Sweden, Intermediary

Changechevron_right
menu
search

Bonds in Brief: Making Sense of the Macro — January issue

4 min read
2027-02-28
Archived info
Archived pieces remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older pieces.
923317900
Marco Giordano, Investment Director
923317900

Welcome to January’s edition of Bonds in Brief, our monthly assessment of risks and opportunities within bond markets for fixed income investors. Each month, we explore material macro changes and how best to navigate the latest risks and opportunities we see within bond markets.

Key points

  • Fixed income markets generally delivered positive total returns in January amid headlines still dominated by policy and geopolitical uncertainty. Spreads tightened modestly across most sectors, leading to excess returns compared to government bonds.
  • US President Donald Trump nominated former US Federal Reserve (Fed) Governor Kevin Warsh as the next Fed chair. Warsh took a hawkish stance as a Fed governor, but his recent comments align with Trump’s call for easier monetary policy. The Fed held rates steady in January, but investors continue to expect rate cuts this year as inflation drifts lower.
  • Encouraging European economic data released in January, including more consistent German and European manufacturing growth and improved UK growth, points towards a broader recovery in industrial production beyond a likely pick-up in military equipment, but potentially higher inflation.
  • At the World Economic Forum, President Trump ruled out the use of military force to acquire Greenland but reaffirmed its strategic importance to US national security and introduced the concept of a “framework” agreement, signalling that Washington intends to pursue its objectives through diplomatic and economic negotiations. While reducing the tail risk of direct US-NATO military confrontation, the issue now appears set to evolve into a prolonged and complex bargaining process.

What are we watching?

  • Iran. Geopolitical risk remains elevated as major unrest in Iran coincided with an active military exchange between Iran and Israel, with both sides trading strikes and markets pricing a higher geopolitical risk premium. Oil prices spiked following these escalations, reflecting concerns about potential disruption risks around the Strait of Hormuz even if worst‑case scenarios remain a small tail risk. While Iran retains meaningful proxy and missile capabilities, the broader worry is that any misstep could draw the US more directly into the conflict, raising the tail risk of a wider regional confrontation and keeping volatility elevated across energy markets and risk assets.
  • Accelerating global growth. The latest data continues to support a “Goldilocks” scenario of continued growth and inflation normalising towards 2% across most developed markets. However, this narrative rests on a series of narrow assumptions, and the failure of any one of these could derail this scenario. The risks to the downside include an unexpected downgrade in growth expectations or productivity enhancements from AI; the private sector reacting to increased fiscal stimulus by boosting savings; an unexpected geopolitical shock; and potentially tighter financial conditions if policymakers try to rein in inflation or if bond markets respond to government policies they view as inappropriate by increasing long-term interest rates, as we’ve seen recently in Japan.
  • Japanese policy and the US dollar. Heavy trading after the Bank of Japan’s 23 January policy meeting prompted rumours of coordinated Japanese and US intervention to stop the yen weakening versus the US dollar. Rumours intensified after reports that the US Treasury had requested a “rate check”, which could mark the start of a more explicit weaker-dollar policy stance. Together with renewed tariff threats and concerns about the US institutional framework, this could further accelerate diversification away from US assets.
  • Fixed income flows remained strong, with European investors allocating more than €350 billion to the asset class in 2025. According to Morningstar, active fixed income strategies made up €310 billion of this flow, exceeding 2024’s €259 billion and highlighting a growing shift in asset allocations as investors diversify away from other asset classes and look to address concentration, particularly in US equities. Many of our institutional and wealth clients remain underweight in fixed income in their strategic asset allocations and any further shifts towards fixed income could result in significant flows into bond markets, representing a positive tailwind.

Where are the opportunities?

  • The risks of a recession remain modest, yet tariffs are also likely to add to the current inflationary impulse. Given these dual risks, our key conviction remains a focus on higher-quality total return strategies that are less constrained by benchmarks. This could include global sovereign and currency strategies (especially those that diversify US-dollar exposure) that allocate across multiple sectors. In our view, a nimble approach, with appropriately scaled allocations to liquid assets such as government bonds, could potentially enhance portfolio resilience without sacrificing returns.
  • In a still volatile and uncertain market environment, we see core fixed income, whether aggregate or credit strategies, as potentially increasingly appealing from both an income and capital protection perspective. In our opinion, all-in yields remain attractive for investors looking to derisk or diversify away from domestic government bonds, providing a potentially smoother return profile. And for European investors, we believe that high-quality income may offer an attractive avenue not just in local but also global markets.
  • In our view, emerging market debt has potential as both a return driver and a diversifier in fixed income allocations, particularly for European investors. Barring unanticipated shocks, we believe it has the potential to make a positive contribution to well-diversified portfolios through carry, potential rate compression and ongoing US dollar weakness.
  • We think high-yield debt also offers potential, but we would advocate a cautious approach given market uncertainty and current spread levels. At the same time, the robust additional income potential may make high yield a good equity substitute should investors want to derisk. For all higher-yielding credit, we believe an “up-in-quality” issuer bias and careful security selection are warranted.

The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional or accredited investors only. 

Expert

Get our latest market insights straight to your inbox.

Read more from our experts