- Investment Specialist
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Insights
- Capabilities
- About Us
- My Account
United States, Institutional
Changechevron_rightThank you for your registration
You will shortly receive an email with your unique link to our preference center.
The views expressed are those of the authors at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
At time of writing, investors and market commentators are focused on the impact of (still) high inflation and subsequent monetary policy decisions on bond markets but they appear to have overlooked the potential consequences for currency risk. Yet, in our view, the new economic era we have entered entails not only more uncertainty and volatility in interest rates but also greater fluctuations in exchange rates. Hence, we believe understanding currency moves and how they impact economies can be an important asset in navigating increasingly volatile markets.
Currency intervention is a monetary policy action taken to moderate the pace or extent to which a currency appreciates or depreciates. This is done by changing the supply of the local currency and actively buying or selling foreign currencies at scale to reach the desired exchange rate. It is most often undertaken when the level of the local currency exchange rate is deemed to have moved out of alignment with underlying economic fundamentals. Policymakers buy or sell national reserves to stabilise the economy and control inflation by putting a stop to what is perceived to be excessive currency strengthening or weakening. While the line between currency intervention and manipulation can sometimes be blurred, large-scale interventions generally aim to address a broadly recognised imbalance in markets and often involve international cooperation or agreement. Occasionally, however, governments are accused of outright manipulation, attempting to unofficially distort the value of their currency to achieve a specific economic objective, most notably to (re)gain competitiveness in global markets and boost exports.
Lessons from the past
To be clear, intervention by policymakers to prop up or strategically devalue a currency is not new. As an example, in 1992, the UK withdrew sterling from the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) in a bid to stop speculative selling of the currency (an event known as “Black Wednesday”). At the time, the UK was slowly emerging from a steep recession caused by factors such as low competitiveness, high inflation and persistent current account deficits. However, policymakers kept interest rates high to prop up the value of sterling. When market participants became concerned that the currency’s exchange rate did not reflect these weaknesses, the monetary authorities responded with further rate hikes and then large-scale currency interventions. When these rate hikes and interventions became unsustainable, the UK abandoned the ERM, prompting a large-scale devaluation (Figure 1). While a brutal shock, it ultimately increased the UK’s competitiveness in global markets and spurred economic growth.
Similarly, other ERM currencies, most notably the Italian lira and Spanish peseta, went through various rounds of devaluations against the German mark, enabling them to maintain export competitiveness. And back in the 1980s, the G7 countries sought a strategic devaluation of the US dollar through coordinated efforts (the Plaza and Louvre Accords), with the aim of addressing major imbalances in the global economy.
Since the introduction of the euro, active currency intervention has mostly occurred in emerging markets, most notably in Argentina and Turkey. Among developed economies, the use of active currency management has been limited to Switzerland, as the safe-haven status of the Swiss franc has, at times, posed a risk for the Swiss economy and the effectiveness of its monetary policy.
However, intervention has become more frequent in the last two years. We have seen Japan’s Ministry of Finance step into markets with tens of billions of US dollars to shore up the value of the Japanese yen while the Chinese authorities appear to be allowing the renminbi to float more freely in global markets in an attempt to devalue the currency and improve competitiveness. There has even been speculation that some Trump advisers are in favour of including currency intervention in the US government’s economic toolkit, should the Republican Party regain control of the administration. While on the surface implausible, such a move would be bold and unprecedented in recent history.
The inevitable conclusion is that once a critical mass of countries engage in active currency manipulation, a sort of prisoner’s dilemma ensues: there is no advantage in not taking part. This has potentially significant implications for investors and allocators:
Experts
Loans from Federal Home Loan Banks: An opportunity for US insurers to enhance investment yield and total return
Continue readingWeekly Market Update
Continue readingBy
The growing capital intensity of the US corporate bond market
Continue readingTighter spreads, wider dispersion
Continue readingNo rerun of the 2022 rates scenario but flexibility is key
Continue readingGrowth outlook faces a new test: Inflation
Continue readingURL References
Related Insights
Get our latest market insights straight to your inbox.
Thank you for your registration
You will shortly receive an email with your unique link to our preference center
Loans from Federal Home Loan Banks: An opportunity for US insurers to enhance investment yield and total return
Learn why we believe FHLB loans provide compelling potential for insurers to add alpha or increase yield by borrowing at low rates and benefitting from possible favorable treatment by ratings agencies.
Monthly Market Review — May 2026
A monthly update on equity, fixed income, currency, and commodity markets.
Weekly Market Update
What do you need to know about the markets this week? Tune in to Paul Skinner's weekly market update for the lowdown on where the markets are and what investors should keep their eye on this week.
By
The growing capital intensity of the US corporate bond market
Members of our fixed income team explain how AI-driven capital expenditures are reshaping the US corporate bond market and creating potentially attractive opportunities, though selectivity is critical.
Tighter spreads, wider dispersion
Fixed Income Portfolio Managers Campe Goodman and Rob Burn share their midyear outlook for credit markets. They find that tight index spreads do not mean a lack of opportunity.
No rerun of the 2022 rates scenario but flexibility is key
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Martin Harvey and Investment Director Marco Giordano share their outlook for rates (government bonds) for the second half of the year.
Growth outlook faces a new test: Inflation
Explore our latest views on risks and opportunities across global capital markets.
A credit investor’s perspective on inflation, fiscal policy, and AI
Paul Skinner, Investment Director, and Connor Fitzgerald, Fixed Income Portfolio Manager. explore the forces shaping the economic landscape today, from the inflation outlook and the evolving role of fiscal policy, to the transformative impact of artificial intelligence on markets and corporate behaviour. Connor shares his perspective on where opportunities and risks are emerging across fixed income and what it all means for investors positioning their portfolios in an uncertain environment.
Emerging markets: cyclical recovery or secular opportunity?
In this ActiveViews webcast Portfolio Managers Bo Meunier and Gillian Edgeworth explore whether emerging markets are at a turning point.
Multiple authors
The Iran war is changing the bond playbook
Regional wars, inflation, and shifting fiscal priorities are creating new challenges for the bond market. Fixed income portfolio manager Brij Khurana explains why investors may need to look beyond traditional core bond markets for opportunities.
By
Chart in Focus: Inflation upends typical correlations
Fixed income expert Noah Atlas highlights how higher inflation expectations are disrupting stock-bond diversification and influencing portfolio construction.
URL References
Related Insights
© Copyright 2026 Wellington Management Company LLP. All rights reserved. WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT ® is a registered service mark of Wellington Group Holdings LLP. For institutional or professional investors only.
Enjoying this content?
Get similar insights delivered straight to your inbox. Simply choose what you’re interested in and we’ll bring you our best research and market perspectives.
Thank you for joining our email preference center.
You’ll soon receive an email with a link to access and update your preferences.
Monthly Market Review — May 2026
Continue readingBy