rose. To understand why the theory did not hold and what it means for markets from here, it is worth considering the perspective of foreign (ex-US) asset allocators.
Figure 1
The US dollar's "smile"
As I have noted previously, over the past 15 years, foreign ownership of US assets has increased dramatically to around US$26 trillion, or 88% of GDP,1 largely owing to US asset-price performance that has dwarfed that of most nations, coupled with very strong dollar appreciation. This experience has conditioned foreign investors to leave sizable portions of their US assets unhedged, meaning they lose money if their home currency appreciates against the US dollar. Foreign allocators tend to hedge their US bond holdings more than their stock holdings, because fixed income volatility is lower, and bondholders can substitute a variety of credit instruments to offset the cost of currency hedging.
Throughout April, bond yields rose due to fears of foreign selling, but since positions were largely currency hedged, this did not happen. There was, however, persistent foreign selling of US dollars, even after the Trump administration slashed its previously announced tariffs for most countries. This makes sense. These investors were experiencing losses on their unhedged stock portfolios at the same time their currencies were appreciating against the dollar. When a position goes against you, you can either hedge or sell the asset. Not surprisingly, most foreign investors chose to hedge their currency risk first, given President Trump’s seeming preference for a weaker dollar and investors’ reluctance to realize big losses on their stock portfolios.
As I write this in mid-May, the stock market has recovered, and it is now much more likely that foreigners will use this strength to reduce their US stock allocations and remove some of their unhedged currency risk. Let’s look closer at those potential sellers and the ramifications for US markets. Since early April, the currencies that have appreciated the most are countries with the largest positive net international positions (i.e., they own assets abroad). These include Switzerland, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. At the same time, Norway, Canada, and Australia (among others) have multi-trillion-dollar US equity markets holdings — largely unhedged — through their pension systems. If these countries start taking profits on their US holdings and/or further hedge their currency risk by selling USD and buying domestic currencies, then a dampening effect on the upside potential for US equity prices is very possible.
In 2022, when the negative correlation between bond and stock returns became dislocated, many asset allocators sought new sources of diversification, moving into gold or bitcoin and out of bonds to hedge their portfolios. Following the dollar’s recent decline during an intense risk-off episode, I believe that many non-US allocators will do something similar, diversifying their US equity exposure by turning toward their home markets and other global assets.
Since 2010, there has been a bear market in international diversification, with US stocks outperforming the rest of the world by close to 300%.2 The dollar’s crooked smile might reverse this trend and reshape the flow of international investment capital.
1 Bureau of Economic Analysis. | 2 Bloomberg.
Expert
Private credit outlook for 2026: 5 key trends
Continue readingAre hedge funds the missing ingredient?
Continue readingIs all that glitters still gold?
Continue readingThe alpha advantage: Building retirement resilience
Continue readingLong bonds could become a diversifier once again
Continue readingBy
Chart in Focus: Are today’s equity returns too high?
Continue readingCLO equity’s role in asset allocation
Continue readingURL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
Thank you for your registration
You will shortly receive an email with your unique link to our preference center
Private credit outlook for 2026: 5 key trends
Our private credit experts discuss five themes driving the asset class’s 2026 outlook, including public/private convergence, changing credit profiles, the growth of retail, and much more.
Are hedge funds the missing ingredient?
Inflation, volatility, and valuations — they all raise questions about portfolio diversification and resilience. Multi-Asset Strategists Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson and Adam Berger explain why multi-strategy and equity long/short hedge funds could provide the answers. They offer insights on adding allocations to a traditional portfolio mix and a recipe for manager selection.
Is all that glitters still gold?
Gold has delivered impressive gains thus far in 2025, but what does that say about market risks and the recent strong returns of stocks? Multi-Asset Strategist Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson offers her take on the precious metal and the case for diversification in today’s market.
The alpha advantage: Building retirement resilience
Client Portfolio Manager Dáire Dunne explains why the time horizon of retirement savers is well aligned with the potential of active management to deliver alpha. He examines the growing need for alpha, the importance of market inefficiency when pursuing it, and steps plan sponsors can take to help participants maximize the alpha advantage.
Long bonds could become a diversifier once again
Despite a challenging 15 years, long bonds represent a valuation opportunity. Brij Khurana explains why long-term yields may not last, offering asset allocators a reason to rethink the diversification potential of long-maturity bonds.
By
Chart in Focus: Are today’s equity returns too high?
In this edition of Chart in Focus, we examine the strength of markets so far this year, placing it in historical context.
CLO equity’s role in asset allocation
We discuss CLO equity's role in asset allocation, highlighting its potential income and diversification benefits. In addition, we explore its potential fit alongside private equity, private credit, and public equity allocations.
Two key questions that bond investors should not ignore
Investment Directors Amar Reganti and Marco Giordano and Portfolio Manager Campe Goodman tackle two key questions that are likely to be top of bond investors’ minds during the second half of 2025.
Multiple authors
Deep dive on CLO equity investing
Alyssa Irving, Fixed Income Portfolio Manager, discusses the CLO equity asset class, highlighting its diversification potential, risk-return dynamics, and the crucial role of managers.
Return-seeking fixed income for an uncertain age?
Raina Dunkelberger discusses the role of flexible, return-seeking fixed income strategies against a backdrop of concentrated equity markets and global policy divergence.
Chart in Focus: Is the “Trump trade” real?
Is this "Trump trade" real?In this latest edition of Chart in Focus, we compare market's reactions to Trump's re-election and his 2016 election, and share our observations.
Multiple authors
URL References
Related Insights
© Copyright 2025 Wellington Management Company LLP. All rights reserved. WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT ® is a registered service mark of Wellington Group Holdings LLP. For institutional or professional investors only.
Enjoying this content?
Get similar insights delivered straight to your inbox. Simply choose what you’re interested in and we’ll bring you our best research and market perspectives.
Thank you for joining our email preference center.
You’ll soon receive an email with a link to access and update your preferences.