- Fixed Income Analyst
Switzerland, Institutional
ChangeThe views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) raised the target federal funds rate by 75 basis points (bps), to a range of 2.25% to 2.50%, at its July 2022 meeting. The FOMC made no change to its plans regarding the ongoing reduction of its balance sheet, which began in June.
The rate increase, which was largely priced into markets, occurred as US inflation rose and the labor market remained strong. In recent weeks, however, manufacturing data has signaled slowing US economic growth. In addition, the US Treasury (UST) yield curve has inverted, meaning that the yield on shorter-dated UST debt now exceeds the yield on longer-dated UST debt — which, historically, has often portended recession.
Recession risks and inflation pressures have increased
The US Federal Reserve’s (Fed’s) own models of economic growth and inflation suggest that the risk of stagflation — rising inflation paired with falling growth — has increased. Going into the July meeting, the Atlanta Fed’s GDP measure indicated that the rate of change for second-quarter GDP was negative, while the New York Fed’s GDP measure showed slowing growth since the June FOMC meeting. At the same time, the most recent print of the Dallas Fed’s Trimmed Mean Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE), an important gauge of core inflation pressures, came in at 4.0%. Most concerningly, it indicated that over half of the component prices of PCE had increased at an annual rate of more than 5%.
Taken together, these datapoints present a dilemma for the Fed. On one hand, signs of moderating economic growth suggest that removal of monetary policy accommodation could increase the risk of a US recession. On the other hand, the momentum in inflationary pressures implies that failure to remove policy accommodation could cause inflation expectations to increase.
Labor market strength persists, dampening near-term recession fears
While slowing manufacturing data and an inverted UST yield curve can be leading indicators of a recession, not all of the available data suggests that a recession is imminent or inevitable. In particular, the Fed is attentive to the continued resilience of the US labor market: The unemployment rate has remained near historic lows at 3.6%, while workers’ wages have continued to increase (although wage growth is negative in real terms). Initial jobless claims have ticked up slightly of late, but remain well below the elevated levels that prevailed for most of 2020 and 2021. Until the labor market deteriorates meaningfully, the Fed will likely continue to prioritize the removal of monetary policy accommodation in an effort to combat inflationary pressures.
Inflation expectations remain the key Fed policy determinant
When the Fed pivoted from enacting a 50-bps rate hike to a 75-bps hike at its June FOMC meeting, Chair Jerome Powell cited upward moves in survey-based measures of inflation expectations as a key driver of its policy shift. Since that time, survey-based measures of inflation expectations have come off their highs but remain elevated. Likewise, Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS)-implied “breakeven” rates have dipped as energy prices have stabilized, but both the 5-year and the 10-year breakeven rates remain solidly above 2% as of this writing.
Indicators of inflation expectations will continue to be important inputs to Fed monetary policy going forward. Given the uncertainty about the economic outlook, the Fed would prefer to hike rates as little as possible, provided inflation expectations remain consistent with its mandate to keep average inflation at around 2%. Any material increases in inflation expectations would likely necessitate more aggressive removal of policy accommodation, whereas material decreases could bring the Fed’s current rate-hiking cycle to an earlier end than what’s now priced into markets.
Final thoughts for investors
In addition to its “price stability” and “maximum employment” goals, the Fed also takes its “financial stability” mandate seriously. With market volatility elevated and apt to remain so, the Fed will try to avoid contributing to that volatility with its words and actions, if it can. Absent an exogenous macro shock, I expect the Fed’s balance-sheet normalization to proceed as planned for the next few months. Its monetary policy will be informed by both incoming inflation data and labor market data. Given that recent data indicates more change in the former than the latter, the risk to interest rates for the foreseeable future appears to be to the upside.
Expert
Related insights
Showing
of
Insights Posts
Securitized assets: Caught in the storm but with scattered bright spots
Continue reading
Quick Take
2024-03-31
URL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
Read next
Showing
of
Insights Posts
Securitized assets: Caught in the storm but with scattered bright spots
Securitized assets have been on the front lines of the ongoing turmoil in the banking sector, but not all securitized subsectors appear equally vulnerable.
Quick Take
2024-03-31
Deep and diverse: Welcome to today’s Asia credit market
Two of our Singapore-based experts on Asia credit discuss the market's key features, along with how it's evolved and is likely to continue doing so.
Whitepaper
2024-03-31
On to the next crisis: Glimpsing a post-SVB world
Amid the turmoil in the US banking sector, Global Investment Strategist Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson suggests investors consider pivoting to a “risk-management mode” that favors higher-quality assets. (Published 14 March 2023)
Quick Take
2024-03-31
SVB collapse: What are the implications?
Multi-Asset Strategist Supriya Menon shares her latest perspectives on the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank Financial Group (SVB) and the unfolding implications for investors. (Published 14 March 2023)
Quick Take
2024-03-31
Tight money: Banks feeling the squeeze of higher rates
In this curated collection, some of our experts share their latest perspectives on the ongoing turmoil in the US banking sector and its potential implications.
Collection
2024-03-31
Understanding the US banking sector shake-up
Investment Communications Managers Jitu Naidu and Adam Norman detail recent US bank failures and analyze the implications. (Published 15 March 2023)
Quick Take
2024-03-31
What does the new macro regime mean for investors?
In this Q&A with two senior market practitioners we explore what the new macro regime means for investors and what to expect next.
Article
2024-03-31
India: Structural tailwinds for 2023 and beyond
Following his recent trip to India, Macro Strategist Tushar Poddar shares why he's very positive on the country's medium- to longer-term structural outlook.
Quick Take
2024-03-31
New BOJ governor: Dove, hawk… or owl?
Investment Director Masahiko Loo and Client Portfolio Manager Jitu Naidu discuss potential implications of the upcoming “changing of the guard” at the BOJ.
Quick Take
2024-03-31
Three themes that could define 2023 for income investors
With several macro crosscurrents at play, Portfolio Manager Peter Wilke suggests that income-oriented investors not lose sight of the “big picture” in their quest for yield.
Quick Take
2024-01-31
Peak inflation, back to goldilocks? Not so fast
Portfolio Manager Nicholas Petrucelli explains why the market could be underestimating just how complex and volatile the global economic cycle is and details the implications for inflation.
Quick Take
2024-02-29
URL References
Related Insights