- Fixed Income Credit Analyst
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Insights
- Capabilities
- About Us
- My Account
United States, Intermediary
Changechevron_rightThe views expressed are those of the authors at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
The recent downturn in certain segments of the commercial real estate (CRE) sector, namely office properties, has significant ramifications for major cities because property taxes play a significant role in funding municipal operations.
Against this backdrop, we ask: Which cities could be most affected by a prolonged decline in commercial office values? Our findings indicate that large cities may be sufficiently insulated from even a severe, elongated downturn given the strength of their balance sheets and the diversity of their revenue streams.
In recent years, the health of state and local government credits has improved noticeably — it’s strong relative to historical standards. This improvement is partially the result of generous direct and indirect federal support during the pandemic and partially the result of sustained tax growth.
One potential challenge to local government credit quality is the notable decline in office values that has come about due to the shift to hybrid work schedules and tightening credit conditions, among other factors. As property taxes are a major component of local general obligation credits, we’ve decided to analyze how office valuation declines could impact major US cities.
We found that large cities should be positioned strongly enough to withstand even more severe declines effectively. Large cities may be more resilient in these scenarios because they tend to have more durable balance sheets, mainly because of their wide range of revenues. Cities usually benefit not only from property taxes, but also from sales taxes, income taxes, and intergovernmental transfers.
Like other governmental credits, city balance sheets have been buoyed by growing tax revenue (partially driven by inflation), federal aid, and manageable expenditure growth. This gives cities ample room to absorb the tax impact of office valuation declines, especially if it isn’t paired with other major revenue impacts like income tax declines or residential real estate declines (Figure 1).
To uncover the potential impact of office value declines on city balance sheets, our municipal bond investment team ran three scenarios based on different potential declines in office valuations. Our base, bear, and ultra-bear cases analyze a 15%, 30%, and 50% decline in office valuations, respectively (Figure 2).
Figure 2 highlights that the impact by major city varies, but even in the most severe ultra-bear scenario, the budget decline figures are generally less than 5%, and the years-of-cash-supply figure is almost always greater than five. We can see that among our pool of large cities, Boston is the most affected on a budget-decline basis given its dependence on property taxes and its higher tax rate for commercial real estate. Relative to cash on the balance sheet, New York is the most affected in each scenario.
We believe the years-of-cash columns in Figure 2, which show how many years the city can absorb a predicted budget decline with just the cash on its balance sheet, are noteworthy. These range from seven years (New York) to 130 years (Philadelphia) in the bear case. We believe that this exposure is manageable because under the ultra-bear scenario, even New York, with an estimated 26% decline of available cash, can absorb that impact for four years with only its existing cash cushion.
It’s worth noting that this analysis assumes there will be no other adjustments in revenues or reductions in expenditures, which would not necessarily be the case in a more extreme bear scenario. Additionally, this decline would likely happen over at least two years, which gives cities more time to react than our table accounts for.
The bottom line is that while certain segments of the commercial real estate sector may have struggled of late, large cities are prepared to weather any subsequent storms, thanks to their durable balance sheets and diverse revenue streams.
Experts
Are US election probabilities now a critical driver of bond yields?
Continue readingTime for credit selection to shine
Continue readingBond Market Outlook
Continue readingMultiple authors
Capitalizing on rate shifts: Parsing opportunities in the second half
Continue readingReframing fixed income portfolios: why bond maths makes the difference
Continue readingJune FOMC meeting: May disinflation is welcome, but is not enough for a rate cut
Continue readingHas the European credit cycle been extended?
Continue readingURL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
You've been subscribed
Thank you for subscribing. You can manage your subscription using the links provided in any of our subscription emails.
Are US election probabilities now a critical driver of bond yields?
Our expert argues that the US election remains a critical catalyst for the bond market given the contrast between both parties as it relates to supply side policies such as trade and immigration, and to policy differences around taxation and regulation.
Time for credit selection to shine
Fixed income investors continue to seek answers to an era of volatile rates. Large, static exposures to credit markets no longer cut it. Instead, a nimble and dynamic approach is more likely to create resilient and consistent total return outcomes.
Bond Market Outlook
Our fixed income experts assess how to capitalize on market volatility with a flexible and dynamic approach that leverages diverse high-yielding opportunities and manages risks carefully.
Multiple authors
Capitalizing on rate shifts: Parsing opportunities in the second half
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Campe Goodman and Fixed Income Strategist Amar Reganti discuss how to capitalize on potential rate shifts in the second half of the year
Reframing fixed income portfolios: why bond maths makes the difference
It is easy to understand why fixed income investors tend to focus on yields. But investors who focus too much on yield may run the risk of overpaying for income and underestimating the impact of price volatility.
June FOMC meeting: May disinflation is welcome, but is not enough for a rate cut
Fixed Income Analyst Caroline Casavant discusses what June's FOMC meeting tells us about the US Federal Reserve’s latest thinking on interest-rate cuts.
Has the European credit cycle been extended?
2024 has kept fixed income investors busy. Yet, despite lingering inflation and rate volatility, European credit markets have remained strong. Are we looking at an extended credit cycle? And if so, what does this mean for investors?
Governments have been slow to reduce their fiscal deficits — it could cost them
Our expert explores the investment implications of continued excessive deficit spending by G7 countries.
Looking beyond yield: Rethinking the approach of fixed income investing
Investors face a new regime, challenging traditional assumptions about returns and volatility. With central bank interventions impacting credit markets, it’s time to rethink income allocations. Rather than fixating solely on yield, consider a dynamic approach, presented by Connor Fitzgerald.
Structuring core fixed income: A constructive view on market and macro conditions
Head of Multi-Asset Strategy Adam Berger and Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Connor Fitzgerald discuss the interest-rate environment and the fundamental picture in investment-grade credit and high yield.
New era demands a nimble approach to credit
Our expert explains why deep research and an active approach are effective ways for fixed income investors to uncover credit opportunities in today's market.
URL References
Related Insights
© Copyright 2024 Wellington Management Company LLP. All rights reserved. WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT ® is a registered service mark of Wellington Group Holdings LLP. For institutional or professional investors only.