US-China frictions: Reading between the headlines

We highlight the escalating conflict between the US and China and discuss potential investment implications.

Views expressed are those of the authors and are subject to change. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional or institutional investors only.

Relations between the United States and China have further deteriorated since the beginning of May. Although the structural, multiyear conflict had briefly paused when both countries signed a “phase one” trade agreement in January, tensions escalated again recently with a number of significant actions from both sides (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

Tracking the conflict

We believe these events indicate an unsurprising reacceleration of this conflict. Evidence can also be seen in the rising tensions in the South China Sea, as well as in the recent military conflict between China and India, a US ally. In the near term, US-China relations are likely to remain under particular stress as November’s US presidential election approaches and the COVID-19 pandemic continues.

The potential impact of US legislation

“The Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act” is one of roughly 270 proposals in the US Congress targeting China, many of which touch on capital markets and investing. The proposed law would bar any foreign company from listing on US securities exchanges if it has failed to pass the US Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s (PCAOB’s) audits for three straight years. This development is neither unprecedented nor unexpected as the inconsistencies between the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)/PCAOB rules and Chinese national security legislation have long been discussed.

The bill, which was approved in the US Senate, will now need to be passed in the House of Representatives and be signed by the president in order to become law. In its current form, the law would not cause Chinese companies in the US to be delisted automatically. Instead, as noted, companies would need to fail three consecutive years of audits and be deemed subject to removal by the SEC.

If the law is passed as written, we think its direct and immediate impact on equity markets may be limited. After all, the bill’s design offers years for Chinese companies to adapt to the new US standard. And even if Chinese ADRs were to ultimately delist, Chinese domestic capital markets are supported by deep local savings pools. Importantly, this proposed law would also not stop existing US investors from trading ADR ownership for locally listed ownership, as it does not prevent US-based investors from purchasing the equity of Chinese businesses listed in Asia.

In addition, a comparison of two major Chinese conglomerates — one with a US listing and one without — shows that the firm with an ADR listing does not receive a valuation premium for its access to US capital markets. This could indicate that at least large companies may be able move away from ADR listings through new listings on exchanges such as Shanghai or Hong Kong without harming their market capitalizations. However, the law may prove challenging for smaller Chinese companies that are only listed in the United States.

New Hong Kong security laws

Notably, the US was not alone in announcing new legislation. China opened its annual National People’s Congress meeting in May by revealing new laws that seek to prevent, stop, and punish secession, subversion, foreign interference, and terrorism in Hong Kong. The decision sidestepped Hong Kong’s legislature and has called into question the “one country, two systems” model which has been in place since Hong Kong was turned over by the British. In response, President Trump announced that the US would terminate Hong Kong’s special trading status — which would allow the possibility of US sanctions. Since the law took effect at the end of June, the US has enacted several policies that further distance the two countries and prompted tit-for-tat responses from Beijing.

Looking ahead

While the US-China conflict has been shaped by the Trump administration’s policy, increasingly negative perceptions of China in the US have yielded bipartisan support for tough policies (Figure 2). We therefore believe tensions are unlikely to end regardless of the outcome of November’s US presidential election. In fact, we think the conflict will continue to escalate as rhetoric accelerates approaching the election. However, we are also mindful of the deep economic and financial ties that continue to bind the world’s two largest economies together. Within the confines of economically rational decision making, we think these ties will draw boundaries around negotiations.

FIGURE 2

Negative views of China continue to grow in US

We find it helpful to consider US-Russia relations as an example of where we may ultimately see the limits of this conflict. In 2018, various Russian sanction proposals were put forward, but most were not implemented. This was, in part, due to their inevitable impact on other economies and financial markets. For instance, we think the US Treasury Department understood that forced sales of foreign-owned Russian assets would negatively impact US institutions and individuals, as well as our allies.

Finally, we know from experience that disruption creates winners and losers. Select companies in and around China continue to benefit from a multiyear import substitution trend, driven by the trade dispute. In addition, the COVID-19 crisis is likely to further accelerate the evolution of global supply chains. While this may eventually harm some Chinese exporters, such as health care equipment manufacturers, at the same time, we expect many consumer and technology companies to see increased demand as Chinese buyers shift to shopping locally.

As US-China tensions intensify amid COVID-19, the US election, and many legislative proposals, we’ll continue to offer our latest insights on how the evolving conflict could impact global investment markets.

Please see the important disclosure page for more information.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

2021 Investment Outlook
As we head into the new year, thought leaders from across our investment platform share their views on pressing questions.
December 2020
2021 Investment Outlook
,
The post-COVID economy: A productivity booster shot
Macro Strategist Juhi Dhawan thinks US growth will benefit from a revival in labor productivity in coming years, aided by a digital revolution that's getting a boost from recent technology investments across many areas of the economy.
December 2020
The post-COVID economy: A productivity booster shot
,
2021 Global Economic Outlook
Our 2021 economic outlook describes the forces we believe will shape macro & market events, including significant geopolitical risks with strong 2021 growth likely.
November 2020
2021 Global Economic Outlook
,
Arancha Cano: Alternatives manager profile
London-based Equity Portfolio Manager Arancha Cano shares her views on alternatives investing and explores key lessons learned over her career investing in long/short financials.
November 2020
Arancha Cano: Alternatives manager profile
,
Waiting to exhale: Election suspense and uncertainty
Macro Strategist Michael Medeiros, Global Investment Strategist Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson, and Geopolitical Strategist Thomas Mucha share their latest thoughts on one of the most pivotal, hotly contested elections in US history.
November 2020
Waiting to exhale: Election suspense and uncertainty
,
EMs: With great challenges come great opportunities
From health and wellness to climate change and more, the COVID-19 crisis has spawned or accelerated compelling investable themes across a range of EM countries. Against that backdrop, four of Wellington’s EM equity portfolio managers share their latest insights.
October 2020
EMs: With great challenges come great opportunities
,
Tracking the green transition in emerging markets
COVID-19 has ratcheted up environmental debates across emerging markets and highlighted the intersection of those concerns with local supply chains and infrastructure gaps. Equity Portfolio Manager Liliana Castillo Dearth looks at China as a case study.
October 2020
Tracking the green transition in emerging markets
,
<span>Top of Mind</span> Time for a new playbook on inflation and active management?
Are fiscal and monetary policy setting us on a course for inflation? How has the COVID-19 crisis altered the backdrop for active management? Multi-Asset Strategist Adam Berger offers his take, as well as thoughts on real assets, value stocks, the technology sector, and alternative investments.
October 2020
Top of Mind Time for a new playbook on inflation and active management?
,

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To accept cookies click Accept & Close, or continue browsing as normal. For more information, visit Cookies & Tracking NoticE.