- Head of Multi-Asset Strategy
- About Us
- My Account
The views expressed are those of the authors at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
While many asset owners recognize the value of a long-term mindset, few realize how critical it is to enduring success in active management. Our research shows that the best active managers suffer extended periods of underperformance along the way to top-quartile and even top-decile results. For asset owners, it can be challenging to resist short-term instincts in volatile environments like the one we’ve seen in recent months. But those who have a strategy to help them stay focused on the long term may be best positioned to reap the benefits of outperformance and avoid potentially costly behaviors, including abandoning a thoughtfully selected allocation to a manager after a relatively short period of underperformance.
Recently, we used the eVestment database to look at the performance of active managers in the global core equity universe who had at least a trailing 10-year history (339 managers, 2013 – 2022). We evaluated their peer-universe-relative 10-year excess return rank (calculated using the MSCI All-Country World Index) to identify the best performers — those in the top quartile or top decile over the full decade.
As shown in the dark-blue bars in Figure 1, every one of these top-quartile managers experienced not just a “bad year,” but a 24-month period during which they lagged the median manager in the universe. Almost all (86%) did the same over a rolling three-year period and more than half (52%) were below median over a rolling five-year period — half of the time period we studied!
We also looked at how much of the time these top-quartile managers spent among the bottom-quartile of their peers (light-blue bars). Amazingly, 89% of the top-quartile managers spent at least a year in the bottom quartile, and more than half were in the bottom quartile over some three-year period. In some cases, three years of bottom-quartile performance is enough to get a manager put on a watch list and fired, even though that’s probably not what you want to do with a manager that will end up in the top quartile.
Remarkably, the same pattern holds for top-decile managers, the “cream of the crop” in the same global core equity universe. Each top-decile manager was below median over at least one two-year period (Figure 2). Nearly three quarters (73%) were below median over a three-year period and close to half (45%) over some five-year period.
Nor were the top-decile managers immune from spending time in the bottom-quartile “dog house.” Many spent a year or two there (85% and 73%, respectively). More than half (52%) spent three years in the bottom quartile and nearly a quarter (24%) spent half of the decade in the bottom quartile, even though they finished in the top tier.
Importantly, we ran the same analysis for all active global core equity managers present in the market during an earlier 10-year time period (2006 – 2015) and found very similar results — suggesting that the near-term underperformance of highly skilled managers is likely a persistent phenomenon and not, say, a unique aspect of the COVID era.
Asset owners (and sometimes their boards) invest enormous time and effort in selecting managers. We think the data above shows that those who believe they have found a winning manager should think twice before abandoning their conviction just because a manager has a bad run — even, potentially, an extended bad run. The art of long-term manager assessment is a bigger topic than we can cover here, but we believe asset owners should look for managers who approach periods of underperformance by balancing conviction in their core philosophy and process with a degree of humility and an openness to testing or revisiting their assumptions and beliefs. Of course, the more managers can help asset owners understand (ahead of time) the kinds of environments in which they will struggle, the better off both parties will be.
For more on this topic, including strategies to help cultivate a long-term mindset, read our recent paper here.
Role, risk, and residual alpha: A framework for manager researchContinue reading
Mid-year Investment OutlookContinue reading
When the US sneezes, does the world still catch a cold?Continue reading
EM equities: Can they prove the doubters wrong?Continue reading
How do bond investors approach the new volatile regime?Continue reading
4 reasons why European investors may benefit from going globalContinue reading
The allocator’s perspective: three key decisions on EM equitiesContinue reading
Role, risk, and residual alpha: A framework for manager research
With many asset owners revisiting their strategic asset allocation and considering changes in their investment line-up, Director of Manager Research Kat Price and Head of Multi-Asset Strategy Adam Berger offer their views on manager selection best practices.
Mid-year Investment Outlook
Explore our latest views on risks and opportunities across the global capital markets as we look ahead to the second half of 2023.
When the US sneezes, does the world still catch a cold?
Macro Strategist John Butler discusses the growing potential for cyclical and monetary policy divergence, despite markets pricing for the contrary, and assesses what it means for investors.
EM equities: Can they prove the doubters wrong?
Multi-Asset Strategist Adam Berger offers six reasons that EM equity performance could be much more compelling in the decade ahead, from attractive valuations to economic tailwinds to mean reversion in the US dollar.
How do bond investors approach the new volatile regime?
Wellington fixed income experts provide an analysis on how to navigate short-term volatility and reposition portfolios for the structural changes occurring in fixed income markets. Watch the replay here.
4 reasons why European investors may benefit from going global
Bonds are looking increasingly attractive, but a new, more volatile, normal means investors with a home bias may wish to revisit portfolios. An inconsistent policy landscape and lower hedging costs are just some of the reasons why European investors in particular may benefit from going global.
The allocator’s perspective: three key decisions on EM equities
How can investors best access opportunities within an improving outlook for emerging market equities? Natasha Brook-Walters, co-head of iStrat, shares three key decision points for allocators.
European credit: seeking to make the most of the new market regime
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Derek Hynes and Investment Specialist Jillian Rooney assess why the new market regime is creating potentially compelling opportunities in the European credit market.
Annual message from our CEO: Forward thinking
After a year of profound economic and market change, CEO Jean Hynes discusses the path forward, including the role of alternatives and sustainability, the firm's investments in talent, and the importance of stability and innovation.
Harnessing the power of engagement in stewardship investing
Equity Portfolio Manager Yolanda Courtines explores why company engagement is a key component of successful stewardship investing.
Have we reached the end of a tech era?
Thematic Strategist Trevor Noren explores how active management and a global lens could provide tech investors with essential edges moving forward.