- About Us
- My Account
The views expressed are those of the authors at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
The market for labelled, or sustainable, debt continues to expand, with an estimated US$3.5 trillion outstanding as of 31 May 2023.1 Despite a slowdown in 2022, we believe supportive policy and commitments from governments and corporates to meet sustainability targets should continue to drive new issuance. Improving bond structures may provide additional tailwinds. Here, two Wellington experts take stock of the rapidly growing sustainable debt market.
Tom: Labelled-bond issuance was slower than expected in 2022, falling 23% from 2021’s record high of approximately US$1 trillion.1 In my view, last year’s slowdown was the result of two main forces. First, lower primary volumes reflected rising interest rates and higher financing costs. Second, issuance of social and sustainability bonds — popular means of meeting surging social needs during the COVID-19 pandemic — declined.
Despite this drop in overall supply, sustainable debt issuance as a percentage of overall corporate debt supply rose (Figure 1). We expect this trend to continue as issuers tap capital markets to meet sustainability challenges — from net zero and decarbonization to closing the funding gap to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In 2022, nearly one-third of euro-denominated investment-grade corporate new issuance was in sustainable debt format, up from 25% in 2021.2
Separately, the volume of sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs) — previously the fastest-growing segment — declined most. Increased scrutiny of SLB structures could continue to hamper their issuance in the short term. Longer term, though, as corporates and sovereigns look to meet their commitments, we expect sustainable debt issuance to increase across the board.
Tom: Sustainable debt is a relatively new segment of the market, without robust regulatory frameworks that could help weed out bad actors and prevent “greenwashing.” We continue to see proliferation of debt labelled green, social, sustainable, and so forth, and increasingly from issuers who are opaque about their sustainability goals. Greater regulatory focus on green bonds in the form of an “EU Taxonomy Alignment” and a potential “EU Green Bond Standard” are steps in the right direction. Policies like these could promote increased transparency, not only on how proceeds are used, but also on how green bonds align with an issuer’s broader sustainability credentials.
I believe 2023 should also be an eventful year for sustainability-linked bonds. The International Capital Market Association (ICMA) tightened voluntary standards for SLBs halfway through 2022, and we sense that the market is becoming more cautious about sustainability-performance targets (SPTs) that lack ambition or are indistinguishable from activities conducted during the normal course of business. Many SLB issuers will approach their first SPT observation dates in 2023, and it will be interesting to gauge their performance relative to key performance indicators. We would not be surprised to see the market start to “price out” SLBs that lack appropriate embedded targets, relative to more ambitious issuers.
As a syndicate-desk trader, my regular conversations with issuers and their advisors are an opportunity to highlight what we believe are structural deficiencies in labelled-bond offerings. And as we often meet issuers during the pre-marketing of future deals, we can suggest ways of structuring sustainable bonds, including robust SPTs. This is one way we help promote better industry standards to ensure that capital is deployed in the most impactful manner possible.
Campe: In my eight years looking at debt markets through an impact lens, I’m pleased to say that standards have improved, although there is still work to be done. In our fixed income impact strategies, we invest in both labelled- and non-labelled issuance that we believe can have a positive environmental and social impact. In doing so, we apply our impact framework to every issuer and security from the bottom up. To address the suitability of labelled issuance for those portfolios, we apply a robust labelled-bond framework.
Ultimately, we think it is essential to look beyond a bond’s label. For us to understand whether a financed project will have positive social or environmental impact, not only do we need to be comfortable that the labelled bond is robust in structure, we also need to know as much as possible about that issuer and its commitment to creating sustained positive impact. Ongoing, constructive engagement with issuers about a range of subjects, including fundamentals, bond structures and ESG- and impact-related questions, helps us develop a fuller understanding of issuers’ approaches and intentions.
Tom: Issuance themes are becoming more diverse and sophisticated, and we are interested to see what the rest of 2023 brings. Issuers often have specific targets in mind, from human rights to biodiversity and more. For example, the world's first orange bond was issued earlier this year, named for the color of the icon of UN SDG 5: Gender equality.
Campe: One area I am closely monitoring is blue bonds, which support marine ecosystem conservation. While this market is in its infancy, recent developments could trigger much more issuance. With the new UN High Seas Treaty, signed in March, nations around the world agreed to support marine biodiversity — specifically designating 30% of international waters as protected areas by the end of this decade. The accord could lead to a surge in financing of ocean-conservation investment. Prospective issuers are awaiting guidance from the ICMA on blue bond structures, expected later this year.
Campe: We remain excited by the growing opportunities to generate impact across public fixed income markets, whether through labelled debt or investing in the traditional debt of high-impact issuers. Genuine, honest application of labelled-bond structures remains a top priority in our assessment of securities for our impact portfolios. We are committed to a bottom-up, research-driven approach that evaluates both financial fundamentals and sustainable bona fides, as we believe this approach serves us well in identifying new investment opportunities.
1Bloomberg NEF, Bloomberg LP. Includes green, social, sustainable, or sustainability-linked bonds as determined by Bloomberg. Excludes municipal bonds and asset-backed securities.| 2Barclays Research.
Climate mapping in action: Investment case studiesContinue reading
Private investing portfolio company interview with AMP Robotics CEOContinue reading
Decoding impact expectations: best practices for impact investors and companiesContinue reading
Why sustainable food systems matter to investorsContinue reading
Why climate change matters in private marketsContinue reading
Climate mapping in action: Investment case studies
We describe our Climate Exposure Risk Application (CERA), which can help our investment teams visualize and quantify physical climate risks.
Private investing portfolio company interview with AMP Robotics CEO
Dr. Matanya Horowitz, CEO of AMP Robotics, highlights how the company integrates AI and robotics into the recycling industry and explores the “actionable guidance” Wellington provides on ESG and other strategic issues.
Decoding impact expectations: best practices for impact investors and companies
We share three recommendations each for impact investors and companies to help them better understand and manage each other's expectations.
Why sustainable food systems matter to investors
Our climate research expert explores insights from our joint work with Woodwell Climate Research Center on the pivotal relationship between food systems and biodiversity and highlights potential investment opportunities.
Why climate change matters in private markets
Power hungry: Why the energy transition may depend on storage and flexibility
See why our utilities experts see demand for large-scale batteries and flexible-power generation growing more than consensus.
Shareholder activism in Japan: Integrating ESG within the investment process
In the final article within our series on shareholder activism in Japan, ESG Analyst Soo Ho Jung shares how the Japan equity team integrates ESG to help realize value for investors.
When extreme weather becomes the norm: what’s next for climate investors?
Climate investors can play a crucial role in accelerating mitigation and adaptation solutions. But finding investable opportunities requires a deep understanding of the climate investing landscape.
WellSaid: The economic significance of biodiversity
In this short clip from his WellSaid podcast interview, Dr. Zach Zobel of Woodwell Climate Research Center discusses the economic importance of coral reefs — lynchpins of marine biodiversity and vital to fishing, tourism, and other industries.
Green horizons: How the shift toward sustainable finance may reshape fixed income markets
Three sustainability trends have the potential to reshape fixed income markets, leading to a range of new opportunities for investors.
Building resilience: Key questions equity investors need to ask today
Yolanda Courtines explores how equity investors can re-assess the resilience of their core portfolio against higher interest rates and more adverse macro conditions.