- Investment Director
Wellington Homepage
ChangeThe views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
After a prolonged period of quantitative easing (QE), there are tentative signs that Japan may finally join other developed economies in reversing course. The journey towards normalisation is, however, fraught with danger as highlighted by the UK’s example, when inappropriate polices caused a sharp sell-off in sterling and UK government bonds (gilts) that threatened the stability of its pensions system. Could Japan, with a debt-to-GDP ratio of close to 250% and a still fragile economy, be the next country to experience such an event given rapidly rising yields?
The most obvious counterargument is that the Bank of Japan (BOJ) is acutely aware of the risks to financial stability and will only proceed very gradually towards normalisation. In practice, this may be hard to achieve as illustrated by the markets’ reaction to the BOJ’s only limited relaxation of its yield curve control programme at the end of 2022. A scenario whereby the BOJ is forced into a much faster-than-intended exit of its QE programme should not be discounted. On the face of it, such a forced exit could pose a systemic challenge to the Japanese pension system, which would be similar to what occurred in the UK but with even more far-reaching consequences given Japan’s status as the world’s largest net creditor.
While there are some parallels between both countries’ pensions systems and policy dilemmas, there is no simple read-across. On balance, the risk of Japan experiencing something akin to the UK pension crisis appears moderately low, due to differences in valuation methodology and leverage across both pension systems.
Differences in pension sectors
Discount rate — In Japan, the valuation of defined benefit pension fund liabilities is based on a constant discount rate, whereas in the UK it is based on a market-consistent discount rate at the time of the valuation. As such, the value of UK pension fund liabilities can swing dramatically when long-term interest rates move, whereas those of its Japanese peers remain largely stable.
Usage of leverage — Over the years, UK pension funds have faced significant pressure to reduce potentially volatile interest-rate-risk exposure through liability-driven investment (LDI) strategies. The weak funding position of many schemes meant, however, that implementing these hedges involved significant amounts of leverage (as high as three times), using repos and swaps. The sharp jump in UK gilt yields triggered by the UK’s mini-budget caused these swap positions to move into the red. Schemes were forced to sell their liquid assets to cover the ensuing margin calls, creating a vicious cycle that was only stopped by the Bank of England’s intervention. By contrast, Japanese pension funds usually do not rely on derivatives-based LDI strategies, meaning they do not face the risk of unexpected liquidity calls.
Overall, pension funds in Japan tend to have limited leverage. Figure 1 provides a high-level overview of the type and total amount of assets held by Japanese pension funds. It illustrates that Japanese pension funds have historically not been heavy users of derivatives (black line), despite a prolonged period of ultra-low yields, reflecting both risk aversion among pension boards and a lack of in-house operational expertise.
Figure 1
Foreign investors also worry that heightened domestic or international volatility could force Japanese pension funds into a fire sale of their foreign assets, but that concern ignores the critical role of these foreign assets in a typical Japanese pension portfolio. For instance, Japanese public pension funds invest roughly 25% each in domestic and foreign bonds as well as domestic and foreign equities. Given that these foreign holdings are such a crucial part of their strategic portfolio allocation, it is unlikely that Japanese pension funds will sell these foreign bonds outright for the time being. Instead, any future fund flows are likely to occur through rebalancing activity between each cohort of their target allocations.
In summary, the Japanese pension sector is unlikely to face a systemic crisis as seen recently in the UK given key differences between both systems, most notably valuation methodology and derivatives usage. This is not to say that the sector is immune to the potential market stress that may accompany Japan’s exit from QE. However, any uptick in volatility is expected to be temporary and far from a systemic shock.
Expert
Related insights
Showing
of
Insights Posts
Shareholder activism in Japan: Integrating ESG within the investment process
Continue reading
Quick Take
2024-09-30
Shareholder activism in Japan: How our engagement approach drives value
Continue reading
Quick Take
2024-08-31
URL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
Read next
Showing
of
Insights Posts
Should investors prepare for a rate hike in Japan?
Investment Directors Marco Giordano and Masahiko Loo discuss why a rate rise in Japan may occur sooner than markets expect.
Quick Take
2024-12-31
Shareholder activism in Japan: Integrating ESG within the investment process
In the final article within our series on shareholder activism in Japan, ESG Analyst Soo Ho Jung shares how the Japan equity team integrates ESG to help realize value for investors.
Quick Take
2024-09-30
How to interpret the Bank of Japan’s latest policy shift
We analyse the wide-ranging investment implications of the Bank of Japan's latest policy shift.
Quick Take
2024-08-31
Shareholder activism in Japan: How our engagement approach drives value
Equity Portfolio Manager Katsuhiro Iwai introduces the Japan equity investment team's approach to engagement, sharing a number of successful recent case studies.
Quick Take
2024-08-31
Activism – History and evolution in Japan
Investment Specialist Toshiki Izumi examines the history of shareholder activism in Japan, with particular emphasis on the differences between current and historical attitudes toward activism.
Quick Take
2024-06-30
Is the long-awaited change in Japan’s fortunes finally materialising?
Portfolio Manager Dan Maguire explores why Japan may finally be exiting deflation and assesses the opportunities this structural change could create for small- and mid-cap equities.
Article
2024-04-30
New BOJ governor: Dove, hawk… or owl?
Investment Director Masahiko Loo and Client Portfolio Manager Jitu Naidu discuss potential implications of the upcoming “changing of the guard” at the BOJ.
Quick Take
2024-03-31
Why global investors should watch the Bank of Japan
Macro Strategist John Butler explores why global investors should watch the Bank of Japan and what is likely to happen next.
Quick Take
2024-01-31
Bank of Japan policy shift: Waiting for the other shoe to drop?
Client Portfolio Manager Jitu Naidu and Investment Director Masahiko Loo share their take on the consensus view that Japan has reached several key inflection points.
Quick Take
2023-01-31
Will Japanese buyers look beyond USD fixed income? They may have to
With the US Federal Reserve’s (Fed’s) interest-rate-hiking cycle now underway, it’s an important time to keep a close eye on non-US buyers of US dollar (USD) fixed income securities.
Continue reading
Quick Take
2022-07-31
The fish are biting: Exploiting Japan’s inefficient equity market
Our Japanese equity team has shown Japan to be one of the world’s most inefficient markets, making it a good “fishing pond” for alpha-seeking active managers who do their homework and apply a strong investment process.
Continue reading
Quick Take
2021-12-31
URL References
Related Insights