- US Macro Strategist
- About Us
- My Account
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
The US rating has once again been downgraded below AAA, this time by Fitch. Recall that S&P’s downgrade (also to AA+) in 2011, which followed stalled debt ceiling negotiations, precipitated a spike in market volatility and a flight-to-quality rally that benefited…US Treasuries. The sharp decline in US Treasury yields following that announcement indicated that market participants didn’t question the willingness of the US to make good on its debts and reinforced the status of Treasuries as a safe-haven asset. Today’s market reaction is more muted, with yields modestly higher and some (including Treasury Secretary Yellen) questioning the timing of the decision.
While the timing of Fitch’s decision was never clear, the outcome has been a long time in the making due to constant willingness to pay issues and, more importantly, a deteriorating public-sector backdrop with no credible plan to put it on a sustainable trajectory over the next 10 years. While there do not appear to be many significant forced selling issues due to the loss of AAA status, I think this formal acknowledgment is important for several reasons.
At the margin, this downgrade increases the probability that term premium (extra yield compensation for longer-term bonds) will start to rise due to both ability and willingness to pay concerns at a time when foreign Treasury holdings have been in structural decline.
Critically, there are fundamental reasons for a higher-term premium absent a downgrade, including, but not limited to:
At a minimum, it could increase market focus on the public-sector debt trajectory, which has been ballooning since the pandemic. On a stand-alone basis, this debt burden should be a negative for the US dollar. Other developed market countries also face deteriorating public-sector backdrops, although I think governance concerns due to polarization and constant debt ceiling debates are unique to the US.
The important medium-term question is whether this downgrade represents a catalyst for US Congress to devise a credible fiscal plan. There have been various members of Congress (for example, Senators Romney and Manchin) pushing for such an outcome, but in practice the steps necessary — broadening the revenue base and reducing entitlement spending — are politically unpalatable. Both are politically challenging, especially with an election 15 months away. Neither side has put forward a credible plan, let alone one that would actually reduce debt levels, based on calculations by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
This said, any signs of progress toward another Simpson-Bowles type of deficit reduction plan would be notable especially as it relates to the long end of the yield curve, which could otherwise be vulnerable to moving higher. If Congress fails to rein in spending and continues to play chicken with the debt ceiling, the backlash in the form of higher borrowing costs from large holders of US Treasuries could be much more punitive than the actions of rating agencies.
Macro implications of the AI revolution: is the market right?Continue reading
The “cleanest dirty shirt” now has too many stainsContinue reading
Fed not yet willing to declare victory on inflationContinue reading
How to interpret the Bank of Japan’s latest policy shiftContinue reading
Chair Powell maintains optionalityContinue reading
Macro implications of the AI revolution: is the market right?
Macro Strategist John Butler sets out an initial framework to help answer key questions about the potential macro impact of artificial intelligence.
The “cleanest dirty shirt” now has too many stains
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager posits that US fiscal profligacy will change the game for asset allocators.
Fed not yet willing to declare victory on inflation
We think the Fed is done raising rates for this cycle, despite the likelihood that they are being overly optimistic about inflation. Read to find out why.
How to interpret the Bank of Japan’s latest policy shift
We analyse the wide-ranging investment implications of the Bank of Japan's latest policy shift.
Chair Powell maintains optionality
Fixed Income Analyst Caroline Casavant shares what she thinks matters most for investors in light of the latest interest-rate hike from the Fed.
Fed skips along the path to a pause
Jeremy Forster analyzes the Federal Reserve's decision to pause its interest-rate hiking cycle, explains why he believes it could be an extended pause, and shares the potential implications for fixed income markets.
Blue bonds: long-awaited innovation or yet to make a splash?
Blue bonds – which aim to support projects related to ocean conservation – are on the rise. How effective are they and what do investors need to know before they invest?
4 reasons why European investors may benefit from going global
Bonds are looking increasingly attractive, but a new, more volatile, normal means investors with a home bias may wish to revisit portfolios. An inconsistent policy landscape and lower hedging costs are just some of the reasons why European investors in particular may benefit from going global.
New BOJ governor: Dove, hawk… or owl?
Investment Director Masahiko Loo and Client Portfolio Manager Jitu Naidu discuss potential implications of the upcoming “changing of the guard” at the BOJ.
Diversifying styles to survive today’s bond market
In a challenging year for fixed income markets, members of our Fundamental Factor team highlight a bright spot: the momentum factor in global government bond and corporate credit markets.
2023 Macro and rates outlook: Goodbye easy money, hello regime change
Macro Strategist John Butler highlights the impact of macroeconomic "regime change" on global inflation and interest rates, with potential implications for investors.