composite-notebook-tower-people-465360343
Global ESG Research Update

Update on stewardship priorities

Multiple authors
2022-10-31
Archived info
Archived pieces remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older pieces.

The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.

In the first quarter of 2021, we highlighted diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and climate change among our stewardship priorities for the year. We believe these issues can affect long-term investment outcomes, and we seek to align our proxy voting decisions with our engagement efforts to encourage improvement. We wrote letters to all S&P 500 companies, communicating our updated voting approach, continuing our longstanding practice of engaging on these issues. We voted against the reelection of nominating/governance committee chairs at 28 companies in the index that failed to disclose the racial and ethnic composition of their boards. We believe board diversity helps companies make better strategic decisions. We were not alone in using our vote to encourage improvement: Reelection rates during the 2021 voting season for directors at these companies averaged 85%, lower than the typical 95%. In 2022, we plan to repeat this voting pattern for the S&P 500 and may expand our approach to other indices.

Climate change continues to be a priority of our voting and engagement efforts because of the significant long-term financial risks we believe it poses for economies, markets, and therefore, our clients’ investment portfolios. In 2021, we supported several shareholder proposals asking companies to take specific steps to align with the Paris Agreement and improve climate-risk reporting. We generally support proposals requesting board oversight of a company’s political contributions and lobbying activities or those seeking improved disclosures, particularly where material inconsistencies in reporting and strategy may exist with respect to climate plans. In assessing shareholder proposals related to lobbying, we also focus on the transparency of existing disclosures.

New for the 2021 voting season were proposals from management and shareholders alike seeking shareholder approval of climate transition plans (“Say on Climate”). While the proposals varied in quality due to the absence of market standards, we assessed each plan on its merits, applying our knowledge of companies held in portfolios we manage on our clients’ behalf as well as our climate transition-risk research capabilities.

Finally, we advocated for best practices with regulators. To the US Securities and Exchange Commission, we communicated our support for mandatory disclosure of material climate risks, including an…

To read more, please click the download link below.

Authored by
san-martin-carolina-316x316.jpg
Carolina San Martin, CFA
Director of ESG Research
Boston
barbieri-jeffrey-316x316
Jeff Barbieri
ESG Research Analyst
Boston
blitstein-lindsay-316x316.jpg
Lindsay Blitstein, CFA
ESG Analyst
Boston
white-lauren-316x316
Lauren White
Business Associate
Boston

Our approach to sustainable investing

Recommended for you