- Head of Multi-Asset Strategy – APAC
- About Us
- My Account
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
Among investors pursuing long-term objectives like retirement, there is an understandable tendency to focus on the accumulation of assets. But as populations around the world age and need to tap into accumulated wealth, there will be a growing interest in sound decumulation practices — a complex investment challenge and the subject of a recent research project we conducted.
A decumulation strategy must support regular withdrawals from a portfolio regardless of the performance of the underlying investments. Unless the strategy generates a sufficient return, withdrawals will eventually erode the capital below a desired amount or completely (longevity risk). Even if the return is equal to the withdrawal rate, erosion could occur, as the return replacement process is affected by path dependency (or sequencing risk), which is in turn determined by the interaction between the withdrawals and specific characteristics of the strategy’s realized return (which we will refer to collectively as the portfolio distribution).
Figure 1 illustrates the role of withdrawals in the decumulation challenge. The orange line shows a US$1 million hypothetical portfolio that generates a -10% return and then experiences a withdrawal of 4% of the initial portfolio value (US$40,000). The portfolio would then need to generate a return of more than 16% to get back to the US$1 million starting point, compared to an 11% return for a portfolio with no withdrawals. For comparison, we included an accumulation portfolio (light blue line), in which capital is contributed periodically and portfolio drawdowns are more limited.
Next, we considered how the distribution of returns creates the path-dependency effect. We started with two hypothetical US$1 million portfolios and then assumed withdrawals of 4% of the initial portfolio value (US$40,000) annually, spread over equal amounts on a monthly basis. We assumed that Portfolio A returned exactly 5% (annualized) every month while Portfolio B had a distribution of returns centered around 5% (annualized). While the expected returns were the same, Portfolio A had a 100% probability of capital preservation over 30 years and Portfolio B had only a 71% probability. This is entirely due to path dependency, which is a function of the portfolio distribution.
Figure 2 examines the impact of the portfolio distribution in more detail, showing that even if the withdrawal amount and return target are equal (highlighted in orange), there is only about a 50% chance of preserving capital through time. Why? The actual return is in a range due to the distribution, so 50% of the time, withdrawals will not be matched by an equivalent (or higher) return. To improve these odds, investors need to improve the distribution.
The key variables in a decumulation strategy, as we’ve established, are the level of withdrawals and the realized returns of the strategy. Lower withdrawal rates will, all else equal, lessen the erosion and reduce the longevity risk. But this option may not be feasible, depending on the needs of the decumulation investor. With this in mind, we opted to focus on how the realized returns, a function of the portfolio distribution, can be modified to improve the outcome of decumulation strategies. Specifically, we looked at how five characteristics of the portfolio distribution can impact the success of a decumulation strategy: returns, volatility, skewness, peakedness, and the left tail of the returns. Among our key findings:
We share more of our analysis in our paper, Demystifying decumulation: A practical guide. We also suggest practical methods for improving the likelihood of success in decumulation strategies, focusing on portfolio construction, process design, and implementation. These insights may be of use to investors constructing their own decumulation strategies or those evaluating third-party strategies.
Is your asset allocation ready for the realities of climate change?Continue reading
Putting the global economy to the testContinue reading
Is your asset allocation ready for the realities of climate change?
Our Investment Strategy Team shares key findings from the research behind their climate-aware strategic asset allocation (SAA) approach, including challenges and trade-offs that asset owners should understand.
The alpha equation: Balancing active risk sources in multi-asset portfolios
Members of our iStrat Team share their research on the process of deciding how much active risk to take at the asset class and security levels in pursuit of alpha objectives. They also offer a step-by-step framework for implementing the research findings.
Putting the global economy to the test
With economic and market fault lines emerging as a result of higher interest rates, members of our Investment Strategy team reassess the investment landscape and offer their views on equities, fixed income, and commodities.