- Multi-Asset Strategist
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Insights
- Capabilities
- About Us
- My Account
United States, Institutional
Changechevron_rightThank you for your registration
You will shortly receive an email with your unique link to our preference center.
The views expressed are those of the authors at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
As inflation data has come in higher than expected recently, the number of Fed rate cuts expected by the market in 2024 has fallen from six at the beginning of the year to just one or two. By the end of April, the 10-year US Treasury yield had risen more than 80 bps year to date and the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index had returned around -3%.
While the Fed decision to hold off on rate cuts for an extended period (it’s been nine months since the central bank stopped hiking rates) may be disappointing to the market, it does not necessarily scuttle the case for owning bonds. We saw a similar situation following the Fed tightening cycle of 2004 – 2006. The Fed hiked rates 17 times during that cycle (versus 11 in the current cycle) and then was “on hold” for 15 months before delivering the first rate cut in September 2007.
Despite the lengthy delay, bonds outperformed cash over the one-, two-, and three-year periods following the last hike in June of 2006 (Figure 1). For example, over the two years after the June 2006 rate hike, cash returned 9%, but government bonds returned 16%, the aggregate index 14%, and corporate bonds 11%. In Figure 2, we can see that yields bounced around in the year following the last rate hike of 2006 and then declined the following year as the Fed’s cutting cycle began (in September 2007), producing capital gains for bonds.
We would offer three takeaways for investors to consider:
There are risks, of course. Not long after the 2004 – 2006 tightening cycle and the rate cuts that followed, we saw the global financial crisis emerge and corporate bond spreads blow out due to liquidity strains in the financial system. Today, while not impossible, it is difficult to envision rate cuts against a backdrop of a severe recession, given that economic growth and employment are solid and there are few excesses in corporate or consumer balance sheets. We think the more likely risk is the potential for the Fed to pivot back to rate hikes if inflation remains stubbornly above its 2% target. But in his May 1 press conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell said the Federal Open Market Committee’s working assumption is that the next move will still be a cut given restrictive policy and signs of labor market softening. He did say that it will take longer than expected to get to rate cuts, as policy tightening and other post-pandemic adjustments are working their way through the economy with a lag. But he was also more explicit about possible paths to a rate cut than a rate hike.
Experts
Weekly Market Update
Continue readingBy
The economy needs more competition. AI can make that happen.
Continue readingBy
Three ways to reset credit portfolios for a more volatile world
Continue readingMultiple authors
Rapid Fire Questions with Campe Goodman - 1st Year of Trump 2.0
Continue readingFOMC: Holding the line amid geopolitical crosscurrents
Continue readingChart in Focus: Diversifying for different macro regimes
Continue readingA dedicated cash-balance strategy: Why now?
Continue readingURL References
Related Insights
Get our latest market insights straight to your inbox.
Thank you for your registration
You will shortly receive an email with your unique link to our preference center
Weekly Market Update
What do you need to know about the markets this week? Tune in to Paul Skinner's weekly market update for the lowdown on where the markets are and what investors should keep their eye on this week.
By
The economy needs more competition. AI can make that happen.
Brij Khurana believes that as AI evolves, it will challenge traditional business moats and revitalize competition across industries. This transformation could lead to increased productivity, higher real wages, and stronger economic growth.
By
Three ways to reset credit portfolios for a more volatile world
Our experts, Fixed Income Portfolio Managers Campe Goodman and Rob Burn, and Investment Director Raina Dunkelberger, explore how to reset credit portfolios for a more volatile world.
Multiple authors
Rapid Fire Questions with Campe Goodman - 1st Year of Trump 2.0
In this edition of “Rapid Fire Questions,” fixed income portfolio manager Campe Goodman shares his assessment on the first year of Trump 2.0, and perspectives on why he remains constructive on fixed income, and where he is finding attractive opportunities.
FOMC: Holding the line amid geopolitical crosscurrents
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Jeremy Forster discusses the Fed's cautious stance amid geopolitical tensions, inflation risks, and labor market dynamics.
Chart in Focus: Diversifying for different macro regimes
Against the backdrop of heightened geopolitical uncertainty, our experts Alex King and Joshua Riefler explore how to optimise diversification across different macro regimes.
A dedicated cash-balance strategy: Why now?
Members of our LDI Team explain why the time might be right for some corporate DB plans to consider adding a dedicated cash-balance approach to the liability-hedging allocation.
The Fed’s growing footprint on the market has a cost
Brij Khurana explains what the Federal Reserve's balance sheet expansion may mean for inflation and asset prices.
By
Chart in focus: Rethinking the bond mix
Alex King and Josh Riefler explore the evolving role of global government bonds in portfolios against a backdrop of tight spreads.
Cash-balance and traditional liabilities: An integrated investment approach
Members of our LDI Team offer ideas on how best to integrate traditional and cash-balance liabilities in a corporate DB plan’s investment strategy.
Housing affordability directives not a silver bullet
Our Fixed Income Portfolio Managers profile housing affordability directives, examining their modest effects on mortgage rates and institutional buying restrictions.
URL References
Related Insights
© Copyright 2026 Wellington Management Company LLP. All rights reserved. WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT ® is a registered service mark of Wellington Group Holdings LLP. For institutional or professional investors only.
Enjoying this content?
Get similar insights delivered straight to your inbox. Simply choose what you’re interested in and we’ll bring you our best research and market perspectives.
Thank you for joining our email preference center.
You’ll soon receive an email with a link to access and update your preferences.