- Geopolitical Strategist
- About Us
- My Account
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
It’s been a year since the start of the tragic Russia/Ukraine conflict, which has seen hundreds of thousands of military and civilian casualties. This geopolitical crisis remains a significant market and macro event with an uncertain end, and it presents the very real possibility of further escalation.
On this somber anniversary, I believe we can begin to assess some of the most important longer-term geopolitical, macro, and market outcomes that investors should consider.
Almost none of my national security contacts in Washington, Brussels, or elsewhere across the EU believe we are close to seeing an end to the largest military crisis in Europe since World War II. On the contrary, we may see additional, increasingly intense fighting.
This is because both Kiev and Moscow are taking steps that will likely lengthen the hostilities. From Ukraine’s perspective, the Zelensky government continues to acquire not only the increasingly advanced and sophisticated weapons it needs to launch both defensive and offensive operations against Russian troops, but it’s also benefiting from increased training and intelligence sharing with NATO countries.
Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin is accelerating Russia’s troop-mobilization efforts, while attempting to bolster the country’s defense and industrial bases. We’ve also seen ongoing shifts in Russian military leadership structure, and in recent weeks, new momentum around Russian offensive operations.
Accordingly, battlefield dynamics — the most important variable to monitor — are fluid. Thus, the list of potential outcomes is wide, ranging from a military collapse by either side to regime change.
As for worse-case scenarios, the crisis remains in an escalatory phase, including the slim (but not zero) possibility that military action spreads to NATO countries or, potentially, triggers the use of tactical nuclear weapons.
This military clash remains a geopolitical crisis of the highest order and has already transformed the global security environment in important ways.
First, the conflict has strengthened the US/transatlantic alliance across economic, political, and especially military dimensions. We didn’t see this degree of political unity during the previous US administration, but it’s now likely to continue beyond the current situation in Ukraine, as is a deepening transatlantic policy focus on national security. As has been demonstrated countless times in history, hostility and tragedy at this scale is clarifying to policymakers.
Second, the onset of the conflict prompted NATO to extend an invitation to Finland and Sweden. This speaks to the fact that the fighting in Ukraine has produced a new security environment across Europe — an institutionalized response that will likely constrain Moscow’s military options in Europe in the long term.
The clash in Ukraine has also resulted in large boosts in defense spending across Europe. This comes at a time when militaries around the world are modernizing their forces and assessing new technologies in use on Ukraine’s battlefields. While political unity in the EU will likely be a persistent challenge given differing domestic priorities, I suspect these defense spending increases and doctrinal military shifts are structural and will outlive the conflict’s end.
Last, but not least, the situation in Ukraine could impact China’s complex relationships with the US and governments across Europe.
I believe that prolonged fighting in Ukraine could lead to accelerated great-power competition among some of the world’s strongest countries, including (but not necessarily limited to) the US, China, and Russia. This could be particularly true if Moscow is seen as continuing to launch attacks against Ukrainian civilians and infrastructure, in addition to military targets.
It will also likely sharpen the political narrative in Washington that the world is splitting into “democracies and autocracies.” The resulting global geopolitical instability could add further fuel to deglobalization efforts rooted in strategic sectors on the front lines of great-power competition, including semiconductors, biotech, critical minerals, artificial intelligence, and quantum technologies, among other industries.
Finally, the crisis in Ukraine is likely to produce several long-term macro and investment outcomes that will, in my view, outlive military action.
The crisis in Ukraine is likely to produce several long-term macro and investment outcomes that will, in my view, outlive military action.
First, we’ve seen extraordinary coordination between the US and its European allies on the sanctions front. This is likely to continue well into 2023 as the conflict drags on and could be a precursor for allied sanctions aimed at future geopolitical crises around the world.
The situation in Ukraine, of course, has also focused policymaker attention — and voters — on the critical role of energy not only in Europe, but globally. In particular, it has refocused efforts to wean European economies from Russian oil and natural gas. As such, it’s also placed greater attention on speeding up the EU’s decarbonization efforts.
Both of these developments will likely lead to profound shifts in how investors should think about energy long into the future, particularly as great-power competition — and the still uncertain outcome of the Russia/Ukraine conflict — continue to shape global policy and security backdrops.
Why the change of direction in Germany warrants close attentionContinue reading
Reasons for optimism about Indian equitiesContinue reading
Generative AI: Separating hype from opportunityContinue reading
Seven observations on the latest US/China executive orderContinue reading
Investing in the age of great-power competitionContinue reading
Why the change of direction in Germany warrants close attention
Macro Strategist Nicolas Wylenzek assesses the shifts underway in Germany and Europe more broadly, including the recent surge in the far right's popularity and the challenges associated with the energy transition.
Reasons for optimism about Indian equities
Our experts explain why, despite criticisms that Indian equities trade at higher valuations today than they have historically, they may have the potential to help drive total returns over time.
Generative AI: Separating hype from opportunity
Two of Wellington's tech experts join host Thomas Mucha to discuss the rapidly evolving AI landscape and separate hype from reality, highlighting everything from the industries most likely to be impacted to AI's geopolitical implications.
Seven observations on the latest US/China executive order
Geopolitical Strategist Thomas Mucha shares his analysis of the recent Biden administration executive order, which aims to restrict investment into certain sectors in China, and details the potential investment implications.
Investing in the age of great-power competition
As competition between great powers intensifies, a new global order is taking shape. Geopolitical Strategist Thomas Mucha explores the investment implications of a more fragmented and fractious world.
FX outlook: Is USD exceptionalism withering away with the Fed hiking cycle nearing an end?
Discover the status of the USD today, learn where the greenback may be headed going forward, and understand why.
Fixed income 2023: Will opportunity keep knocking in the second half?
Learn where Fixed Income Strategist Amar Reganti sees opportunities in the fixed income market today and dive deeper into the three key themes he thinks investors should consider going forward.
Emerging markets health care: Ready for takeoff?
Global Industry Analyst Sue Su shares her sanguine outlook on the health care sector in emerging markets, especially in China, which represents the largest opportunity in this space.
Decoding the effects of deglobalization
Nicholas Petrucelli outlines the economic, political, and geopolitical underpinnings of deglobalization. He also demonstrates the impact this trend has today and analyzes the investment implications.
Debt and dysfunction in Washington: The US hits the ceiling (again)
Global Investment Strategist Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson talks to Macro Strategist Mike Medeiros about the US debt-ceiling showdown and considers its potential investment implications.
Fintech regulation: Geopolitics, ESG, and crypto
Discover how fintech’s growing role as a national strategic imperative impacts regulations, the effect of ESG on regulation, and the specific need for regulation in crypto markets.