- Fixed Income Analyst
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Insights
- Capabilities
- About Us
- My Account
United States, Institutional
Changechevron_rightThank you for your registration
You will shortly receive an email with your unique link to our preference center.
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
US Treasury yields had increased ahead of the March Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, as some investors expected the committee to adopt a more hawkish tone on the back of mixed economic data. That change in tone did not materialize. Instead, the FOMC appeared to interpret recent data as consistent with its goal of returning inflation to 2%.
The FOMC’s March policy statement was little changed from January and continued to characterize the committee’s employment and inflation goals as “moving into better balance.” The February CPI had shown persistent inflation in core services, but a moderation in the rise of shelter costs and food prices. The March policy statement also continued to note that the unemployment rate “remained low” despite the uptick in unemployment to 3.9% in February.
The median FOMC participant’s projection for the policy rate at year-end 2024 was unchanged at 4.625%, though the skew of the distribution remained toward higher rates. The median projections for year-ends 2025 and 2026 increased 25 basis points each to 3.875% and 3.125%, respectively, though the range of these forecasts remains quite wide. The longer-run “dot” also increased modestly from 2.5% to 2.562%.
In terms of economic projections, the median forecast for real GDP moved up to 2.1% from 1.4%. The median forecast for core PCE moved up to 2.6% from 2.4%, and the median forecast for unemployment moved down to 4.0% from 4.1%.
During his press conference, Chair Powell adopted a balanced tone, and repeated that the risks to achieving the committee’s mandate are “two-sided.” He noted, as he has in all recent remarks, that he believes the policy rate is at its peak for the economic cycle, which could be a way of using forward guidance to reduce term premia and rates on longer-maturity securities. He characterized the labor market as strong but noted some signs that it’s slowing, including a decline in job openings and job quits, survey-based weakness, and moderation in wage growth.
Powell acknowledged elevated inflation prints in January and February but discussed them as individual prints on the path to lower inflation. He repeatedly mentioned that seasonal effects may have inflated the January figure. He also expressed confidence that slowing in the shelter component of services inflation will occur, following the leads of private sector measures of rent, which have nearly flatlined. He also noted that the committee was hesitant to change the course of policy in response to individual data points of lower-than-expected inflation last year, and thus that it would be hesitant to overreact to individual data points of higher-than-expected inflation now.
Powell noted that plans to moderate the pace of balance sheet runoff will be enacted “fairly soon.” He indicated that longer-term goals of the committee, including movement toward a mostly-Treasury balance sheet and move toward shorter maturity securities would not be prioritized in the next change to the balance sheet. Since the fall of 2022, the US Federal Reserve (Fed) has been reducing the balance sheet by reinvesting principal payments over US$60 billion in Treasury securities every month. The Fed has reinvested principal payments over US$35 billion in mortgage securities, though in practice because the Fed holds low-coupon mortgages where prepayments have been low, the principal payments have not hit the US$35 billion cap. Instead, the Fed’s balance sheet has been reduced by about US$20 billion – US$25 billion in MBS securities per month. The pace of balance sheet runoff is twice the pace adopted during the Fed’s first attempt at balance sheet normalization before COVID.
In the context of the balance sheet, Powell noted that the committee hoped to move from “abundant” reserves to “ample” reserves, though it hopes to stay far from the floor of “ample” reserves. He mentioned that he expects reserve balances to decline close to in-line with balance sheet runoff once usage of the overnight reverse repurchase agreements (ON RRP) facility, which has declined rapidly, nears zero. He reiterated that the goal of moderating the pace of balance sheet runoff is to extend its length by avoiding money market disruptions. (Recall that because liquidity is unevenly distributed in the system, money market stress can occur even in an abundant regime paradigm when a limited group of participants are unable to access funds, as was the case in 2019.)
Expert
Chart in Focus: Is the Fed rate cut positive for risk?
Continue readingThe Fed architecture under scrutiny: What are the investment implications?
Continue readingFOMC: Cushioning the US labor market
Continue readingTwilight zone: how to interpret today’s uncertain macro picture
Continue readingRethinking the Fed’s dual mandate
Continue readingBy
Stagflation watch: Thoughts on tariffs, inflation, and Fed policy
Continue readingSeverance: The split between the economy and the markets
Continue readingURL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
Thank you for your registration
You will shortly receive an email with your unique link to our preference center
Chart in Focus: Is the Fed rate cut positive for risk?
In this edition of Chart in Focus, we examine how the Fed’s long-awaited interest rate cut may influence risk assets.
The Fed architecture under scrutiny: What are the investment implications?
Macro Strategist Juhi Dhawan looks at how changes in the Federal Reserve's personnel and decision making could impact policy, the US dollar, and financial markets.
FOMC: Cushioning the US labor market
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Jeremy Forster analyzes the Fed's decision to cut interest rates at the September FOMC meeting.
Twilight zone: how to interpret today’s uncertain macro picture
Macro Strategist John Butler and Investment Director Marco Giordano explore how to interpret today’s uncertain macroeconomic picture and its key implications.
Rethinking the Fed’s dual mandate
Is it time for a fresh perspective on the dual mandate? Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Brij Khurana explores the potential benefits of reorienting monetary policy toward maximizing productivity.
By
Stagflation watch: Thoughts on tariffs, inflation, and Fed policy
US Macro Strategist Juhi Dhawan considers signs the US economy may be moving toward a toxic mix of slowing growth and rising inflation, creating challenges for the Fed and investors.
Severance: The split between the economy and the markets
While markets have bounced back since Liberation Day, policy changes and macro data bear watching. Heading into the second half of 2025, we're focused on relative opportunities across asset classes created by disconnects and divides between markets and economies.
Oh baby, baby, it’s a wild world
Just one quarter into the year, many policy and economic assumptions have been turned on their head. What does it all mean for equity, bond, and commodity markets around the world? Members of our Investment Strategy & Solutions Group offer their outlook.
Fed delivers rate cut, but hawkish 2025 guidance sends yields up
Fixed Income Analyst Caroline Casavant examines the outcome of the December 18 Federal Open Market Committee meeting and the implications for rates, inflation, and real growth.
Going their separate ways: Capitalizing on bond divergence
Our fixed income experts discuss how to position portfolios for a world of uncertainty and divergence, exploring key themes and evolving bond opportunities for 2025.
Multiple authors
The year of uncertainty: 5 macro themes to watch in 2025
Macro Strategists John Butler and Eoin O’Callaghan outline five macro themes for investors to watch in 2025 in a year they see defined by exceptional uncertainty and an extraordinary macroeconomic backdrop.
URL References
Related Insights
© Copyright 2025 Wellington Management Company LLP. All rights reserved. WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT ® is a registered service mark of Wellington Group Holdings LLP. For institutional or professional investors only.
Enjoying this content?
Get similar insights delivered straight to your inbox. Simply choose what you’re interested in and we’ll bring you our best research and market perspectives.
Thank you for joining our email preference center.
You’ll soon receive an email with a link to access and update your preferences.