- Macro Strategist
United States, Intermediary
Change
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
With divided government in the US sure to limit the prospects for new legislation, trade policy is likely to be a key area of focus for the Biden administration over the next two years. At the annual meeting of the National Association for Business Economics in October, I had the opportunity to speak with US Trade Representative Katherine Tai and I came away with five conclusions that encapsulate shifting US trade priorities and could have important economic implications.
1. Free-trade agreements concerned solely with liberalization and tariff elimination are history. Instead, the pillars of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, launched in 2022, would seem to be a better indication of the new direction of US trade policy: Along with the traditional trade pillar (in this case, focused on the digital economy), the stated priorities include supply chains, infrastructure, decarbonization, and governance. The last includes effective tax and anticorruption policies as its goals. This innovative framework brings together 14 nations, representing 40% of global GDP and 60% of the world population. I will be keeping an eye on how this evolves in 2023, especially as the US tries to reposition its trade footprint in Asia away from China.
2. The decoupling of the US and China will remain top of mind. Acknowledging that the two countries are in competition with each other, Ambassador Tai explained the use of Section 301 tariffs as a tool for level-setting the policy field. This tool would serve to facilitate the strategic realignment of priorities given the buildup of issues around intellectual property, innovation, and technology transfers with China over time, suggesting less room to maneuver in bringing these tariffs meaningfully lower. The review of these tariffs is ongoing, and the public has been given the chance to weigh in. I would expect to hear a lot more on this issue, perhaps early in 2023 now that the mid-term elections are behind us.
3. Trade policy is now more focused on standards and not strictly on market access. The Biden trade agenda includes goals related to sustainability, inclusion, and resiliency. This administration has found allies in Europe for sustainability and inclusion goals and in emerging markets for goals related to inclusion, as well as investments required for the rerouting of supply chains and the buildout of infrastructure. The US/EU Trade and Technology Council, launched in 2021 to enhance competitiveness, fosters collaboration with allies on issues like labor and the environment, which are critical to sustainable trade policy.
4. US trade policy could now serve as a complement to US industrial policy. This means the costs of past trade liberalization efforts, such as fragile supply chains, de-industrialization, offshoring, and the decimation of manufacturing communities, would be considered as a counterbalance to market access. As industrial policy rebalances, trade policy, which sits at the nexus of domestic and foreign policy, also adapts. Note how the pillars of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework encompass the goals of sustainability, inclusion, and resiliency, which also drove the passage of the CHIPS Act, the Infrastructure bill, and the Inflation Reduction Act (US industrial policy).
5. Enforcing trade rules is an area of focus for the administration. Since the passage of the US/Mexico/Canada Agreement (USMCA), more legal cases have been brought up to ensure that the letter of the law is followed in practice. Recall that the USMCA includes both labor and environmental protection clauses. We’re likely to see similar scrutiny around deals with the rest of the world.
Expert
Related insights
Showing
of
Insights Posts
Video
5 min
Rapid fire questions with Schuyler Reece on EM debt
Continue reading
5 min
Video
2027-06-30
Article
11 min
Top of Mind: Next-generation diversifiers for a changing market landscape
Continue reading
11 min
Article
2028-05-31
URL References
Related Insights
Read next
Showing
of
Insights Posts
Video
5 min
Rapid fire questions with Schuyler Reece on EM debt
In this edition of “Rapid fire questions,” fixed income portfolio manager Schuyler Reece shares his read on the evolving macro backdrop amid the Middle East conflict, why he remains constructive on emerging markets debt, and where he sees the most compelling opportunities and risks across hard currency, local debt and EM currencies.
5 min
Video
2027-06-30
Article
11 min
Top of Mind: Next-generation diversifiers for a changing market landscape
Multi-Asset Strategist Adam makes a case for a set of “next-generation diversifiers” — asset classes that may help protect portfolios against equity downside and other risks in the market environment investors are likely to face in coming years.
11 min
Article
2028-05-31
Article
18 min
Quarterly Market Review — 1Q2026
A monthly update on equity, fixed income, currency, and commodity markets.
18 min
Article
2027-04-30
Article
18 min
Monthly Market Review — March 2026
A monthly update on equity, fixed income, currency, and commodity markets.
18 min
Article
2027-04-30
Article
6 min
Approach AI with an open mind
Our experts profile how accelerating AI, infrastructure demand, software disruption, and labor impacts may reshape risks and opportunities across global markets.
6 min
Article
2027-05-31
Article
12 min
One battle after another: Time to reset expectations?
How might the historic energy shock impact portfolio decisions in the coming months? We offer our take on the implications for equities, bonds, and commodities.
12 min
Article
2027-05-01
Article
4 min
Iran ceasefire – risk deferred, not removed
The US and Iran have announced a two-week ceasefire. While this reduces immediate tail risk, Geopolitical Strategist Thomas Mucha cautions against mistaking it for a resolution. What should investors be watching now?
By
4 min
Article
2027-05-31
Article
6 min
Europe and the Iran conflict: 4 critical considerations for investors
Macro Strategists Eoin O’Callaghan and Nicolas Wylenzek explore how the conflict in the Middle East may alter the outlook for Europe and outline potential implications for European fixed income and equities.
6 min
Article
2027-04-13
Article
6 min
Taking stock of the energy shock: 9 macro and market insights
Macro Strategist Juhi Dhawan looks at the potential effects of the war in the Middle East on economic growth, inflation, policy, and corporate profits.
6 min
Article
2027-03-31
Article
4 min
The economy needs more competition. AI can make that happen.
Brij Khurana believes that as AI evolves, it will challenge traditional business moats and revitalize competition across industries. This transformation could lead to increased productivity, higher real wages, and stronger economic growth.
By
4 min
Article
2027-03-25
Article
4 min
Investment implications of the conflict in the Middle East
Geopolitical Strategist Thomas Mucha discusses the strategic complexities of the Middle East conflict, underscoring the importance of active management and diversification in investment portfolios.
By
4 min
Article
2027-05-01
URL References
Related Insights
Quarterly Market Review — 1Q2026
Continue readingBy