Driven by their attractive risk and return profile in recent years, interest in multi-strategy hedge funds continues to grow. So, amid all this attention, what should potential investors know about these approaches?
In this article, we briefly cover what multi-strategy approaches do, outline how and why they’ve been successful historically, and share a framework for how to incorporate these strategies in different portfolios.
What is a multi-strategy approach?
Multi-strategy approaches are designed with the goal of delivering a consistent return outcome irrespective of underlying economic and financial market conditions. This means that whether equities or bonds go up or down in price, a modern multi-strategy fund seeks to remain immune to those fluctuations and deliver a positive and consistent performance outcome over time. So how does this work in practice?
We believe the key to success lies in the power of diversification. Often referred to as “the only free lunch in investing,” diversification in a multi-strategy approach can be attained by allocating to a wide collection of independent, specialized trading strategies that seek to generate profits in different ways. This could mean investing in distinct asset classes, using systematic or fundamental investment processes, or trading with different time horizons. By combining a range of these unique strategies and tightly managing their aggregate risk, multi-strategy funds have the potential to provide considerable portfolio-level diversification.
Why consider a multi-strategy investment? Potential for consistency in the face of uncertainty.
We believe multi-strategy funds that seek to provide an all-weather profile are particularly important in today’s persistent economic and geopolitical uncertainty. Elevated inflation, high levels of debt, and regional conflicts are among the macro trends that suggest we may continue to experience heightened volatility in financial assets for years to come. As shown in Figure 1, multi-strategy approaches have been a clear standout over the recent volatile period when compared to a traditional 60/40 asset allocation.