- Fixed Income Portfolio Manager
- About Us
- My Account
The views expressed are those of the authors at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
There is a lot happening in the global economy right now, but if we were to choose one piece of data that is likely to inform our thinking about credit markets over the next six to 12 months, it would be the reduction we’re witnessing in the global central bank balance sheet (Figure 1).
There was, of course, a huge spike in central bank asset purchases in 2020, in response to the pandemic. But more broadly, we have seen nearly $20 trillion of central bank purchases since the global financial crisis (GFC) in 2008. From a market perspective, we’ve been quite spoiled. Even when central banks made a concerted effort to take back some stimulus in 2018 – 2019, they pivoted away from that path fairly quickly when markets started to crack.
What's changed today and left central banks willing to begin withdrawing liquidity? There is now a clear trade-off between growth and inflation that didn’t exist prior to this year. Inflation has reached levels we haven’t seen since the 1980s, creating a cost that central banks cannot ignore.
Our research suggests this change is structural, and that we should expect more cycles and much greater volatility in economic growth and inflation. In our view, central banks are no longer a suppresser of volatility, as they generally have been since the GFC. Instead, they are more likely to amplify volatility going forward.
There has been a clear link between global quantitative easing and the direction of risk assets, including equities and credit spreads. This will likely present a challenge for investors for the rest of this year and into 2023. We think central banks are behind the curve and have a long way to go in reducing their balance sheet. In fact, they still completed $100 million in asset purchases in the first few months of this year (following $3.5 trillion in purchases in 2021 and $6 trillion in 2020). But by the second half of 2022, central banks will have fully transitioned to being sellers of bonds.
We expect this environment to generate new opportunities. Historically, when central banks are in full tightening mode, that’s when the tide goes out and it becomes possible to see which assets were mispriced, which business models didn’t really work, and who made the wrong call by putting leverage on certain business models. This should result in heightened dispersion in the market, and in fact, we’re already seeing signs of this, as shown in Figure 2.
As credit market investors, we believe this will be a promising backdrop for exploiting inefficiencies through security selection. We think it will require a combination of top-down credit market analysis and bottom-up research on sectors and individual issuers.
For more on the macro factors driving fixed income and other markets, see our Mid-2022 Investment Outlook.
Macro implications of the AI revolution: is the market right?Continue reading
Have the Fed’s recent comments just provided a tailwind for agency MBS?Continue reading
Securitized debt: Strategies for navigating emerging cracks in consumers’ financial healthContinue reading
Soft or hard landing, bonds can offer compelling valueContinue reading
The “cleanest dirty shirt” now has too many stainsContinue reading
Public CRE debt — Risk, opportunity, or both?Continue reading
Commercial property values shrinking? No problem for big citiesContinue reading
Macro implications of the AI revolution: is the market right?
Macro Strategist John Butler sets out an initial framework to help answer key questions about the potential macro impact of artificial intelligence.
Have the Fed’s recent comments just provided a tailwind for agency MBS?
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Brij Khurana explains why the market may be missing an important nuance in the Fed's focus on financial conditions.
Securitized debt: Strategies for navigating emerging cracks in consumers’ financial health
Our expert highlights reasons for deteriorating consumer financial health and explores strategies for mitigating risk in securitized asset-backed securities.
Soft or hard landing, bonds can offer compelling value
Against a backdrop of macroeconomic uncertainty, elevated bond market volatility and a higher-for-longer policy rate narrative, we asked portfolio manager Connor Fitzgerald to share his views on the outlook and how he is positioning bond portfolios to add value in the current environment.
The “cleanest dirty shirt” now has too many stains
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager posits that US fiscal profligacy will change the game for asset allocators.
Public CRE debt — Risk, opportunity, or both?
Our experts explore the implications of the ongoing stress in the public CRE debt, or commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS), space for investors and analyze risks and opportunities for ratings-constrained insurers.
Commercial property values shrinking? No problem for big cities
We analyze the impact of declining office property values and outline the reasons why they believe large cities should be able to weather the storm of shrinking commercial property value.
Why cash won’t cut it for long: The case for bonds
Global Investment and Multi-Asset Strategist Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson and Investment Strategy Analyst Patrick Wattiau explore the relative potential benefits of bonds versus cash.
What AI could mean for fixed income
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Brij Khurana details the potential effects of artificial intelligence on the fixed income market.
US loses its AAA rating (again)
US Macro Strategist Michael Medeiros analyzes Fitch's recent downgrade of US credit quality and explores the bigger issues at play.
Bank loans remain attractive despite macroeconomic uncertainty
Our experts believe that bank loans currently offer attractive levels of income and have already priced in an overly bearish macroeconomic view.