- Macro Strategist, Hedge Fund Group
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Insights
- Capabilities
- About Us
- My Account
United States, Institutional
Changechevron_rightThe views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
My initial assessment of the sweeping tariffs the US presidential administration announced on 2 April is that they appear to be genuinely groundbreaking with potentially far-reaching consequences for financial risk assets, but I want to start by emphasising again how much could change. The extent of the US trading partners’ countermeasures — at time of writing, China has already announced a 34% tariff on all US imports — and the US administration’s tolerance levels for negative blowback in particular could alter the trajectory over the near and longer term. However, what we know is that the outlook is bad for growth, from both a US and global perspective, and markets have reacted accordingly. We see a clear risk-off move, with equities going down and bond rallying. However, what is interesting is that the US dollar is not benefiting from its traditional safe-haven status and rather than rallying, as you would expect, it is doing the opposite by falling against most currencies.
This could be a tentative sign that global investors may be reconsidering how they view the US. After all, why are so many of the world’s assets parked there? In my view, it is because the world’s largest economy offered growth, return and liquidity but also safety and credibility. Tariffs don't only hit growth in the short term; they also change how international investors think about what the US has to offer. How the US Federal Reserve (Fed) responds could be a critical part of this changing investor perception. I think that tariffs are putting the Fed in a difficult position. The growth shock may put pressure on policymakers to cut rates aggressively but that may raise demand and, with it, the impact of tariffs on prices, which would push up inflation.
From a global investor’s perspective, this would imply that the US no longer offers the same protection against rising inflation. If the Fed keeps rates elevated to combat above-target inflation, it will face increased political pressure that could undermine its credibility, which again is a negative for investors. If investors conclude the US is henceforth likely to offer less growth, less return and less safety, we could see a structural reversal of capital flows to the detriment of the US, which would also translate into a significantly lower dollar and a higher risk premium. Much could change — it is not inconceivable, for instance, that President Trump could end up unwinding many of these tariffs — but at the same time, it is hard to negate the sense of rupture. In my opinion, there is a real possibility that we may have witnessed the shotgun start for capital flowing out of the US.
The market reaction to date also suggests a historic shift in its perception of Europe and the euro area, in particular. Hitherto, in the event of a global shock, Europe always tended to be the weak spot, with recurring doubts about credit sustainability forcing the euro area into fiscal tightening. To date, we have not seen a repeat of that scenario. Instead, what we're seeing is a stronger euro and tight sovereign spreads. Investors appear to view Europe in a fundamentally different light since Germany agreed to a structural fiscal loosening. This means that Europe may finally be able to reposition policy pre-emptively and adopt a more pro-growth stance. I think this is an important development for investors to watch, especially if it were to coincide with a return of European investors’ capital from the US.
Expert
Resilient growth, rising risks: Investing through the energy shock
Continue readingSeptember FOMC: Doves capitulate
Continue readingOil is the spark — the cost of capital is the story
Continue readingThe most important midterm question?
Continue readingHigh asset prices, not low interest rates, are driving inflation
Continue readingBy
2026 midyear geopolitical update: What “structural competition” means for investors
Continue readingURL References
Related Insights
Get our latest market insights straight to your inbox.
Thank you for your registration
You will shortly receive an email with your unique link to our preference center
Resilient growth, rising risks: Investing through the energy shock
Macro Strategist Eoin O’Callaghan explores the drivers of resilient growth amid the continued energy shock and discusses why investors need to keep a close eye on evolving macro conditions.
September FOMC: Doves capitulate
For the first time in over three years, the Fed raised the target rate range to 3.75%-4.00% in September. Our team looks at what's driving the shift and what it means going forward.
Monthly Market Review — August 2026
A monthly update on equity, fixed income, currency, and commodity markets.
Oil is the spark — the cost of capital is the story
Higher oil prices are refocusing markets on inflation and the Fed, but the bigger investment story may be a broader shift toward a higher cost of capital and new diversification challenges.
The most important midterm question?
As the mid-term elections approach, the things the election won't change may matter more than who wins and who loses.
High asset prices, not low interest rates, are driving inflation
Wealth distribution in the US has rendered the Federal Reserve’s usual tools less effective. The Fed will need to address asset prices head-on in creative ways if it is going to return inflation to target.
By
2026 midyear geopolitical update: What “structural competition” means for investors
Our expert explores how structural geopolitical competition is reshaping markets, raising risk premiums, and creating long-term investment implications across defense, energy, technology, supply chains, sovereign credibility, and portfolio resilience.
The state of commercial real estate
We explore how macroeconomic, demographic, and sector-specific trends are reshaping commercial real estate, and why selectivity by sector, asset, quality, and capital structure may matter more than broad asset-class exposure.
Warsh’s first FOMC: We have a task force for that
Our experts highlight new task forces, examine evolving inflation and labor dynamics, and contend that the Fed soon may need to choose between growth support and price stability.
The questions incoming Fed Chair Warsh will need to answer
We examine the key questions that incoming Fed chairman Kevin Warsh may need to confront as monetary policy faces new limits and new risks.
By
Markets are underestimating the persistence of inflation
Macro Strategists Eoin O'Callaghan, Michael Medeiros and John Butler share their macro outlook for the remainder of 2026 and discuss the implications of the ongoing energy shock for markets and investors.
Multiple authors
URL References
Related Insights
© Copyright 2026 Wellington Management Company LLP. All rights reserved. WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT ® is a registered service mark of Wellington Group Holdings LLP. For institutional or professional investors only.
Enjoying this content?
Get similar insights delivered straight to your inbox. Simply choose what you’re interested in and we’ll bring you our best research and market perspectives.
Monthly Market Review — August 2026
Continue readingBy