United Kingdom, Institutional
Changechevron_right
Sustainable Investing
Stewardship Principles
Investment Solutions
Funds
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
The US rating has once again been downgraded below AAA, this time by Fitch. Recall that S&P’s downgrade (also to AA+) in 2011, which followed stalled debt ceiling negotiations, precipitated a spike in market volatility and a flight-to-quality rally that benefited…US Treasuries. The sharp decline in US Treasury yields following that announcement indicated that market participants didn’t question the willingness of the US to make good on its debts and reinforced the status of Treasuries as a safe-haven asset. Today’s market reaction is more muted, with yields modestly higher and some (including Treasury Secretary Yellen) questioning the timing of the decision.
While the timing of Fitch’s decision was never clear, the outcome has been a long time in the making due to constant willingness to pay issues and, more importantly, a deteriorating public-sector backdrop with no credible plan to put it on a sustainable trajectory over the next 10 years. While there do not appear to be many significant forced selling issues due to the loss of AAA status, I think this formal acknowledgment is important for several reasons.
At the margin, this downgrade increases the probability that term premium (extra yield compensation for longer-term bonds) will start to rise due to both ability and willingness to pay concerns at a time when foreign Treasury holdings have been in structural decline.
Critically, there are fundamental reasons for a higher-term premium absent a downgrade, including, but not limited to:
At a minimum, it could increase market focus on the public-sector debt trajectory, which has been ballooning since the pandemic. On a stand-alone basis, this debt burden should be a negative for the US dollar. Other developed market countries also face deteriorating public-sector backdrops, although I think governance concerns due to polarization and constant debt ceiling debates are unique to the US.
The important medium-term question is whether this downgrade represents a catalyst for US Congress to devise a credible fiscal plan. There have been various members of Congress (for example, Senators Romney and Manchin) pushing for such an outcome, but in practice the steps necessary — broadening the revenue base and reducing entitlement spending — are politically unpalatable. Both are politically challenging, especially with an election 15 months away. Neither side has put forward a credible plan, let alone one that would actually reduce debt levels, based on calculations by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
This said, any signs of progress toward another Simpson-Bowles type of deficit reduction plan would be notable especially as it relates to the long end of the yield curve, which could otherwise be vulnerable to moving higher. If Congress fails to rein in spending and continues to play chicken with the debt ceiling, the backlash in the form of higher borrowing costs from large holders of US Treasuries could be much more punitive than the actions of rating agencies.
Expert
FOMC: Stable policy amid market volatility
Continue readingToo much focus on Fed, not enough on fiscal
Continue readingFed’s projections yielded mixed results this year — what’s in store for 2024?
Continue readingBond Market Outlook
Continue readingMultiple authors
Macro implications of the AI revolution: is the market right?
Continue readingBy
URL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
You've been subscribed
Thank you for subscribing. You can manage your subscription using the links provided in any of our subscription emails.
FOMC: Stable policy amid market volatility
The Fed is holding steady amid market turmoil. See our quick notes on the FOMC's March policy statement, forecasts, and the Fed chair's press conference.
Too much focus on Fed, not enough on fiscal
Current US fiscal and monetary policy stances argue for risk taking in fixed income.
Fed’s projections yielded mixed results this year — what’s in store for 2024?
Our Fed watcher opines on 2023 policy and looks ahead to 2024.
Bond Market Outlook
In this collection fixed income experts across our platform highlight risks and opportunities for discerning fixed income allocators looking ahead to the second half of 2023.
Multiple authors
Macro implications of the AI revolution: is the market right?
Macro Strategist John Butler sets out an initial framework to help answer key questions about the potential macro impact of artificial intelligence.
By
Why cash won’t cut it for long: the case for bonds
Current elevated cash yields are certainly tempting, but our Investment Strategy team's research suggests that holding cash at this point in the cycle could create a return drag relative to fixed income.
Fed not yet willing to declare victory on inflation
We think the Fed is done raising rates for this cycle, despite the likelihood that they are being overly optimistic about inflation. Read to find out why.
How to interpret the Bank of Japan’s latest policy shift
We analyse the wide-ranging investment implications of the Bank of Japan's latest policy shift.
Chair Powell maintains optionality
Fixed Income Analyst Caroline Casavant shares what she thinks matters most for investors in light of the latest interest-rate hike from the Fed.
Fed skips along the path to a pause
Jeremy Forster analyzes the Federal Reserve's decision to pause its interest-rate hiking cycle, explains why he believes it could be an extended pause, and shares the potential implications for fixed income markets.
URL References
Related Insights
© Copyright 2024 Wellington Management International Ltd. All rights reserved.
WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT FUNDS ® is a registered service mark of Wellington Group Holdings LLP.
Wellington Management International Limited. Registered in England and Wales 04283513. Registered office: Cardinal Place, 80 Victoria Street, London SW1E 5JL, United Kingdom. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority of the United Kingdom.
For professional investors and intermediaries only. This content is not suitable for a retail audience.
we’d love your feedback!
Help us improve our website. For every short survey taken, we give 2 to the Wellington Management UK Foundation to support educational charities helping economically disadvantaged children in EMEA.
The “cleanest dirty shirt” now has too many stains
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager posits that US fiscal profligacy will change the game for asset allocators.
By
Brij Khurana