- Macro Strategist
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Capabilities
- Insights
- About Us
Asset classes
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed.
It is so easy to get lost in the weekly market gyrations and constant flow of headlines, but it is worth taking a step back and looking at the bigger macro picture. And that broader perspective suggests that we are currently in a “twilight zone”, caught between two conflicting world views:
While the prevailing narrative supports high nominal growth and therefore risk assets, it comes at a price. And the longer it goes on, the greater the risk of a sudden reversal as reality gains the upper hand and markets start questioning the impact of the current stimulus on government debt sustainability.
All central banks are cutting rates or are expected to do so in the near term. The only market debate is how fast and by how much. Moreover, most major countries are loosening fiscal policy. And, yet as we discussed in our mid-year outlook, more stimulus may not be what the world needs right now, given:
Yes, the world could be “saved” by the rapid investment in AI and a wave of deregulation as both have the potential to raise productivity and give the cycle longevity. There are tentative signs that AI may lead to a rapid improvement in productivity, but it is also likely that some of the capital flowing into AI may be misallocated or that near-term gains may be overhyped. Likewise, deregulation can boost productivity by removing unnecessary hurdles, but we should not discount the risk of unintended consequences that are ultimately negative for productivity. At the same time, the opposing forces of ageing demographics, reduced migration and deglobalisation are gathering pace. It is impossible to tell what the net timing and net impact of these countervailing forces will be.
What we know, however, is that neither fiscal nor monetary policy appears to be overly tight. Yet, interest rates globally are still coming down while governments are conducting the largest and most coordinated fiscal loosening outside COVID since 2010, when global unemployment was double today’s rate and inflation was less than 1%.
Tariffs are certainly causing macro volatility but ultimately equate to a relative growth shock with differing impacts between countries and segments of the economy. With all large countries loosening policy into still tight labour markets, high nominal growth (and inflation) is likely to stay and that should remain a good environment for risk assets.
However, inflation-led growth does not constitute a “Goldilocks” scenario as it eventually will necessitate higher rates, especially as governments have failed to let high inflation erode their debts and keep building up deficits. At some point, bond markets will demand higher compensation for this profligate policy. It could also mean that yield curves keep steepening from here.
There is the distinct possibility that markets move abruptly out of today’s twilight zone and push government bond yields to levels that were unthinkable a few years ago, with major implications for all risk assets. Today, investors can take advantage of the favourable environment for risk assets. However, they may also want to consider preparing their portfolios for a very different environment, by optimising diversification and ensuring they have built in the necessary flexibility to respond to the associated risks and opportunities.