Archived insights remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older insights.
publish

New derivatives regulations: Adapting to rule 18f-4

We explore the impact of new SEC derivatives rule 18f-4 and highlight how we can help our clients adapt to the new requirements.

The views expressed are those of the authors at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional or institutional investors only.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted a wholesale revision of US mutual fund derivatives regulations in the form of new rule 18f-4. This rule replaces the existing regulatory regime, which was based on asset segregation, with new fund-level risk-management obligations for funds. Unfortunately, the rule is not entirely clear on how these obligations are to be met by funds and advisers who engage subadvisers — and especially by funds managed by multiple subadvisers.

In response to the change, we assembled a cross-functional team to analyze the rule and determine how we can help our clients adapt to these new regulations, which go into effect in August 2022.

In this paper, we share a snapshot of where we are in the process and outline what services we plan to offer our clients to help them meet these new obligations and comply with rule 18f-4’s provisions. 

What does rule 18f-4 require?

The new regulations increase risk-management requirements for funds that invest in derivatives, with differing obligations for “limited derivatives users” and those funds with higher derivatives use.

Funds that invest in derivatives on a limited basis are only required to generally assess their derivatives risk. These funds may not invest in derivatives in excess of 10% of their assets on a notional basis, subject to some adjustments for certain hedging transactions.

The more significant obligations are for those funds with higher derivatives use. These funds are required to establish a derivatives risk-management program that includes seven primary elements:

  • Appointing a derivatives risk manager (DRM)
  • Complying with a 200% relative value-at-risk (VaR) or a 20% absolute VaR requirement
  • Backtesting the VaR formula used for the VaR test
  • Identifying and assessing their derivatives risks
  • Establishing derivatives risk guidelines
  • Stress testing the fund’s portfolio
  • Reporting and escalating any derivatives risks and VaR exceedances

In addition to the above, rule 18f-4 requires funds to both maintain associated records and make certain new reports to the SEC. In our view, funds and advisers must now consider how best to comply with these provisions.

Working together

Although new rule 18f-4 places these new obligations on funds and their appointed DRMs, it also provides flexibility for funds and their DRMs to delegate functions to other parties, including subadvisers. As an investment subadviser, we believe that we are well positioned to perform the investment-related functions under the rule. In addition, there are other areas where…

To read more, please click the download link below.

Recommended for you

Chinese government bonds: How do they measure up in a multi-asset framework?
As China's bond market continues to grow in size and liquidity, we consider the potential role the country's government bonds can play in diversifying a broader sovereign portfolio, improving yields, and offsetting equity risk.
Archived insights remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older insights.
publish
August 2021
Chinese government bonds: How do they measure up in a multi-asset framework?
,
publish
Update on key sustainability initiatives
We highlight progress on key sustainability initiatives: interim targets for our net-zero commitment, inclusion of location data in climate disclosures, and expanding our compliance with SFDR.
Archived insights remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older insights.
publish
August 2021
Update on key sustainability initiatives
,
publish
Why global insurers should take a closer look at REITs
Insurance Strategist Max Davies, Investment Director Will Lee, and Investment Specialist Ethan Sales look at the potential benefits of REITs for global insurers, plus why now may be an opportune time to consider this often unsung asset class.
Archived insights remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older insights.
publish
August 2021
Why global insurers should take a closer look at REITs
,
publish
Rethinking growth and where long/short directional strategies fit in
With allocators looking for opportunities to recalibrate their growth exposures, Multi-Asset Strategist Cara Lafond shares her “best fit” criteria for long/short directional strategies and explains why the financial sector appears to check all the boxes.
Archived insights remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older insights.
publish
July 2021
Rethinking growth and where long/short directional strategies fit in
,
publish
Are we on the cusp of an  unconstrained bond fund “renaissance”?
Portfolio Managers Brian Garvey and Brij Khurana and Investment Director Brian Doherty see unconstrained fixed income approaches, if properly implemented, as being well suited to the current (or any) market environment.
Archived insights remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older insights.
publish
July 2021
Are we on the cusp of an unconstrained bond fund “renaissance”?
,
publish
Investing implications of a three-speed economy
Multi-Asset Strategist and Portfolio Manager Nick Samouilhan and Investment Directors Andrew Sharp-Paul and Matthew Bullock highlight how key regional differences globally have led to three distinct ”blocks” of the world economy.
Archived insights remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older insights.
publish
July 2021
Investing implications of a three-speed economy
,
publish
<span>Insurance Multi-Asset Outlook — </span>The rising tide of inflation: Risks and opportunities for insurers
COVID vaccination progress and ample policy support may warrant a more pro-risk investment stance going forward, but persistent inflation concerns continue to loom. Multi-Asset Insurance Strategist Tim Antonelli and Investment Strategy Analyst Daniel Cook share insights to help insurers navigate these competing forces.
Archived insights remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older insights.
publish
July 2021
Insurance Multi-Asset Outlook — The rising tide of inflation: Risks and opportunities for insurers
,
publish
Tim Antonelli
 CFA, FRM, SCR
Split decision: Should investors  separate China from EM equities?
Many investors are contemplating whether to separate China from the rest of their emerging market equity allocation. Members of our Investment Strategy Group argue that the key decision point is not China’s dominance of the emerging market index, but the extent to which a standalone China allocation can be viewed as similar to an EM ex-China allocation. In this paper, they evaluate the similarity of the two allocations using a variety of metrics, from correlations to factors to sector composition.
Archived insights remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older insights.
publish
July 2021
Split decision: Should investors separate China from EM equities?
,
publish
Nick Samouilhan
 PhD, CFA, FRM