- Multi-Asset Strategist
Singapore, Institutional
Change
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
Since the turn of the century, equities and bonds have usually maintained a negative correlation. That relationship has now turned positive. The question is, will this last? And if so, how might it alter portfolio risk mitigation?
Putting the positive correlation in perspective
In many multi-asset portfolios, the principal protective relationship is the negative relationship between equities and bonds (duration). Specifically, during times of equity market declines, the expectation is that duration will rally and at least partly offset the loss. However, this year has seen both equities and bonds decline. This positive correlation has turned the equity/bond relationship from risk-mitigating to risk-additive and challenged many multi-asset portfolios.
Perhaps the easiest way to understand why the correlation has turned positive is to think through why it is often negative. Specifically, imagine that the equity market declines due to a deteriorating economic outlook. Markets would, given the experience of recent years, likely expect central banks to cut interest rates to spur demand and get the economy back on track. It is this expectation that has often generated the negative correlation: A worsened economic outlook is negative for equities but positive for duration when the response leads to lower rates.
But this relationship does not work if central banks are also facing inflationary pressure, as they are now. In this case, central banks will be torn between either cutting rates (in response to the worsened economic outlook) or hiking rates (in response to higher inflation). If central banks decide to focus on inflation, as they have so far this year, then bonds will decline along with equities.
Are we more likely to see inflationary shocks and periods of rising inflationary pressures amid a weakening economic outlook than in the past? While it’s hard to make definitive statements, we think so. Many of the dynamics that kept inflation low for years (e.g., globalization) have begun to unwind, making inflation generally higher. As a result, we expect that central banks will be forced to wrestle with a trade-off between growth and inflation that they haven’t seen in decades. If this is correct, then we should expect episodes of positive equity/bond correlation to be more likely going forward.
What can multi-asset investors do about it?
While bonds can still be protective during disinflationary shocks (when policy cuts are likely), there will be times (during inflationary shocks) when they are not. It is therefore about augmenting the protective role of bonds, not replacing it.
In some cases, this may be achieved by adding structural allocations to defensive exposures (e.g., gold, defensive equities, certain types of hedge funds). But we think another potential part of the solution can be to introduce a process we call active risk control (ARC). This process, which can be a complement to a standard active asset allocation process, seeks to actively adjust portfolio hedges as the perceived probability of a market decline fluctuates. For example, if the probability of a near-term drawdown is elevated, various protective strategies (e.g., options, beta hedging, volatility-control mechanisms) may be implemented to potentially help mitigate some of the downside loss even if the correlation between equities and bonds remains positive.
For more on the shifting macro environment and the need for a broader set of investment tools, see our Mid-2022 Investment Outlook.
Expert
Related insights
Showing
of
Insights Posts
URL References
Related Insights
Read next
Showing
of
Insights Posts
2023 Asia Pacific Investment Forum: Restrategise for an altered macro regime
At our 2023 Asia Pacific Investment Forum, a multidisciplinary group of Wellington’s specialists shared their unique perspectives on how to re-strategise for 2023 and beyond.
Video
2024-03-31
Monthly Market Snapshot — February 2023
A monthly update on equity, fixed income, currency, and commodity markets.
Whitepaper
2023-05-15
Wellington investor survey: The bears ponder whether inflation will be too hot, too cold or just right
Conducted prior to the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, our latest quarterly survey of Wellington investors shows a majority of respondents being more bearish than the consensus view.
Quick Take
2024-03-31
Using market-implied regimes to help build more resilient portfolios
Markets may fluctuate between different regimes, but how exactly should those regimes be defined? Our iStrat Team offers research on their market behavior-based approach and explains how it may aid in constructing portfolios that are better able to withstand the ups and downs of different environments.
Article
2024-03-31
Tight money: Banks feeling the squeeze of higher rates
In this curated collection, some of our experts share their latest perspectives on the ongoing turmoil in the US banking sector and its potential implications.
Collection
2024-03-31
On to the next crisis: Glimpsing a post-SVB world
Amid the turmoil in the US banking sector, Global Investment Strategist Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson suggests investors consider pivoting to a “risk-management mode” that favors higher-quality assets. (Published 14 March 2023)
Quick Take
2024-03-31
Understanding the US banking sector shake-up
Investment Communications Managers Jitu Naidu and Adam Norman detail recent US bank failures and analyze the implications. (Published 14 March 2023)
Quick Take
2024-03-31
Deep and diverse: Welcome to today’s Asia credit market
Two of our Singapore-based experts on Asia credit discuss the market's key features, along with how it's evolved and is likely to continue doing so.
Whitepaper
2024-03-31
SVB collapse: What are the implications?
Multi-Asset Strategist Supriya Menon shares her latest perspectives on the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank Financial Group (SVB) and the unfolding implications for investors. (Published 14 March 2023)
Quick Take
2024-03-31
Decoding the effects of deglobalization
Nicholas Petrucelli outlines the economic, political, and geopolitical underpinnings of deglobalization. He also demonstrates the impact this trend has today and analyzes the investment implications.
Quick Take
2024-03-31
What does the new macro regime mean for investors?
In this Q&A with two senior market practitioners we explore what the new macro regime means for investors and what to expect next.
Article
2024-03-31
URL References
Related Insights