- Multi-Asset Strategist
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Insights
- Capabilities
- About Us
- My Account
Our Funds
Fund Documents
Global Multi-Strategy Fund
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
Fixed income investors just experienced a “once-in-a-career” market correction: a 10% decline in the Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index (the “Agg”) through the first four months of 2022. For most allocators, this sharp downturn came in tandem with a painful equity market sell-off that has produced a -15% return for the S&P 500 Index year-to-date. It’s been rough sledding for traditional assets so far this year.
The forces behind the fixed income correction are by now familiar to market participants: rising interest rates, triggered largely by higher and stickier inflation than expected, and a scramble by the US Federal Reserve (Fed) to play “catch up” — in other words, to rein in inflation before a vicious cycle of surging wages and even higher prices takes hold. What now? I’m still hesitant to call a “top” for how high 10-year US rates might climb (beyond 3%) because the trajectory of future inflation remains highly uncertain, but I see tentative signs that we may be nearing a plateau. Below are four considerations that have me leaning that way.
1. How much monetary policy tightening is already priced in? A lot. As Figure 1 illustrates, according to the Fed Funds futures market, many investors now anticipate that the Fed Funds rate will reach 3.2% by the end of 2023, some 200 basis points (bps) higher than its current level of 75-100 bps. Fed Chair Powell was not particularly dogmatic when asked recently to identify a “neutral” Fed Funds rate, but he cited a range of 2.0%-3.0%. So, at 3.2%, the market apparently believes the Fed needs to pursue more restrictive monetary policy in order to “break inflation’s back.”
2. Is the economy responding to higher interest rates? The economy and markets seem to be reacting more to prospective Fed tightening than to actual tightening. Typically, the real economy responds to higher rates with a lag time of 6-12 months. However, as Figure 1 shows, a bellwether index of financial conditions (including mortgage rates, asset prices, credit spreads, and money supply) has already drifted lower in response to this year’s “rate shock” (i.e., a 150-bp spike in the 10-year Treasury yield). US manufacturing, home sales, and export data have also dropped lately, albeit from strong levels.
3. What will it take for the Fed to step back from tightening? Lower inflation and weaker demand. Last week, Chair Powell said it would likely take several months of lower core inflation for the Fed to retreat from its planned 50-bp rate hikes. Powell also mentioned “financial conditions” as something the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) will be watching closely, along with the labor market. Rising unemployment or any hints of growth dipping below trend might cause the Fed to pause on rate hikes.
There could also be a path forward where the market more or less “does the Fed’s work for it.” Indeed, it already has to some extent: Without having even tightened policy much (yet), the Fed’s more hawkish rhetoric has itself helped the fixed income market adapt to the reality of higher bond yields. Plus, a strong US dollar is also disinflationary. To preserve credibility, the Fed may need to meet the market’s already priced-in rate-hike expectations, but tougher financial conditions or falling inflation might give the Fed leeway to pull back from tightening.
4. What could go wrong from here? The Fed is in uncharted territory with regard to monetary tightening given: 1) the gap between current inflation and the Fed’s target; and 2) the use of tightening to pare back the Fed’s balance sheet, simultaneous with outright rate hikes. The Fed’s estimate that its balance sheet “run-off” is equivalent to only 25 bps of tightening seems quite low. Moreover, the Fed’s mistaken assumption last year that inflation would prove transitory delayed the beginning of its rate hikes. As a result of the Fed being “late to the game,” US monetary policy remains accommodative, with real (inflation-adjusted) 10-year interest rates still negative as of this writing.
Inflation is the wildcard: The Fed continues to believe higher commodity prices and supply-chain disruptions from the Russia/Ukraine war and China’s COVID lockdowns will ease. If they don’t, the Fed may decide to tighten policy more aggressively than the market currently expects. Under that scenario, Fed “overtightening” could tip the US economy toward recession, especially if paired with economic and market volatility from ongoing geopolitical turmoil or other sources. On the other hand, if the Fed pulls back and the market doesn’t believe inflation is under control, the Fed’s credibility is at risk.
1Positive carry is an investment strategy that involves investing borrowed money and then earning a profit on the difference between the return and the interest owed. Investors commonly use positive carry in currency markets.
Taking stock of the energy shock: 9 macro and market insights
Continue readingThe economy needs more competition. AI can make that happen.
Continue readingChart in Focus: Diversifying for different macro regimes
Continue readingA generational opportunity in publicly listed infrastructure?
Continue readingReinforcing core equity: The fundamental third pillar
Continue readingThe Fed’s growing footprint on the market has a cost
Continue readingAI isn’t like other tech cycles — and investors may need a new approach
Continue readingURL References
Related Insights
Taking stock of the energy shock: 9 macro and market insights
Macro Strategist Juhi Dhawan looks at the potential effects of the war in the Middle East on economic growth, inflation, policy, and corporate profits.
The economy needs more competition. AI can make that happen.
Brij Khurana believes that as AI evolves, it will challenge traditional business moats and revitalize competition across industries. This transformation could lead to increased productivity, higher real wages, and stronger economic growth.
Chart in Focus: Diversifying for different macro regimes
Against the backdrop of heightened geopolitical uncertainty, our experts Alex King and Joshua Riefler explore how to optimise diversification across different macro regimes.
A generational opportunity in publicly listed infrastructure?
What makes the current outlook for publicly listed infrastructure so compelling? For Portfolio Manager Tom Levering and Investment Director Joy Perry, the answer lies in strong demand dynamics, healthy return potential, attractive valuations — and burgeoning support from private capital.
Reinforcing core equity: The fundamental third pillar
Allocators are rethinking their core equity exposure. A more deliberate, three-pillar approach, blending quant and fundamental, can help improve outcomes.
The Fed’s growing footprint on the market has a cost
Brij Khurana explains what the Federal Reserve's balance sheet expansion may mean for inflation and asset prices.
How to reposition equity portfolios for recurring AI disruption
With a growing range of industries hit by sell-offs, Multi-Asset Strategist Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson explores how to reposition equity portfolios for recurring AI disruption.
Chart in focus: The long-term case for quality equity
Our equity experts highlight the resilience of quality equities despite recent setbacks, emphasizing their historical outperformance.
European equities: time to reassess?
Many investors remain cautious on European equities, but Multi-Asset Portfolio Manager Supriya Menon and Lead Researcher Patrick Wattiau argue it is time to consider what could go right for European equities.
Chart in Focus: Is AI a bubble, or is it driving real market value?
AI isn't just about the hype. Our experts explain why this innovation is driving real market value and lay out the investment implications.
AI isn’t like other tech cycles — and investors may need a new approach
AI may dominate headlines and strategy decks but people may still be underestimating its potential for disruption. What makes AI so different to other tech cycles?
URL References
Related Insights