We continue to view AI positively, with the massive investments being made providing a near-term boost to the economy and potentially driving even more meaningful long-term productivity gains. Despite the investments required, the largest tech companies have been able to generate strong cash flows and maintain high margins.
Why aren’t we more positive given these drivers? Valuations have risen, particularly in non-US markets with weaker earnings growth, and uncertainty remains high on several policy fronts in the US and elsewhere, including around issues of fiscal sustainability, monetary policy independence, and regulatory and industrial policies.
We have moved our view on the US from moderately underweight to moderately overweight. While gains have been limited to a relatively narrow group of mega caps and large AI names, we see some signs of a broadening EPS recovery as Fed cuts support small caps and value segments. In addition, lower corporate taxes, higher levels of investment, productivity gains, and deregulation seem likely to help some of the laggards. We would see any market broadening as a positive. While the market is richly valued, that is in line with a high return on equity, and earnings are still being delivered. On the earnings side, the US is clearly ahead of other regions, with a sharp recovery in both the number and breadth of revisions across companies.
We maintain our moderately overweight view on Japanese equities. Corporate governance reforms and restructuring continue to provide a tailwind, and buybacks are at record highs (and still rising). That, combined with a relatively high dividend yield, translates to a high cash return to shareholders. This has pulled in foreign investors, who flipped from net sellers to net buyers in the middle of the second quarter. However, positioning is still not stretched. At the macro level, ongoing reflation is a positive for Japanese equities. Despite strong nominal GDP, monetary conditions remain loose even with a potential rate hike later in the year. Valuations have turned less supportive as the market has undergone a re-rating the past few months.
We have lowered our view on Europe ex-UK and the UK from neutral to moderately underweight, mainly because of weak earnings prospects. The lack of earnings growth indicates that recent gains in Europe ex-UK have been valuation-driven, which means the region is no longer cheap or unloved. EPS for 2025 and 2026 have not recovered, and both Europe ex-UK and the UK are lagging on company revisions and breadth. Optimism around German fiscal support is justified and there should be an impact in terms of stock-level winners and losers, particularly among German small/mid-caps, defense, and infrastructure, but we think the broad market impact is likely to be limited. We also see a growing divide between Europe’s periphery, which shows stronger macro fundamentals, and the core, which suffers from challenges in key industries (such as autos) and the impact of a strong euro on exporting industries. For its part, the UK suffers from an absence of tech exposure and from its domestic economic and policy reliance. While earnings showed signs of a recovery over the last few months, they are now weakening again.
We maintain our neutral view on EM, particularly after a powerful rally driven by valuation expansion. Lower US rates, a weaker US dollar, and stronger risk appetites all support EM. However, much of the move has been sentiment-driven, with earnings not improving. Even in China, neither macroeconomic nor earnings fundamentals are improving, although optimism on AI and tech innovation seems partly justified.
Sector-wise, a variety of factors — whether earnings-, technical-, or valuation-driven — are shaping our preferences, rather than any strong overarching theme. We have an overweight view on communications, staples, and utilities, and an underweight view on materials, health care, and industrials. We have a neutral view on technology and financials.
Monthly Market Review — October 2025
Continue readingBy