- Fixed Income Portfolio Manager
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Insights
- Capabilities
- About Us
- My Account
United States, Institutional
Changechevron_rightThank you for your registration
You will shortly receive an email with your unique link to our preference center.
The views expressed are those of the authors at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
While there is no shortage of higher-yielding and complex instruments available across fixed income markets, we believe US Treasuries constitute a critical component of a fixed income portfolio for structural reasons. Due to their stability relative to other fixed income instruments, US Treasuries can serve as both a hedge against credit exposure and an effective source of liquidity. This may be especially useful in times of volatility when they trade more easily than credit instruments.
During such times, market participants tend to flock to safe-haven assets and the demand for US Treasuries tends to spike. This said, we believe the time to consider Treasuries is before volatility strikes. If fixed income portfolios already hold US Treasuries when negative market events occur, investors may be able to dynamically rotate their allocations and beat the rush out of credit into Treasuries and transact at potentially more attractive levels on both sides of the trade.
With many reasons to believe 2025 may be a volatile year, now may be a good time for investors to consider the role of US Treasuries in their fixed income portfolios. The asset class represents the most abundant fixed income security in global bond markets, with more than US$19 trillion outstanding as of the end of 2024.1
Regarding US Treasuries, duration is a key consideration. Compared to a year ago, market conditions have improved for Treasuries with five-to-ten-year duration. In our view, structurally, five-to-ten-year Treasuries offer a potentially compelling opportunity for risk-adjusted total return compared to both shorter and longer durations. With shorter durations, investors face the risk of underestimating price volatility. And longer durations involve more risk because they’re more sensitive to changes in interest rates and inflation expectations, for example.
In late 2023, policy rates were higher, and the yield curve was flatter. So, it was challenging to include US Treasuries in a fixed income portfolio because extending beyond short durations didn’t offer much benefit to investors.
But now, policy rates have come down, and those previously unattractive Treasuries with longer, five-to-ten-year durations, look more attractive. Due to our belief that Treasuries with these mid-range durations tend to have a more optimal balance of yield and duration, and market conditions are favorable now and in our near/mid-term outlook, we don’t feel the need to extend duration further.
In our view, US Treasuries are important to fixed income portfolios because they’re more liquid than other types of fixed income, so they can potentially help hedge against credit risk and provide investors with dry powder to deploy when volatility creates attractive income and capital appreciation opportunities. Currently, market conditions are conducive to potentially attractive performance among five-to-ten-year Treasuries from a total return versus risk standpoint.
There’s a strong case to be made for the asset class, which investors may be able to access effectively through active management, rather than passive. If investors separate themselves from a benchmark, they could be better positioned to rotate their allocations dynamically, shifting between Treasuries and other types of fixed income as needed, thus seeking to exploit price inefficiencies and generate income.
1“U.S. Treasury Monthly Statement of the Public Debt (MSPD),” FiscalData.Treasury.gov, 2025.
Experts
Flexibility with focus: how to position fixed income for volatility
Continue readingUS debt dynamics: Is there a path to sustainability?
Continue readingDeeply seeking the impact of AI spending on bond yields
Continue readingBy
Top 5 fixed income ideas for 2025
Continue readingGoing their separate ways: Capitalizing on bond divergence
Continue readingMultiple authors
Bond Market Outlook
Continue readingMultiple authors
URL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
Thank you for your registration
You will shortly receive an email with your unique link to our preference center
Read Next
Flexibility with focus: how to position fixed income for volatility
Portfolio Manager Martin Harvey and Investment Director Marco Giordano explore how a focused use of flexibility can help position fixed income portfolios for volatility.
US debt dynamics: Is there a path to sustainability?
How worried should investors be about US debt sustainability? Macro Strategist Michael Medeiros discusses the implications of soaring US federal budget deficits and the likely bond market response.
Deeply seeking the impact of AI spending on bond yields
Brij Khurana explores the surprising way in which AI spending may impact Treasury yields and complicate the Fed's rate-policy decisions.
By
Top 5 fixed income ideas for 2025
Fixed Income Strategist Amar Reganti and Investment Communications Manager Adam Norman outline which five areas of fixed income may be best positioned in 2025.
Going their separate ways: Capitalizing on bond divergence
Our fixed income experts discuss how to position portfolios for a world of uncertainty and divergence, exploring key themes and evolving bond opportunities for 2025.
Multiple authors
Bond Market Outlook
Our fixed income experts assess how to capitalize on market volatility with a flexible and dynamic approach that leverages diverse high-yielding opportunities and manages risks carefully.
Multiple authors
Are US election probabilities now a critical driver of bond yields?
Our expert argues that the US election remains a critical catalyst for the bond market given the contrast between both parties as it relates to supply side policies such as trade and immigration, and to policy differences around taxation and regulation.
Capitalizing on rate shifts: Parsing opportunities in the second half
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Campe Goodman and Fixed Income Strategist Amar Reganti discuss how to capitalize on potential rate shifts in the second half of the year
June FOMC meeting: May disinflation is welcome, but is not enough for a rate cut
Fixed Income Analyst Caroline Casavant discusses what June's FOMC meeting tells us about the US Federal Reserve’s latest thinking on interest-rate cuts.
Governments have been slow to reduce their fiscal deficits — it could cost them
Our expert explores the investment implications of continued excessive deficit spending by G7 countries.
FOMC: Stable policy amid market volatility
The Fed is holding steady amid market turmoil. See our quick notes on the FOMC's March policy statement, forecasts, and the Fed chair's press conference.
URL References
Related Insights
© Copyright 2025 Wellington Management Company LLP. All rights reserved. WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT ® is a registered service mark of Wellington Group Holdings LLP. For institutional or professional investors only.
Enjoying this content?
Get similar insights delivered straight to your inbox. Simply choose what you’re interested in and we’ll bring you our best research and market perspectives.
Thank you for joining our email preference center.
You’ll soon receive an email with a link to access and update your preferences.