- Investment Strategy Analyst
Skip to main content
- Insights
- Capabilities
- About Us
- My Account
Asia ex-Japan, Institutional
Changechevron_rightThe views expressed are those of the authors at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
The bravado of the Liberation Day tariff announcements, framed as a “declaration of economic independence,” sought to employ draconian measures to force a rapid rebalance of global trade, with 10% baseline tariffs and country-specific tariffs as high as 145%. Markets were caught off guard and likewise rapidly began to plummet. Investors who sold, fearing the implications of an abrupt end to globalization, would be dismayed when a 90-day moratorium announced a week later sent markets skyrocketing on hopes for a better trade outcome.
Following drawdowns, markets can often snap back and retrace losses quickly. While the catalysts vary over time, history has often made the case for staying invested. Since 2000, a formal market correction (i.e., exceeding -10%) has occurred roughly every other year on average, including in many years ending in significant positive territory. 2025 is no different, with investors who missed out on the April 9 bounce back lagging the S&P 500 by an astonishing -8.7% year to date as of writing.
We may not be out of the woods on final tariff policy, but remaining engaged with the market and building a diversified portfolio to withstand periods of volatility could be perennial tried and tested advice for investors.
Experts
Top of Mind: Three surprises — and one common thread
Continue readingCongress changes, geopolitical risk doesn’t
Continue readingSeeking income without stretching for risk
Continue readingMultiple authors
US midterm elections: Why they matter for markets
Continue readingQuarterly Market Review — 3Q26
Continue readingThe rally: Refusing to yield?
Continue readingURL References
Related Insights
Top of Mind: Three surprises — and one common thread
Multi-Asset Strategist Adam Berger examines three market surprises — geopolitical fragmentation, AI’s accelerating potential, and rising long-term interest rates — and their implications for investor portfolios.
Congress changes, geopolitical risk doesn’t
What does a Democratic sweep of Congress mean for investors? Beneath the political volatility, the structural direction remains remarkably consistent.
Seeking income without stretching for risk
In this quarter’s outlook, our team highlights opportunities for insurers to build durable income, alongside insights on tax-loss harvesting and regulatory developments.
Multiple authors
US midterm elections: Why they matter for markets
Macro Strategist Juhi Dhawan and Geopolitical Strategist Thomas Mucha explore what's at stake in the US midterm elections what the outcome may mean for investors in the longer term.
Monthly Market Review — September 2026
A monthly update on equity, fixed income, currency, and commodity markets.
Quarterly Market Review — 3Q26
A quarterly update on equity, fixed income, currency, and commodity markets.
The rally: Refusing to yield?
Find out why we remain constructive but increasingly selective as AI investment supports equities, rising yields create opportunities in government bonds, and geopolitical risks complicate the outlook.
US utilities: What data center politics could mean for investors
Rising US data center electricity demand is fueling new opportunities for utilities as well as political pushback in this US midterm election season. Learn how regulation, affordability, and grid pressures could potentially affect investors.
Multiple authors
Resilient growth, rising risks: Investing through the energy shock
Macro Strategist Eoin O’Callaghan explores the drivers of resilient growth amid the continued energy shock and discusses why investors need to keep a close eye on evolving macro conditions.
Income investing in the Warsh Fed era: What investors should consider
How should income investors be positioned for a Warsh-led Fed? Our experts believe it begins by rethinking fundamentals, and being more deliberate and adaptive.
Multiple authors
September FOMC: Doves capitulate
For the first time in over three years, the Fed raised the target rate range to 3.75%-4.00% in September. Our team looks at what's driving the shift and what it means going forward.
URL References
Related Insights
© Copyright 2026 Wellington Management Company LLP. All rights reserved. WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT ® is a registered service mark of Wellington Group Holdings LLP. For institutional or professional investors only.
Monthly Market Review — September 2026
Continue readingBy