- Director of Climate Research
- About Us
- My Account
The views expressed are those of the authors at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
Earth’s diverse, abundant ecosystems have long been a source of “natural capital” for economic growth and development. Today, scientists broadly agree that human activity is rapidly degrading ecosystems and causing biodiversity loss that may have grave consequences for human health, economic stability, and financial asset values. Given scientific consensus, our Climate Research Team and broader Sustainable Investment (SI) Team believe that the investment community needs to understand the potential impacts of biodiversity loss and explore ways to mitigate the associated financial risks.
To this end, we are deepening our research on biodiversity, with the long-term objective of helping our investors better assess the financial materiality of biodiversity loss on regions, asset classes, and sectors. Our team is also evolving our stewardship practices with a view to identifying the areas where we believe we can add the greatest value for our clients.
One of the key challenges with understanding biodiversity is its exceptional complexity and range. The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) defines biodiversity as “the variability among living organisms from all sources including terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are a part.”1 This variability not only covers differences in attributes, but also “changes in abundance and distribution over time and space within and among species, biological communities and ecosystems.”
The factors that cause biodiversity loss are myriad, but, according to IPBES,2 the direct drivers can be grouped under:
The resulting impacts of biodiversity loss are wide-ranging. They include environmental degradation and destruction of critical ecosystems, risks to human health, damage to social fabric and the potential for conflict, and economic losses over the long term.
As carbon emissions accumulate, research indicates that a growing number of species will be exposed to potentially dangerous climate conditions, which may threaten their long-term viability. Our team believes that biodiversity research is the next logical step in understanding and addressing climate-related risks. Many natural resources, including soil, permafrost, and forests, are major carbon sinks. Healthy above-ground and below-ground ecosystems, including coral reefs, mangrove forests, and many others, can help mitigate the adverse impact of a changing climate.
There is no single metric to capture the extent of biodiversity loss, but scientists observe growing evidence of rapid acceleration. According to the WWF’s Living Planet Report 2022, global wildlife populations have plummeted by 69% on average since 1970, 3 while a 2019 IPBES report found that one million species face extinction, which, for many, could be within decades.4
Healthy ecosystems are vital to the long-term viability of our economy and society. In our view, natural capital can no longer be considered as a cost-free input into business processes, but rather as an asset that needs to be preserved and accounted for. Capturing the full extent of the potential economic impact of biodiversity loss is challenging, however. Data is currently unreliable and inconsistent, companies and governments both benefit from biodiversity and contribute to its loss, and industrial production supply chains contain hidden dependencies and have extensive impacts on biodiversity.
Estimates from the World Economic Forum (WEF) give an idea of what is at stake. WEF calculations suggest that approximately US$44 trillion of economic value generation — more than half of the world’s total GDP — is moderately or highly dependent on nature, with the three sectors that it considers the most dependent on nature (construction, agriculture, and food and beverages) generating close to US$8 trillion of gross value added, roughly twice the size of the German economy. 5
We are already witnessing significant economic damage from biodiversity loss. In its 2019 assessment, IPBES found reduced productivity in 23% of the global terrestrial area and up to US$577 billion of annual global crop output at risk due to pollinator loss. The IPBES assessment also paints a bleak picture of marine biodiversity loss as various forms of pollution have produced more than 400 ocean “dead zones,” totaling more than 245,000 km2 — a combined area greater than the United Kingdom.
As a fiduciary of our clients’ assets, our SI Team sees it as our responsibility to better understand biodiversity loss and help assess its financial materiality across asset classes, securities, and geographies. While the asset management industry currently lacks the appropriate datasets and frameworks to fully integrate biodiversity into the investment process, regulators, financial institutions, and other stakeholders are starting to focus on the relevance of nature, which may accelerate data availability.
As with climate change, we expect awareness of biodiversity to eventually permeate capital markets. We see four main stages in the journey toward the integration of biodiversity considerations into investment decisions:
Deepen biodiversity knowledge
While the industry is still in the early stages of translating biodiversity data and risks into standardized metrics, investors can begin by developing their knowledge of biodiversity. A few good information sources include:
Wellington’s SI Team will also share insights as we deepen our knowledge and hone our approach to biodiversity research.
In parallel to knowledge building, we suggest investors start to evolve their stewardship practices through corporate engagements and proxy voting.
Join industry collaborative initiatives
We advocate for participation in industry frameworks and initiatives. These include the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosure (TNFD), CERES, the Platform for Biodiversity Accounting for Financials (PBAF), the Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN), the Investors Policy Dialogue on Deforestation (IPDD), and several others.
Invest in research; explore new ideas
Our research collaborations with Woodwell Climate Research Center and the Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have resulted in a rich dialogue and invaluable insights on the physical and transition risks of climate change. These partnerships are aimed at bridging the gap between climate science and finance. We have begun to explore connections between finance and biodiversity as well.
In our collaboration with Woodwell on the physical risks of climate change, we have found that translating scientific insights into financial terminology can be particularly effective in enabling investment teams to analyze and compare climate-related risks in their models and financial calculus.
As our work with Woodwell expands to biodiversity, we are brainstorming a future research concept that we call the “cost of nature sold” (CONS), a potential analog to cost of goods sold (COGS), a common accounting term broadly familiar to investors. While a significant data vacuum must be closed before CONS could be a reliable metric, it illustrates how we strive to think creatively about potential metrics that might be useful in the investment context. In our view, the more financial market participants and scientists can use common nomenclature, the faster investment decision makers can process and apply relevant information.
Based on scientific consensus, our SI Team has concluded that, as with climate change, biodiversity loss can be a material financial risk to many companies and investors. Unfortunately, the lack of appropriate data and disclosure standards means that the asset management industry has a long journey ahead to integrate biodiversity considerations into investment decisions at scale. At this stage, our team believes investors should focus on building biodiversity knowledge, prioritizing those areas where biodiversity risk is most pronounced, and developing stewardship practices. We aim to help our clients and portfolio companies navigate the rapidly changing market and regulatory backdrop and look forward to sharing our insights on the investment risks of biodiversity loss.
1IPBES glossary; Source: IPBES secretariat. | 2Models of drivers of biodiversity and ecosystem change; Source: IPBES secretariat. | 3Source: WWF (2022). Living Planet Report 2022 - Building a nature-positive society. Almond, R.E.A., Grooten, M., Juffe Bignoli, D. & Petersen, T. (Eds). WWF, Gland, Switzerland. | 4Source: IPBES (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Version 1). | 5WEF New_Nature_Economy_Report_2020 ; Source: World Economic Forum.
Building climate resilience: Toward a practical corporate frameworkContinue reading
Picture this: Our 2023 economic forecast in five chartsContinue reading
Climate mapping in action: Investment case studiesContinue reading
Perspectives on today’s alternative investment environmentContinue reading
Five key ESG topics for private companies in 2023Continue reading
2023 ESG & Sustainability OutlookContinue reading
Focusing on value amid rising global challenges and opportunitiesContinue reading
Building climate resilience: Toward a practical corporate framework
The need for systemic climate change resilience is becoming clear. We present a practical framework to help companies enhance resilience in their own operations.
Picture this: Our 2023 economic forecast in five charts
We explain the shifts the market is undergoing, analyze the implications for different asset classes, and identify potential risks and opportunities in a series of visuals.
Climate mapping in action: Investment case studies
We describe our Climate Exposure Risk Application (CERA), which can help our investment teams visualize and quantify physical climate risks.
Perspectives on today’s alternative investment environment
Take a quick tour of the alternative investment environment with investors from across our macro research and hedge fund teams, as they explore the geopolitical landscape, macro volatility, and key trends like climate-change adaptation and digital tokenization.
Five key ESG topics for private companies in 2023
Our ESG for Private Investments Team explores five critical ESG topics for private companies in the year ahead.
2023 ESG & Sustainability Outlook
Our head of Sustainable Investment shares key areas of focus for 2023, including climate change and biodiversity, modern slavery, data privacy, shareholder rights, and impact investing,
Focusing on value amid rising global challenges and opportunities
Our Sustainable Investing (SI) Research Team offers a high-level view of 2023 research and engagement priorities.
Harnessing the power of engagement in stewardship investing
Equity Portfolio Manager Yolanda Courtines explores why company engagement is a key component of successful stewardship investing.
Advancing stewardship on biodiversity: Engagement examples
Members of our ESG Research Team share their approach to and examples of engagements on the financial risks of biodiversity.
ESG in private markets: Insights for 2023
We highlight five key areas for private companies to prioritize in 2023 and share the essential steps they can take to keep up with today’s evolving ESG risks and opportunities.
Understanding the climate opportunity in alternatives
Portfolio Manager Alan Hsu highlights the potential inefficiencies created by traditional long-only climate strategies.