- LDI Team Chair, LDI Strategist, Portfolio Manager
United States, Institutional
Change
The views expressed are those of the authors at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
Key points
- We believe plan sponsors can seek to minimize funded-ratio volatility by focusing on three key liability risk factors: interest-rate, credit, and yield-curve risk.
- We think standard market indices can be blended to target all three risks, but that trying to perfectly hedge yield-curve risk can introduce unnecessary cost and complexity.
- Intermediate corporate bonds may help a liability-hedging benchmark evolve as the liability duration declines, particularly for frozen/mature plans.
- We believe plans should consider a dynamic approach to liability hedging that takes into account a plan’s overall asset allocation and return-seeking strategy, though a static liability benchmark can also be a fit for some plans.
- Plans approaching their “end state” may want to consider additional liability-hedging tools, including long-duration securitized assets and taxable municipal bonds (to mitigate issuer concentration and downside risk), intermediate corporate bonds (to expand the opportunity set), and return-seeking fixed income and other strategies that may enhance returns.
Many corporate defined benefit (DB) plans are revisiting their liability-hedging allocations and assessing new derisking ideas. As we discuss in part one of this paper, our core philosophy for constructing liability-hedging benchmarks remains unchanged. We continue to believe that thoughtful customization tailored to the liability’s key risk drivers goes a long way, but that attempting to perfectly match liability characteristics, especially across the yield curve, can result in unnecessary complexity and costs without a meaningful reduction in funded-ratio volatility.
At the same time, we believe there are a number of opportunities to enhance traditional liability-hedging benchmarks by capitalizing on recent market developments and preparing for the likely effects of future demand in the long-duration fixed income markets. In particular, part two of this paper highlights our research on several allocations that may complement long-duration corporate bonds, including long-duration securitized assets, intermediate corporate bonds, and return-seeking fixed income.
Part one: Our core philosophy for liability-hedging benchmark construction
While every plan has a unique cash flow and demographic profile, we’ve found that traditional (e.g., final average pay) pension liabilities are most sensitive to changes in a few key risk metrics. Specifically, we believe most plans can seek to minimize funded-ratio volatility by managing liability-hedging portfolios benchmarked to a blend of…
To read more, please click the download link below.
Experts
- LDI Strategist and Portfolio Manager
Related insights
Read Next
Showing
of
Insights Posts
Article
18 min
Corporate versus credit indices: What’s the best match for liability-driven investing?
When selecting benchmarks for LDI needs, corporate DB plan sponsors often ask about the differences between investment-grade corporate and credit indices. In this paper, we compare the composition and performance of corporate and credit indices, as well as intermediate and long maturity indices, and we offer insights on choosing indices that fit a plan’s liability.
18 min
Article
2026-09-30
Whitepaper
16 min
Setting ROAs for 2025: A guide for US corporate and public plans
How are pension plans adjusting their ROA assumptions? And how do those assumptions line up with our long-term capital market assumptions? Find out in this annual update.
16 min
Whitepaper
2025-11-30
Article
5 min
Why more corporate plans should pass on pension risk transfers
LDI Team Chair Amy Trainor explains why she believes a pension risk transfer may, in many cases, not be the best choice for fully funded plans from a cost/benefit standpoint.
5 min
Article
2025-11-30
Article
3 min
Time to derisk? Funded status up, but potential volatility ahead
LDI Team Chair Amy Trainor explains why US corporate DB plans may have a rare and limited opportunity to derisk and offers suggested action steps.
3 min
Article
2025-05-06
Whitepaper
Liability-hedging diversifiers: What’s on your pension’s playlist?
Corporate pensions moving closer to their end state may benefit from more diversified liability-hedging allocations. To help, LDI Team Chair Amy Trainor offers a liability-hedging diversifiers “playlist” — a set of asset classes and strategies that may harmonize well with a variety of objectives, from downside mitigation to long-term outperformance versus long corporate bonds.
Whitepaper
2024-10-31
Article
While it has been a painful start to the year for credit investors, Portfolio Manager Connor Fitzgerald sees a structural case for intermediate credit and a potential near-term window of opportunity.
Continue reading
Article
2023-06-30
URL References
Related Insights