- Macro Strategist
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Insights
- Capabilities
- About Us
- My Account
United States, Institutional
Changechevron_rightThank you for your registration
You will shortly receive an email with your unique link to our preference center.
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
When it comes, the tapering and eventual end of the Federal Reserve’s quantitative tightening (QT) program — one of the key tools in the central bank’s battle with inflation — will be good news for financial markets as more liquidity becomes available. But the key question is this: Can the Fed engineer the end of QT without any mishaps for small banks and the equity market as a whole or will bank reserves tighten first, impinging on market liquidity?
The Fed commenced its QT program — a reversal of its crisis-era asset-buying program (quantitative easing) aimed at keeping interest rates down — in June 2022, setting a monthly balance-sheet runoff cap of $60 billion in Treasury securities and $35 billion in mortgage-backed securities (MBS). In aggregate, the Fed has reduced its balance sheet by $1.3 trillion, leaving total assets held at $7.7 trillion as of the end of December 2023. In relation to economic output, the balance sheet has gone from 36% of GDP to 28%.
On the liability side, reductions in the Fed’s balance sheet have come from reverse repos. Assets in the reverse repo facility (which allows eligible counterparties to park cash at the Fed and earn interest) declined from $2.6 trillion at the end of 2022 to $1.2 trillion at the end of 2023. The bulk of that decline came in the second half of 2023, when greater certainty of a peak in the federal funds rate, alongside increased Treasury bill issuance, resulted in some liquidation by money market funds searching for higher yields. At the current pace of decline, reverse repos could be depleted as early as the end of the first quarter of this year or the beginning of the second quarter, which could put pressure on some money market rates — a potential outcome that is starting to catch the attention of members of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) as they contemplate the policy path from here.
The Fed’s previous guidance in terms of what it would need to see before ending QT included: 1) get the balance sheet to about 18% of GDP; 2) get excess reserves at banks to about 10% of GDP, which would amount to $2.8 trillion (down from $3.4 trillion at the end of 2023); and 3) keep an eye on money market rates for smooth functioning.
On that third point, some signs of stress began to appear in money markets at the end of 2023. That prompted comments in the Fed’s December meeting minutes and, separately, from Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan (an expert in financial system “plumbing”) and New York Fed President John Williams (the New York Fed is responsible for conducting open market operations under the direction of the FOMC). All of this suggests the Fed will start to think about winding down QT this year. Meanwhile, points one and two above imply that should QT continue past the first quarter of 2024, excess reserves at banks would be the target for QT, which could put additional pressure on banks if rates stay high and deposits flow out from banks to money market funds.
Importantly, the Fed’s bank term lending facility is set to expire in the middle of March, potentially creating uncertainty about the health of banks that still find themselves in a hole when it comes to the collateral value of some assets on their balance sheets. In this context, President Logan’s comments about dispersion within the banking system around reserves may be telling, suggesting that liquidity broadly but also distributionally will be watched for signs of stress.
With this in mind, the Fed’s ability to get the timing of its QT moves right could be quite important to the smooth functioning of markets. The Fed minutes and various Fed speeches indicate a desire to taper QT as a first step and then eventually end the program, all based on the FOMC’s read on the underlying reserve needs of the financial system.
I see a number of potential scenarios that could play out. For example:
Two additional thoughts on the execution of the tapering: Even after the Fed begins tapering QT, it is likely to leave MBS in runoff mode given that the $35 billion cap has never been binding and the Fed has long expressed a desire to move away from MBS in its portfolio. Another development to monitor will be whether the Fed chooses to reinvest its principal payments into shorter-maturity Treasury securities when the time comes. Over time, this would restore the term premium to the Treasury curve and push longer-term yields higher.
Finally, given the importance of this decision by the Fed to the economy and the markets, I’ll be tracking a number of indicators to gauge the timing of the initial taper, such as relevant money market interest rates, reserves in the banking system, the US fiscal deficit, and flows from money market funds.
Expert
Private credit outlook for 2026: 5 key trends
Continue readingThe rising tide of AI: How it could lift US productivity, growth, and profits
Continue readingAre hedge funds the missing ingredient?
Continue readingRapid Fire Questions with Ross Dilkes
Continue readingInvesting in 2026: prepare for inflationary growth
Continue readingIs all that glitters still gold?
Continue readingURL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
Thank you for your registration
You will shortly receive an email with your unique link to our preference center
Private credit outlook for 2026: 5 key trends
Our private credit experts discuss five themes driving the asset class’s 2026 outlook, including public/private convergence, changing credit profiles, the growth of retail, and much more.
The rising tide of AI: How it could lift US productivity, growth, and profits
From an economic and market standpoint, a lot is riding on the future of artificial intelligence. Macro Strategist Juhi Dhawan sees plenty of reasons for excitement but also a need for patience along the way.
Are hedge funds the missing ingredient?
Inflation, volatility, and valuations — they all raise questions about portfolio diversification and resilience. Multi-Asset Strategists Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson and Adam Berger explain why multi-strategy and equity long/short hedge funds could provide the answers. They offer insights on adding allocations to a traditional portfolio mix and a recipe for manager selection.
Monthly Market Review — October 2025
A monthly update on equity, fixed income, currency, and commodity markets.
Rapid Fire Questions with Ross Dilkes
In this edition of “Rapid Fire Questions,” fixed income portfolio manager Ross Dilkes shares his views on the Asia credit market—covering the macro outlook, China’s momentum, the most compelling opportunities across the region, and key risks shaping the next 12 months.
Investing in 2026: prepare for inflationary growth
Macro Strategists John Butler and Eoin O'Callaghan share their annual macro outlook and discuss likely implications for markets and investors. They outline four potential scenarios graded by level of probability.
Is all that glitters still gold?
Gold has delivered impressive gains thus far in 2025, but what does that say about market risks and the recent strong returns of stocks? Multi-Asset Strategist Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson offers her take on the precious metal and the case for diversification in today’s market.
Questioning US credit quality
Fixed income strategist Amar Reganti examines questions surrounding US creditworthiness.
By
Chart in Focus: Is the Fed rate cut positive for risk?
In this edition of Chart in Focus, we examine how the Fed’s long-awaited interest rate cut may influence risk assets.
Chart in Focus: Three reasons to keep the faith in US credit quality
Our fixed income experts highlight the resilience of US institutional credibility.
What’s the Fed got to do with it? The impact of rate cuts on CLO equity
Our CLO experts discuss the implications of Fed rate cuts on CLO equity, emphasizing its potential to maintain income amidst rate sensitivity challenges in other credit assets.
URL References
Related Insights
© Copyright 2025 Wellington Management Company LLP. All rights reserved. WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT ® is a registered service mark of Wellington Group Holdings LLP. For institutional or professional investors only.
Enjoying this content?
Get similar insights delivered straight to your inbox. Simply choose what you’re interested in and we’ll bring you our best research and market perspectives.
Thank you for joining our email preference center.
You’ll soon receive an email with a link to access and update your preferences.
Monthly Market Review — October 2025
Continue readingBy