- Fixed Income Analyst
- Funds
- Capabilities
- Insights
- Sustainability
- About Us
- My Account
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
As widely expected, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) raised the target federal funds rate by 25 basis points (bps), to a range of 4.50% to 4.75%, at its February meeting. The FOMC made no changes to its plans regarding the ongoing reduction of its balance sheet, which began in June 2022.
In the FOMC’s statement, the Committee noted that inflation “has eased somewhat but remains elevated” and echoed its previous assessment that “ongoing increases” to the target rate will likely be appropriate.
During the post-meeting press conference, US Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Jerome Powell enthusiastically noted that disinflation has begun without moderation in labor market strength. He expressed optimism that disinflation may continue without a material increase in unemployment or a substantial slowing in growth. Chair Powell dismissed concerns about divergence between the Committee’s forecasts for interest rates and futures market pricing, suggesting that the difference was due to alternative outlooks on the pace of disinflation. He also allowed for the possibility of decreases in the target range this year should inflation fall more quickly than the Committee thinks it will.
The US bond market interpreted Chair Powell’s remarks as quite dovish, pushing yields on short-dated Treasury securities lower.
The minutes of the December 2022 FOMC meeting suggested that the Committee was worried about loosening financial conditions, noting “an unwarranted easing in financial conditions, especially if driven by a misperception by the public of the Committee’s reaction function, would complicate the Committee’s effort to restore price stability.” By many metrics, financial conditions have indeed eased since December, and the decline in interest rates following the Fed’s press conference yesterday will likely contribute to further easing of financial conditions. However, Chair Powell essentially dismissed questions about such easing, instead focusing on the longer-term tightening of conditions over the last year. The question for markets, then, is whether easing is “warranted” given the actual data.
Since December, both inflation and wages have moderated and may continue to do so amid recent slowing in real growth indicators. The December CPI and core CPI prints were 6.5% and 5.7%, respectively. Both manufacturing and services ISM data have been below expectations. Additionally, consumer spending and retail sales have cooled. And importantly, average hourly earnings in December dipped to 4.6%, from 5.0%. Temporary employment, which is a useful leading indicator of labor market strength, has also declined.
Despite the slowing, we still see signs that the US economy could surprise to the upside, and should growth prove more robust than anticipated, the Fed may need to increase interest rates more than is currently priced into the futures market. Initial jobless claims have been below expectations every print since December’s FOMC meeting, while the unemployment rate has declined from 3.7% to 3.5%. Some growth numbers have also been better than expected, including fourth-quarter GDP (2.9%). Data related to the housing market and indicators of consumer sentiment have generally printed above consensus as well. Finally, the reopening of China’s economy appears to be proceeding apace, which may put upward pressure on global inflation and growth.
The FOMC is reinvesting Treasury and mortgage-backed securities (MBS) up to caps of $60 billion and $35 billion, respectively. There has been speculation that balance-sheet reduction may end earlier than previously anticipated due to declining bank reserves, which are important operationally to the Fed’s implementation of quantitative tightening. As of January 26, reserve balances with Fed banks were around $3 trillion, down from a peak of nearly $4.2 trillion in the third quarter of 2021. Likewise, take-up at the Fed’s overnight reverse repurchase facility has increased to over $2 trillion, after being used very little prior to the second quarter of 2021.
Chair Powell gave no indication yesterday that the Fed is concerned about reserve scarcity, leading me to believe the FOMC is unlikely to alter balance-sheet normalization in the near-term. This is particularly true with MBS running off the Fed’s balance sheet at a pace of about $20 billion a month since September 2022, well below the maximum implied by reinvestment caps. This may mean balance-sheet reduction has put less downward pressure on home prices and shelter costs than previously thought.
The ongoing normalization of the Fed’s balance sheet, which swelled during the height of the COVID crisis, is likely to progress as planned in the coming months, and the FOMC will probably continue hiking interest rates until it sees sustained evidence of disinflation, including decelerating inflation in the services sector. Although slowing inflation, labor market strength, and better-than-expected growth impulses are welcome, we believe it is possible that the market narrative has moved ahead of the actual data with regard to the hoped-for “soft landing” economic scenario. By its own admission, the FOMC still has some work to do to go to get inflation back down to the Fed’ target range — and if history is any guide, that’s going to be tough to pull off without tipping the US economy into some form of recession.
Expert
URL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
Have you looked at Brazilian equities lately?
Equity Research Analyst David Reid believes now is an opportune time for EM equity investors to consider implementing or augmenting portfolio allocations to Brazilian stocks.
4 reasons why European investors may benefit from going global
Bonds are looking increasingly attractive, but a new, more volatile, normal means investors with a home bias may wish to revisit portfolios. An inconsistent policy landscape and lower hedging costs are just some of the reasons why European investors in particular may benefit from going global.
Did the Fed just make a policy error?
Did the Fed just make a policy error? All things considered, Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Jeremy Forster thinks the answer is yes. Learn why and what the implications could be.
Is the long-awaited change in Japan’s fortunes finally materialising?
Portfolio Manager Dan Maguire explores why Japan may finally be exiting deflation and assesses the opportunities this structural change could create for small- and mid-cap equities.
Three macro assumptions that could be just plain wrong
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Brij Khurana offers his non-consensus take on three entrenched, but potentially flawed, beliefs in today's market environment.
Putting the global economy to the test
With economic and market fault lines emerging as a result of higher interest rates, members of our Investment Strategy team reassess the investment landscape and offer their views on equities, fixed income, and commodities.
High-yield bonds: Too early to get aggressive?
Our high-yield team suggests a somewhat defensive risk posture for now but expects opportunities to take on greater risk to arise later this year.
Macro risks to watch in this rapidly oscillating global cycle
Macro Strategist John Butler explores the two key questions he believes macro investors should focus on in the current volatile environment.
Financial stability versus inflation: The Fed’s balancing act has gotten much trickier
The Fed’s policy calculus has clearly changed somewhat over the past few weeks but the central bank may not be done hiking rates just yet, says Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Jeremy Forster.
Securitized assets: Caught in the storm but with scattered bright spots
Securitized assets have been on the front lines of the ongoing turmoil in the banking sector, but not all securitized subsectors appear equally vulnerable.
On to the next crisis: Glimpsing a post-SVB world
Amid the turmoil in the US banking sector, Global Investment Strategist Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson suggests investors consider pivoting to a “risk-management mode” that favors higher-quality assets. (Published 14 March 2023)
URL References
Related Insights