With over 30 years of experience analysing and investing in infrastructure, our team has never seen a better opportunity to invest. In many ways, we believe that the current investment opportunity within infrastructure is generational.
In 2026 and beyond, the attractiveness of this opportunity can be seen through four closely related lenses, which we illustrate in this piece through the energy theme, with a primary focus on electricity and natural gas. We acknowledge that geopolitical tensions — such as those sparked by recent conflict in the Middle East — have periodically exposed vulnerabilities in LNG shipping routes. We continue to monitor such volatility when it arises but see it as distinct from the long term case for gas infrastructure. Here are the four lenses we refer to:
- First, we see the broader structural growth opportunity as exceptional.
- Second, the risk/return trade-off has clearly improved, as returns are rising with no commensurate risk increase.
- Third, we believe valuations remain attractive, particularly considering the higher growth and return potential.
- Fourth, financing this growth has become easier, as private infrastructure is providing lower-cost capital to help fund publicly listed infrastructure’s massive growth.
Why is growth genuinely different this time?
We’re familiar with the energy “trilemma” that drives structural demand for infrastructure: energy needs to be reliable, affordable and sustainable. Today, that trilemma has become a “quadrilemma”. Energy still needs to be reliable, affordable and sustainable — but now power supply needs to grow to meet surging demand.
The energy transition continues to drive power demand, making electricity the fastest growing form of energy over the past decade and likely beyond. Currently, a new source of demand is emerging. Specifically, AI is causing electricity demand growth to be multiple times greater in developed markets than we observed in previous decades.
Meeting this demand has been complicated by a decade in which the developed world focused more on shutting down power plants than building new ones. Rapid growth in renewables has met some of this demand but has created the need for even more infrastructure (e.g., wires, battery storage and flexible/baseload generation). The increasing need for flexible and baseload generation is particularly evident in the improving near-term growth outlook for gas-fired generation and the medium-term growth outlook for nuclear power.
Power generation is only one component of meeting growing power demand. In much of the developed world — especially where renewables have scaled quickly — generation capacity has outpaced the grid’s ability to transmit and distribute power. At the same time, much of the grid is simply old. As such, the need for capital investment in developed market power grids now sits in the high-single-digit percentage range, approximately double historical levels.
Together, growth in power generation and power networks point to a sustained, long-term investment need, not just in 2026, but well into the coming decades.
How has the risk/reward trade-off changed?
We believe regulated utilities sit at the centre of today’s structural demand shift. There’s a growing understanding that utilities are essential for economic growth, whether to support AI-driven power demand, the energy transition or broader trends around reshoring. One consequence of this has been a more supportive regulatory environment.
The regulatory environment matters to investors because regulators are allowing utilities to earn higher returns. Over the past two years, regulators in the US and Europe have increased the returns that utilities are allowed to earn. Combined with clear, long dated regulatory frameworks, investors have unusually high visibility into future cash flows and returns.
Importantly, we believe that achieving these higher returns does not entail utilities taking on significant incremental risk. As a result, regulated utilities offer an opportunity to access higher growth through themes like AI or electrification — while avoiding much of the uncertainty that comes with them. AI provides a clear example. Increasingly, utilities and regulators are requiring hyperscalers to secure power supply though long-term agreements, priced at a premium (to protect residential consumers) and structured on a take-or-pay basis. In this way, utilities can shift the risk from themselves and consumers to the hyperscalers.
Aren’t investors having to overpay for higher growth and returns?
While valuations have bounced from their lows, utilities in both the US and Europe continue to trade at levels that we see as attractive relative to the demand growth backdrop, suggesting that much of this growth has yet to be fully reflected in prices.