Archived insights remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older insights.
publish

Are we on the cusp of an unconstrained bond fund “renaissance”?

Portfolio Managers Brian Garvey and Brij Khurana and Investment Director Brian Doherty see unconstrained fixed income approaches, if properly implemented, as being well suited to the current (or any) market environment.

The views expressed are those of the authors at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.

KEY POINTS

  • We believe capital allocators should brace for an environment of greater fixed income supply, declining savings rates, and more frequent bouts of market volatility in the period ahead.
  • “One size” will likely no longer fit all — a combination of both total-return- and absolute return-oriented bond strategies may be necessary to optimize the fixed income risk/reward trade-off.
  • An unconstrained bond approach, if properly implemented, can function as both an effective portfolio diversifier and a total-return enhancer across different market environments.

The unconstrained bond universe is in dire need of an image makeover. Originally envisioned as “go-anywhere,” benchmark-agnostic investment strategies, unconstrained bond funds rose to prominence between the years 2012 and 2016. During that time, many capital allocators were forecasting low forward-looking returns for US fixed income and, as such, wanted to diversify away from traditional core portfolios whose performance was tied to the Barclays US Aggregate Index (the “Agg”). Many asset managers created two types of unconstrained bond funds to meet this increased demand for non-traditional fixed income.

The first type was total-return-focused funds. However, most managers recognized that their clients were looking for these strategies to exhibit low beta (correlation) to the Agg for diversification purposes. As a result, many of the total-return strategies that were launched in the 2010s carried a significant degree of credit risk, along with low levels of duration. These strategies held up well through the “taper tantrum” of 2013, only to then perform poorly when credit spreads rose sharply in 2015 and early 2016. Having little to no duration and large amounts of credit risk caused the funds to perform roughly in line with their high-yield counterparts, rather than acting as the “anchor to windward” that most investors expect from fixed income.

The second type of unconstrained bond fund was focused on absolute return fixed income investing. Most of these strategies sought to achieve positive returns in all market settings and to have minimal beta or correlation to traditional bond market risk factors like duration and credit. Accordingly, many of them managed to perform well in “risk-off” environments like that of early 2016. However, without much in the way of market beta, many of these strategies simply did not generate sufficient returns to meet their clients’ needs and missed out on some banner years for fixed income. For example, 2014, 2019, and 2020 all saw strong fixed income market performance.

In response to their frustration with unconstrained bond funds, many clients began to employ a “barbell” strategy — allocating to both higher-yielding income funds and benchmark-relative core bond portfolios. Because income funds by definition need to offer an attractive current yield, these strategies typically featured high levels of both duration and credit. Therefore, many of them fared better in risk-off environments than unconstrained funds and benefited from yield compression when it occurred. At the same time, many allocators also wanted the equity diversification that bonds provide and, to that end, maintained…

To read more, please click the download link below.

Recommended for you

Impact investing in practice: supporting the shift to alternative energy
In this case study, we explore how our impact team supports the shift to alternative energy while seeking to capture the associated return potential.
Archived insights remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older insights.
publish
January 2022
Impact investing in practice: supporting the shift to alternative energy
,
publish
2022 Investment Outlook
As you look ahead to 2022, we invite you to explore investable ideas and trends across all major asset classes curated from our marketplace of ideas — more than 900 investors strong.
Archived insights remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older insights.
publish
December 2021
2022 Investment Outlook
,
publish
2022 Fixed Income Outlook
Our fixed income outlook for 2022, examines our views on inflation and interest rates and the role central banks will play in the coming year.
Archived insights remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older insights.
publish
December 2021
2022 Fixed Income Outlook
,
publish
LDI Alert —<span><br>Time to buy credit or Treasuries? Ideas on calibrating the trade-off </span>
After hitting derisking triggers in 2021, many plans are looking ahead to the next trigger and thinking about how expensive the investment-grade credit market is currently. LDI Team members Connor Fitzgerald and Bill Cole offer metrics to aid the decision-making process and consider potential alternatives.
Archived insights remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older insights.
publish
November 2021
LDI Alert —
Time to buy credit or Treasuries? Ideas on calibrating the trade-off
,
publish
A credit strategy designed for all seasons
Today’s fixed income allocators face a variety of challenges. Against this backdrop, Multi-Asset Strategist Cara Lafond and Investment Directors Amar Reganti, Chris Perret, and Andrew Bayerl make the case for having an “all-weather” credit portfolio composed of carefully chosen building blocks.
Archived insights remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older insights.
publish
November 2021
A credit strategy designed for all seasons
,
publish
Countering climate risks through collaboration
Global Industry Analyst Alan Hsu and Dr. Philip Duffy of Woodwell Climate Research Center discuss the importance of close cooperation between investors and climate scientists when addressing climate action.
Archived insights remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older insights.
publish
October 2021
Countering climate risks through collaboration
,
publish
Does the credit market still have something to offer long/short investors?
While there may be concerns about the beta potential in credit markets, Multi-Asset Strategist Cara Lafond offers three reasons to stay focused on the attractive alpha opportunities that long/short credit strategies may pursue.
Archived insights remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older insights.
publish
October 2021
Does the credit market still have something to offer long/short investors?
,
publish
The evolution of derisking:  Assessing new and time-tested  liability-hedging ideas
As defined benefit plans contemplate the best path to their eventual "end state," members of our LDI team update their liability-hedging research with a blend of traditional benchmark ideas and new opportunities to capitalize on changing market conditions and a broader investment universe.
Archived insights remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older insights.
publish
October 2021
The evolution of derisking: Assessing new and time-tested liability-hedging ideas
,
publish
Louis Liu
 PhD, CFA, ASA, MAAA