- Fixed Income Credit Analyst
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Insights
- Capabilities
- About Us
- My Account
United States, Institutional
Changechevron_rightThank you for your registration
You will shortly receive an email with your unique link to our preference center.
The views expressed are those of the authors at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
Demand for office space has dropped dramatically amid the rise of hybrid/flexible work policies in the post-pandemic world, posing challenges for states and cities and creating opportunities and risks for commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) bond investors. By implementing programs that encourage converting office space into multifamily housing, some states and cities are taking steps to address an issue that is vital to their economic and civic health. While markets have been dismissive of the impact of these efforts, we take a different view, and believe it could provide a tailwind for investors over time as it removes some excess office supply and accrues other economic benefits.
Cities and states are implementing policies to promote conversions for a variety of reasons:
Common policies from states and cities to promote office conversions include tax incentives, tax increment financing, and easing zoning policies. Municipal governments are offering tax incentives to developers to help subsidize the often-prohibitive costs of office-to-housing conversions. Additionally, municipalities are expanding by-right zoning policies to ease the burden of entitlement processes and make conversion simpler. Some are also offering building code exemptions, and are advantageously reducing parking restrictions, setbacks (minimum distances from roads and other properties), and open space requirements.
Other municipalities are directly funding a portion of conversion projects with tax increment financing. The federal government has launched a multiagency effort to encourage states and cities to convert more empty office buildings into housing units. This includes billions of dollars in low-interest loans, loan guarantees, grants, and tax incentives for developers. We have seen multiple success stories of these incentives encouraging conversions in New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, and Los Angeles (Figure 1). Ultimately, we believe the amount of office supply converted to multifamily spaces will largely be dictated by how significant the incentives from individual municipalities are.
Figure 1: Office-to-housing conversion initiatives in major US cities
| City | Initiatives | Category | Affordable housing requirement? |
| New York | New York State's budget included the Affordable Housing from Commercial Conversion program, which provides tax exemptions for eligible conversion projects in New York City. Projects can receive a full tax exemption during the construction period, and a 90% exemption for the first 25 years of operation. The city recently created an office reuse task force to make policy recommendations and created the Office Conversion Accelerator Program to facilitate permitting and feasibility studies. | Tax credits, Fast-track approval | Yes |
| Boston | The Boston Planning & Development Agency (BPDA) launched the Downtown Residential Conversion Incentive Pilot Program. The program allows selected developers to enter into a PILOT agreement with the city and the BPDA, which provides an abatement of up to 75%. It also creates fast-tracked processes for permitting and other review processes. At least 17% of units must be affordable. | Tax credits, Fast-track approval | Yes |
| Philadelphia | While Philadelphia is phasing out its broader tax abatement program, it has left the 10-year property tax abatement program in place for commercial-to-residential conversions. | Tax abatements | No |
| Chicago | Through the LaSalle Corridor Revitalization program, at least four buildings in Chicago's downtown are being considered for US$151 million in Tax Increment Financing funds to repurpose underused office buildings into mixed-use properties. Potential sources of funds also include tax-exempt housing bonds. This could create over 1,000 new residential units, including affordable housing. The city has also created a US$5 million grant program to repurpose lobbies and former banking floors into restaurants, cafes, and other neighborhood businesses. | Tax increment financing | Yes |
Los Angeles | Los Angeles's long-standing adaptive reuse ordinance has helped fast-track the approval process and provide building code exemptions for residential conversions of downtown buildings built before 1974. Currently, the city is drafting a new ordinance which expands the list of eligible conversion projects, including buildings that were built after 1974. | Fast-track approval, Building code exemptions | Being considered. |
Source: Wellington Management.
Conversions alone won’t solve the large supply/demand imbalance in the office sector, but they are an important part of the longer-term need to take supply out of the system which could ultimately be a tailwind over time. Just as we saw with retail properties several years ago, many malls had to be closed to bring the market into equilibrium. We saw on average of 15 – 20 mall closures per year. While this didn’t have an immediate impact on the sector, it did matter over time. A similar dynamic may be needed for the office sector’s health, and multifamily conversions are one outlet for excess supply.
We believe the market may be underappreciating some near-term benefits. For example, once a property owner decides to convert an office building, they stop renewing leases and start relocating tenants. That supply of office space immediately comes out of the system even though the property itself could take years to hit the market.
Excessive costs are the main factor that holds back many would-be developers. The market seems to be hung up on this reality. But as we discussed earlier, some cities have announced programs to reduce/remove some of the barriers to converting properties. We expect this trend to increase, and believe it is something worth watching because it could be material for the sector down the road.
We don’t anticipate conversions to create so much new supply that it would negatively impact multifamily properties in aggregate. While there has been overdevelopment in multifamily housing space in recent years, it has been concentrated in higher-end units, and the overall housing picture (when including single-family residences as well) remains fundamentally and structurally sound longer term. Additionally, we expect a 20% pullback in new multifamily completions during 2024 and have already seen a 40% decline in multifamily starts. While it will take time for new units to be absorbed, the demand drivers in place should be sustainable for the near future as homeownership remains unaffordable for many.
We remain cautious on the office sector. We are often asked “what inning are we in of the office cycle”? The answer is “it depends.” When looking at underlying loan performance in the CMBS market, delinquency numbers indicate that we are in the early innings, whereas bond prices would suggest somewhere in the middle innings. We believe there is more stress to come as loans mature and borrowers are faced with higher borrowing costs to refinance their loans. Additionally, we think rating agencies are still early in the downgrade cycle. Additional ratings stress could force selling from ratings-constrained investors, further pressuring prices. However, with stress also comes opportunity for those who can sift through the rubble and pick up attractive CMBS at distressed prices. The bottom line: For investors in CMBS bonds, we are in an environment where security selection and fundamental credit analysis will be key to uncovering opportunities and mitigating risks.
Experts
Weekly Market Update
Continue readingBy
The economy needs more competition. AI can make that happen.
Continue readingBy
Three ways to reset credit portfolios for a more volatile world
Continue readingMultiple authors
Rapid Fire Questions with Campe Goodman - 1st Year of Trump 2.0
Continue readingFOMC: Holding the line amid geopolitical crosscurrents
Continue readingChart in Focus: Diversifying for different macro regimes
Continue readingA dedicated cash-balance strategy: Why now?
Continue readingURL References
Related Insights
Get our latest market insights straight to your inbox.
Thank you for your registration
You will shortly receive an email with your unique link to our preference center
Weekly Market Update
What do you need to know about the markets this week? Tune in to Paul Skinner's weekly market update for the lowdown on where the markets are and what investors should keep their eye on this week.
By
The economy needs more competition. AI can make that happen.
Brij Khurana believes that as AI evolves, it will challenge traditional business moats and revitalize competition across industries. This transformation could lead to increased productivity, higher real wages, and stronger economic growth.
By
Three ways to reset credit portfolios for a more volatile world
Our experts, Fixed Income Portfolio Managers Campe Goodman and Rob Burn, and Investment Director Raina Dunkelberger, explore how to reset credit portfolios for a more volatile world.
Multiple authors
Rapid Fire Questions with Campe Goodman - 1st Year of Trump 2.0
In this edition of “Rapid Fire Questions,” fixed income portfolio manager Campe Goodman shares his assessment on the first year of Trump 2.0, and perspectives on why he remains constructive on fixed income, and where he is finding attractive opportunities.
FOMC: Holding the line amid geopolitical crosscurrents
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Jeremy Forster discusses the Fed's cautious stance amid geopolitical tensions, inflation risks, and labor market dynamics.
Chart in Focus: Diversifying for different macro regimes
Against the backdrop of heightened geopolitical uncertainty, our experts Alex King and Joshua Riefler explore how to optimise diversification across different macro regimes.
A dedicated cash-balance strategy: Why now?
Members of our LDI Team explain why the time might be right for some corporate DB plans to consider adding a dedicated cash-balance approach to the liability-hedging allocation.
The Fed’s growing footprint on the market has a cost
Brij Khurana explains what the Federal Reserve's balance sheet expansion may mean for inflation and asset prices.
By
Chart in focus: Rethinking the bond mix
Alex King and Josh Riefler explore the evolving role of global government bonds in portfolios against a backdrop of tight spreads.
Cash-balance and traditional liabilities: An integrated investment approach
Members of our LDI Team offer ideas on how best to integrate traditional and cash-balance liabilities in a corporate DB plan’s investment strategy.
Housing affordability directives not a silver bullet
Our Fixed Income Portfolio Managers profile housing affordability directives, examining their modest effects on mortgage rates and institutional buying restrictions.
URL References
Related Insights
© Copyright 2026 Wellington Management Company LLP. All rights reserved. WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT ® is a registered service mark of Wellington Group Holdings LLP. For institutional or professional investors only.
Enjoying this content?
Get similar insights delivered straight to your inbox. Simply choose what you’re interested in and we’ll bring you our best research and market perspectives.
Thank you for joining our email preference center.
You’ll soon receive an email with a link to access and update your preferences.