- About Us
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed.
The recently announced intended merger of two key financial technology (fintech) players will be the second-largest deal ever in the global payments sector. Here’s my latest perspective on the broader implications of this major acquisition and the related investment opportunity in the fast-growing “buy now, pay later (BNPL)” space, which I believe has now reached an inflection point in its young storyline.
Given the size of the total addressable market (TAM) for global payments, I’d say fintech companies have been little more than a thorn in the sides of the old guard thus far, but I think that’s poised to change. Indeed, I believe the recent blockbuster transaction noted above may have transformative power for the industry.
This could mark the onset of a new era in which the modern fintech platforms scale aggressively and “take on” the incumbent banks and legacy payments processors in a way that poses a legitimate competitive threat and begins to reshape the industry landscape. Looking across both the public and private markets, I wouldn’t even be surprised if the impact of this shift starts showing up in some of the telling numbers — the trillions of dollars in global market capitalization, payment volumes, and loan receivables currently controlled by traditional financials, but for which well-placed up-and-coming BNPL companies will now be competing.
The TAM for online payments is roughly US$10 trillion worldwide today, with BNPL operators currently holding less than 2% of that total. However, I think BNPL’s market share could surge to around 10% of online payments by 2025 or 2026. The five biggest BNPL players are already growing their volumes four to five times faster than much of the global e-commerce industry. In my view, these swift growth rates and likely market share gains accrue from a potent combination of trends: changing consumer appetites and habits, cheaper and easier access to credit, and better online customer “checkout” experiences.
Consumer tastes and preferences are increasingly gravitating from taking on revolving credit to making purchases via installment debt. BNPL companies allow consumers to “stretch” payables from 30 days (the typical “free revolve” period on a credit card) to 60 days up to three years with no interest charges, and under certain circumstances, no late-payment fees either. In addition, BNPL companies operate on modern technology stacks with secure, seamless, and integrated checkout processes that are mobile and app-native, making it a smoother (and safer) ride for consumers to buy products online. Of course, convenience is key as well.
Potential downsides versus traditional payment offerings? There’s often a relatively small credit limit — as low as a US$500 maximum outstanding balance in some instances. BNPL operators typically do not report to credit bureaus, so it’s not the best way for consumers to build or improve credit scores. On the merchant side, take rates1 are about twice as high as traditional credit/debit interchanges, but conversion rates also tend to be high. A/B tests I’ve seen suggest merchants can boost checkout conversion meaningfully with a BNPL service.
Bottom line: For most consumers, the positives clearly outweigh the negatives, making BNPL a rapidly expanding category with tremendous upside, in my judgment. And particularly for businesses with gross profit margins of greater than 20%, BNPL can be a very effective tool.
So why hasn’t BNPL been front and center with most payments investors (not yet anyway)? Most investors seem skeptical because many of these businesses are growing at breakneck speeds, while potentially inviting credit risk and unwanted industry regulation. At this point, I would cite regulatory risk as my chief concern. Given the duration and size of most BNPL firms’ receivables, credit risk is much less worrisome to me.
To me, recent developments have strengthened my thesis that BNPL cannot and should not be ignored — and that legacy payments players that fail to take it seriously do so at their own peril.
1A merchant take rate is the fee charged on a transaction performed by a third-party seller or service provider on behalf of the merchant.
Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results and an investment can lose value. Funds returns are shown net of fees.
Source: Wellington Management
© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. The Overall Morningstar Rating for a fund is derived from a weighted average of the three, five, and ten year (if applicable) ratings, based on risk-adjusted return. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
The content within this page is issued by Wellington Management Singapore Pte Ltd (UEN: 201415544E) (WMS). This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Information contained on this website is provided for information purposes and does not constitute financial advice or recommendation in any security including but not limited to, share in the funds and is prepared without regard to the specific objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular person.
Investment in the funds described on this website carries a substantial degree of risk and places an investor’s capital at risk. The price and value of investments is not guaranteed and may fall or rise. An investor may not get back the original amount invested and an investor may lose all of their investment. Investment in the funds described on this website is not suitable for all investors. Investors should read the prospectus and the Product Highlights Sheet of the respective fund and seek financial advice before deciding whether to purchase shares in any fund. Past performance or any economic trends or forecast, are not necessarily indicative of future performance. Some of the funds described on this website may use or invest in financial derivative instruments for portfolio management and hedging purposes. Investments in the funds are subject to investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. None of the funds listed on this website guarantees distributions and distributions may fluctuate and may be paid out of capital. Past distributions are not necessarily indicative of future trends, which may be lower. Please note that payment of distributions out of capital effectively amounts to a return or withdrawal of the principal amount invested or of net capital gains attributable to that principal amount. Actual distribution of income, net capital gains and/or capital will be at the manager’s absolute discretion. Payments on dividends may result in a reduction of NAV per share of the funds. The preceding paragraph is only applicable if the fund intends to pay dividends/ distributions. Performance with preliminary charge (sales charge) is calculated on a NAV to NAV basis, net of 5% preliminary charge (initial sales charge). Unless stated otherwise data is as at previous month end.
Subscriptions may only be made on the basis of the latest prospectus and Product Highlights Sheet, and they can be obtained from WMS or fund distributors upon request.
This material may not be reproduced or distributed, in whole or in part, without the express written consent of Wellington Management.