Finland, Intermediary

Changechevron_right
menu
search

Bonds in Brief: Making Sense of the Macro — February issue

4 min read
2027-03-31
Archived info
Archived pieces remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older pieces.
923317900
Marco Giordano, Investment Director
923317900

Welcome to February’s edition of Bonds in Brief, our monthly assessment of risks and opportunities within bond markets for fixed income investors. Each month, we explore material macro changes and how best to navigate the latest risks and opportunities we see within bond markets.

Key points

  • Fixed income markets generated positive total returns in February as concerns over AI-driven disruption contributed to safe-haven demand for government bonds. Credit spreads widened amid macro uncertainty, AI-driven sector repricing, tariff announcements and geopolitical risk, but strong fundamentals, attractive all-in yields, diversification potential and investor demand should continue to provide support for investment-grade bonds.
  • US and Israeli military strikes on Iran began on 28 February, marking a major escalation in a long-running confrontation. Bond markets experienced a brief “flight-to-safety” rally, but this quickly reversed amid concerns about an energy-driven supply shock raising inflation expectations and constraining central bank easing. The US Federal Reserve and Bank of England are now expected to cut rates less than twice over the rest of the year, while the European Central Bank is priced for hikes for the first time since early 2026 and the Bank of Japan is still expected to raise rates at least twice this year.
  • The US Supreme Court invalidated the Trump administration’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs, prompting a shift to a temporary import surcharge under Section 122 of the Trade Act. This allows tariffs of up to 15% for 150 days and, while largely untested, preserves most of the previous tariff framework. Further tariff actions are likely once the 150-day window expires, and ongoing lawsuits from companies seeking to recover tariff payments are keeping trade policy squarely in focus for markets.
  • Gilts outperformed other developed market bonds, buoyed by the Bank of England’s dovish stance, rising unemployment and expectations of future rate cuts, though these expectations shifted quickly after the Iran strikes. Despite improved headline inflation, core inflation remains above target, suggesting policymakers are prioritising economic stability over immediate progress on inflation.

What are we watching?

  • US-Iran conflict and policy responses. The escalating US-Iran conflict threatens to become a prolonged, destabilising regional campaign, with Iran expanding its attacks on energy infrastructure in key countries. The greatest immediate macroeconomic risk is the disruption of energy production and shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, which may drive up inflation and hamper global growth. Given the scale of the potential inflationary or growth shock, a long-lasting conflict could trigger wider risk-off sentiment. Policymakers’ responses, especially regarding fiscal support, are likely to be significant, as governments may use fiscal measures again to shield households from inflation despite ongoing budget deficits.
  • Commodities and inflation. Oil prices have been quick to respond to the conflict, and a persistent spike in energy prices could drive both headline and core inflation higher globally. At this stage, the likely hit to growth from higher energy prices remains unclear, as does the need for fiscal offsets. An energy-driven cooling of growth could, in fact, be what economies need to bring inflation back to target. Paradoxically, fiscal support to protect consumers could entrench inflation unless offset by productivity gains from AI, especially since unemployment rates remain low and wage growth is consistently above 2% in most countries. Europe is particularly vulnerable to energy shocks due to its reliance on gas imports, but recent gas price movements are less severe compared to the significant spikes seen from 2021 to 2023.
  • Technology sector obsolescence. Recent AI driven volatility, particularly within the software sector, has reignited concerns about technology obsolescence risk. From a credit perspective, we do not view AI as an immediate threat to the survival of most technology issuers. Instead, we think it is likely to drive greater dispersion between those companies that successfully adopt AI and those that fall behind, with potential second-order impacts on margins, free cash flow and leverage over time. While AI introduces some longer-term uncertainty regarding terminal value, most technology and software issuers currently have strong fundamentals, solid cash-flow generation and flexible balance sheets. This supports a measured, issuer-specific approach to managing obsolescence risk.
  • Stock/bond correlations. Following the strikes in Iran, global equity and rates markets reacted in tandem: risk-off sentiment led to equity sell-offs, while inflation concerns drove rates higher. February saw a reemergence of the textbook diversifying relationship between stocks and bonds. While ongoing high inflation could challenge this relationship, the likelihood of significant negative total returns in fixed income appears limited given today’s elevated yield levels.

Where are the opportunities?

  • We continue to believe that total return fixed income strategies unconstrained by benchmarks are best positioned to navigate the later stages of the economic and credit cycle, which we expect to coincide with bouts of volatility. Central banks are charting divergent policy paths, creating dispersion in growth and inflation and increasing the likelihood of market dislocations. Structural tailwinds, fiscal stimulus, deregulation and robust AI-driven capital investment should keep the backdrop constructive, but elevated valuations across most sectors mean success will hinge on selectivity and discipline.
  • In an increasingly volatile and uncertain market environment, we see core fixed income, whether aggregate or credit strategies, as potentially increasingly appealing from both an income and capital protection perspective. In our opinion, all-in yields remain attractive for investors looking to derisk or diversify away from domestic government bonds, providing a potentially smoother return profile. And for European investors, we believe that high-quality income may offer an attractive avenue not just in local but also global markets.
  • In our view, emerging market debt has potential as both a return driver and a diversifier in fixed income allocations, particularly for European investors. Barring unanticipated shocks, we believe it has the potential to make a positive contribution to well-diversified portfolios through carry, potential rate compression and ongoing US dollar weakness.
  • We think high-yield debt also offers potential, but we would advocate a cautious approach given market uncertainty and current spread levels. At the same time, the robust additional income potential may make high yield a good equity substitute should investors want to derisk. For all higher-yielding credit, we believe an “up-in-quality” issuer bias and careful security selection are warranted.

The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional or accredited investors only.

Expert

Get our latest market insights straight to your inbox.

Read more from our experts