- About Us
- My Account
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
Equity markets fell dramatically last Friday after US Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Jerome Powell delivered a short speech at the Fed’s annual Jackson Hole conference. In my view, two things made Powell’s latest speech more hawkish than his prior comments this year:
Powell’s latter statement struck me as particularly hawkish given the further supply-chain disruptions that might result from the ongoing European gas crisis.
The question is: Why did Powell feel the need to sound a decidedly more hawkish note in his statements last week?
Over the past several weeks, the Fed has been actively trying to “push back” on the market’s interpretation of recent economic data releases — such as the lower-than-expected July inflation print (8.5%, down from 9.1% in June), as well as weaker GDP growth numbers. At the beginning of August, the market was pricing in that the Fed would hike its policy rate to 3.5% by early 2023, but then engage in a rate-cutting cycle until the policy rate reached 2.75% by the end of 2023. Powell felt it was time to set the record straight and redirect the market narrative that had taken hold.
While Powell’s words and tone last week certainly surprised (read: unnerved) markets, I believe the Fed has considerably more policy flexibility now that the fed funds rate is closer to the central bank’s definition of “neutral” — the rate at which monetary policy is neither contractionary nor expansionary. The Fed now faces three key decisions:
The Fed seems intent on moving rates quickly above neutral in an effort to anchor inflation expectations; however, there is a fair amount of consensus within the Fed these days that the peak rate it will need to target is somewhere in the neighborhood of 3.5% to 4.25% — and that it anticipates holding the policy rate there for at least two years.
However, the Fed is now in “data-dependent” mode and, as such, the answers to these three questions might change going forward based on incoming information.
The most important data the Fed will be watching in the months ahead will come from the US labor market. The last nonfarm payrolls employment report was exactly the opposite of what the Fed wanted to see. We had really strong job growth (i.e., labor demand), yet the labor force participation rate has continued to fall (i.e., less labor supply). I believe the Fed will want to see job growth slow and/or labor supply increase in order to change its policy stance.
On the inflation front, we learned through Powell’s speech that even if realized inflation did top out in June 2022, the Fed is very focused on anchoring inflation expectations. Market-implied measures of inflation expectations are within the Fed’s preferred range, but survey-based measures remain too high for the Fed’s comfort. Unfortunately for markets, we also learned last Friday what the Fed is not planning to take into account in its monetary policy decisions: slowing economic growth and the effect on markets that higher interest rates are likely to have.
Featured unique perspectives
Fed not yet willing to declare victory on inflation
We think the Fed is done raising rates for this cycle, despite the likelihood that they are being overly optimistic about inflation. Read to find out why.
Three themes (and what they mean) for income investors
With several macro crosscurrents at play, Portfolio Manager Peter Wilke suggests that income-oriented investors not lose sight of the “big picture” in their quest for yield.
Financials amid rising dispersion
We explore why we believe dispersion across stocks, sectors, and geographies is supporting numerous secular themes in long/short investing in financials.
US regional banking sector update
We explore how banking regulation and legislation could impact US regional banks, including highlighting the potential for M&A activity and for dispersion to drive long/short opportunities.
After the US downgrade: Thoughts on public debt, bond yields, and Fed policy
In the wake of the US debt downgrade by Fitch, Macro Strategist Juhi Dhawan explains what worries her most about the nation's debt situation and considers the impact on the term premium and the Fed’s plans.
Why cash won’t cut it for long: The case for bonds
Global Investment and Multi-Asset Strategist Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson and Investment Strategy Analyst Patrick Wattiau explore the relative potential benefits of bonds versus cash.
How to interpret the Bank of Japan’s latest policy shift
We analyse the wide-ranging investment implications of the Bank of Japan's latest policy shift.
Chair Powell maintains optionality
Fixed Income Analyst Caroline Casavant shares what she thinks matters most for investors in light of the latest interest-rate hike from the Fed.
Fed skips along the path to a pause
Jeremy Forster analyzes the Federal Reserve's decision to pause its interest-rate hiking cycle, explains why he believes it could be an extended pause, and shares the potential implications for fixed income markets.
Europe/US divergence: the ECB has further to go
How far will Europe diverge from the US? Macro Strategist Eoin O’Callaghan sees several reasons sustaining this growing divergence.
When the US sneezes, does the world still catch a cold?
Macro Strategist John Butler discusses the growing potential for cyclical and monetary policy divergence, despite markets pricing for the contrary, and assesses what it means for investors.