Rising short-termism in fintech has a silver lining

Matt Ross, CFA, Global Industry Analyst

The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed.

Question: Could rising short-termism actually provide an alpha opportunity for longer-term-oriented equity investors? Ironically, yes in my view. Let’s look at today’s financial technology (fintech) sector as an example.

Froth in fintech IPOs

I’m concerned about growing froth in the fintech initial public offering (IPO) market because much of the recent activity there signals that investors are continuing to take on more and more risk in pursuit of hoped-for near-term rewards. Here are some behaviors that, to me, highlight the potential for endemic short-termism among fintech market participants:

  • Revenue growth rates alone are driving valuations, with no connection between IPO prices and future expectations of unit economics, profit margins, and such.
  • From where I sit, there doesn’t seem to be much focus at all on the longer-term defensibility and sustainability of company growth.
  • Everything is being valued based on “comps,” which are generally baskets of stocks that are trading at all-time high relative valuations.

The “greater fool” theory

One of my colleagues, Multi-Asset Strategist Adam Berger, has published research focused on the merits of having a long-range investment orientation and a healthy dose of patience. One of his essential takeaways: “For asset owners, the key to success as a long-term investor is not being swayed by short-term events — asset owners should cultivate patience.”

That is easier said than done for most investors and, for many, appears to be particularly difficult to pull off in the current “meme-stock” era. The more capital markets democratize and the news cycle accelerates, the more markets appear to be moving on short-sighted data points rather than a fundamentally rooted understanding of the longer-term story. This puts pressure on many asset owners to compromise their research-driven convictions and “follow the herd.” 

One example of how great this pressure has become: In an April 2021 survey of US individual investors by the Yale International Center for Finance, 67% of respondents said they thought the stock market was too high. But 76% said they also believed the market would rise over the next year. The “greater fool” theory appears to be pervasive in today’s market, suggesting that the short-termism described above is not confined to fintech investors.

The long-term opportunity

As I see it, the outperformance opportunity for long-term investors here is two-fold:

1) Maintaining a long-term perspective in the face of rampant short-termism can help asset owners mitigate downside risk by limiting their exposure to assets that have been overinflated by that short-termism.

2) A disciplined, buy-and-hold approach could help patient investors accumulate positions in quality assets whose long-term performance prospects may be largely underappreciated by the broader market.

The fintech sector is a microcosm of this long-term opportunity. The growth potential is tremendous, yet arguably no tech frontier demands investor patience and deep research more than fintech. Three key forces look poised to challenge short-term assumptions about long-term outcomes and generate opportunity for patient fintech investors:

1) Incumbents will fight for their stake in the fintech future. From banks to credit card networks to scale processors, incumbents are trying to “out-innovate” the innovators or, at the least, leverage their size and scale to hold back insurgents. As of this writing, I think many incumbents look undervalued relative to their upstart competitors, despite obvious advantages.

2) The fintech ecosystem is fractured and ripe for consolidation. As we’ve seen recently, industry consolidation can swiftly alter investor perceptions and cause fintech assets to reprice. With fintech M&A activity clearly on the rise, predicting and analysing this activity will become increasingly important as the ecosystem matures and network effects intensify.

3) The regulatory landscape remains murky.  Regulatory actions by the SEC or other government agencies could stifle or even derail some fintech companies’ business models. It is therefore imperative, in my judgment, that fintech investors consider regulatory risk in their long-term estimation of a company’s growth trajectory.

Final thoughts

Beyond fintech, investors’ recurring tendency toward short-termism has long been evident across market sectors and asset classes, at times pushing prices to unsustainable heights. To paraphrase Bill Gates: “People often overestimate what will happen in the next two years and underestimate what will happen in the next 10 years.” Patient, discriminating investors could be well positioned to harness that longer-term upside, while potentially minimizing exposure to short-term asset mispricings.

Authored by
Matthew Ross
Matt Ross, CFA
Global Industry Analyst
Boston, USA


Next Generation Global Equity Fund

Thematic global equity fund focused on sustainable development themes, using risk-weighted portfolio construction.

View Details



Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results and an investment can lose value. Funds returns are shown net of fees.
Source: Wellington Management

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. The Overall Morningstar Rating for a fund is derived from a weighted average of the three, five, and ten year (if applicable) ratings, based on risk-adjusted return. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The content within this page is issued by Wellington Management Singapore Pte Ltd (UEN: 201415544E) (WMS). This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Information contained on this website is provided for information purposes and does not constitute financial advice or recommendation in any security including but not limited to, share in the funds and is prepared without regard to the specific objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular person.

Investment in the funds described on this website carries a substantial degree of risk and places an investor’s capital at risk.  The price and value of investments is not guaranteed and may fall or rise. An investor may not get back the original amount invested and an investor may lose all of their investment. Investment in the funds described on this website is not suitable for all investors. Investors should read the prospectus and the Product Highlights Sheet of the respective fund and seek financial advice before deciding whether to purchase shares in any fund. Past performance or any economic trends or forecast, are not necessarily indicative of future performance. Some of the funds described on this website may use or invest in financial derivative instruments for portfolio management and hedging purposes. Investments in the funds are subject to investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. None of the funds listed on this website guarantees distributions and distributions may fluctuate and may be paid out of capital. Past distributions are not necessarily indicative of future trends, which may be lower. Please note that payment of distributions out of capital effectively amounts to a return or withdrawal of the principal amount invested or of net capital gains attributable to that principal amount. Actual distribution of income, net capital gains and/or capital will be at the manager’s absolute discretion. Payments on dividends may result in a reduction of NAV per share of the funds. The preceding paragraph is only applicable if the fund intends to pay dividends/ distributions.  Performance with preliminary charge (sales charge) is calculated on a NAV to NAV basis, net of 5% preliminary charge (initial sales charge). Unless stated otherwise data is as at previous month end.

Subscriptions may only be made on the basis of the latest prospectus and Product Highlights Sheet, and they can be obtained from WMS or fund distributors upon request.

This material may not be reproduced or distributed, in whole or in part, without the express written consent of Wellington Management.