- Investment Strategy Analyst
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Insights
- Capabilities
- About Us
- My Account
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
Every New Year, most of us come up with a list of resolutions to improve our personal and professional habits for the better. While encompassing a range of familiar aspirations — from the perennial attempts to adopt a healthier lifestyle to starting a hobby or becoming a better investor — these resolutions share a common theme in that most won’t last the month, defeated by practical realities and our natural biases.
Sometimes, however, good intentions do stick. In most cases, the secret of success comes down to targeting incremental rather than wholesale change and ensuring that the desired change is aligned with already well-established good practices. While the resulting improvements may seem minimal, if maintained and built on in the following years, they can eventually deliver durable progress.
Here is my attempt at setting four such resolutions. While not that different from the familiar objectives, they are deliberately limited in scope to make them more achievable. I hope that, along with my colleague Adam Berger’s annual checklist, they offer food for thought in what could be a momentous year.
We all know how, amid the media-amplified noise surrounding us, it is very easy to lose track of what really matters. Countering that tendency is hard, given our strong behavioural biases — whether it is fear of missing out or making judgements based on the most recent past. Personally, I am very lucky to be part of a team for whom focusing on clients’ long-term investment outcomes is part of its DNA, but I think there is still more that I can do. In practice, it means having the discipline to assess any asset allocation decision on its potential to move the needle in terms of outcomes. While it might be fun trying to predict the latest inflation print from the Bank of England or trading the relative value between South African and Portuguese equities, ultimately efforts in these areas need to be weighed up against their impact on risk and return.
Suggested steps:
Related perspectives:
Balancing bumps in the road and big-picture thinking in 2025
Another natural bias is to focus on familiarity, even if that is potentially to our own detriment. It's important to frequently reassess and challenge our long-standing beliefs and assumptions, both personally and professionally. This year, I think it is even more important to seek out different perspectives. Why do I say that? Because, superficially at least, there seems to be broad consensus about the likely direction of travel for 2025: bullish, with the US market outperforming. While there are good reasons to subscribe to this view and the continuation of US exceptionalism (as I do), consensus rarely gets it exactly right. 2023 was a good example of this. The vast majority of economists and strategists were forecasting a slowdown or recession, but neither materialised, and markets rallied.
Suggested steps:
Related perspectives:
Trump 2.0: Time to curb your enthusiasm?
A guide to investing in the age of anxiety
Good budgeting and planning make it much easier to find money for the things that really make a difference. If all the things we “need” are accounted for, it gives us more flexibility to spend on the things we “want”. Similarly, most investors may want to incorporate some active management but only have a limited “active budget” to work with. For this budget to be most cost effective, they need to focus it in areas where it is likely to yield the best outcomes. This year will be no different, meaning investors will need to consider carefully how much they want their active budget to be and how to use it. Answering these questions usually involves deciding to what extent you want the active management to come from leaning in and out of markets (active asset allocation) or from choosing between securities within those markets (security selection), with both likely to play an important role in 2025.
Suggested steps:
Related perspectives:
Concentrated markets: Implications for active management, manager research, and multi-manager capital allocation
My final New Year’s resolution is to be more active. Not by radically changing my lifestyle, but rather by making small tweaks to my daily routine. Likewise, for investors, I think 2025 could be a year in which selectively leaning into strategies that are more active and dynamic could reap rewards. This view is linked to the macroeconomic environment: worries about higher inflation, the potential impact this has on higher rates and more active government involvement in economies all point to higher dispersion between countries around the world and more dispersion between companies and securities. This should be an ideal environment for dynamic managers to capitalise on.
Suggested steps:
Expert
Inflation, volatility, and valuations: 3 reasons hedge funds fit today’s market
Continue readingIs AI taking over? Portfolio and productivity insights for asset allocators
Continue readingWhat does the new economic era mean for equities?
Continue readingSetting ROAs for 2026: A guide for US corporate and public plans
Continue readingURL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
Inflation, volatility, and valuations: 3 reasons hedge funds fit today’s market
Our multi-asset strategists explain why economic and market conditions in the year ahead could make a compelling case for adding hedge funds to the asset allocation mix, including multi-strategy and equity long/short hedge funds.
Are hedge funds the missing ingredient?
Inflation, volatility, and valuations — they all raise questions about portfolio diversification and resilience. Multi-Asset Strategists Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson and Adam Berger explain why multi-strategy and equity long/short hedge funds could provide the answers. They offer insights on adding allocations to a traditional portfolio mix and a recipe for manager selection.
Is AI taking over? Portfolio and productivity insights for asset allocators
Amid questions about corporate spending, valuations, and technology exposure, Global Industry Analyst Brian Barbetta and Multi-Asset Strategist Adam Berger take a deep dive on the AI landscape, offering investment insights and ideas for using AI to improve productivity.
What does the new economic era mean for equities?
The twists and turns of 2025 have reinforced the sense that the global economy is undergoing a structural shift — towards higher inflation, more volatile business cycles and a potential gradual unwinding of decades-long globalisation. However, with flexibility and careful positioning, there are reasons to be positive about the outlook for global equities
Setting ROAs for 2026: A guide for US corporate and public plans
How are pension plans adjusting their ROA assumptions? And how do those assumptions line up with our long-term capital market assumptions? Find out in this annual update.
Constructive, selective, resilient
Amar Reganti, a member of our Insurance team, explains why he believes insurers should remain selectively risk-on while prioritizing high-quality income and preserving flexibility to add risk as valuations improve.
Asset Allocation Outlook
How to evolve your portfolio for the latest market conditions? Explore the latest monthly snapshot of Wellington Solutions Group's asset class views.
The alpha advantage: Building retirement resilience
Client Portfolio Manager Dáire Dunne explains why the time horizon of retirement savers is well aligned with the potential of active management to deliver alpha. He examines the growing need for alpha, the importance of market inefficiency when pursuing it, and steps plan sponsors can take to help participants maximize the alpha advantage.
Can markets keep climbing the wall of worry?
Our multi-asset strategists analyze the market’s exuberance and share their overweight and underweight views on equities, credit, government bonds, and commodities.
Corporate versus credit indices: What’s the best match for liability-driven investing?
When selecting benchmarks for LDI needs, corporate DB plan sponsors often ask about the differences between investment-grade corporate and credit indices. In this paper, we compare the composition and performance of corporate and credit indices, as well as intermediate and long maturity indices, and we offer insights on choosing indices that fit a plan’s liability.
Rational exuberance: Will the bulls keep running?
Tariffs, fiscal challenges, geopolitical turmoil — lately, nothing has seemed to get the market down. We consider how long the good times may last in our quarterly look at the equity, bond, and commodities markets.
URL References
Related Insights