- Geopolitical Strategist
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional or accredited investors only.
Though it sometimes feels like historic headlines are being printed every day, the recent gathering of several world leaders may one day be viewed by historians as a true turning point in 21st-century geopolitics. I’m talking, of course, about the Victory Day parade in Beijing marking the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II.
This event was a highly visible opportunity for President Xi Jinping to stand shoulder to shoulder with Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un as China unveiled powerful new military weapons ranging from advanced drones and fighter jets to hypersonic missiles and new intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of reaching the US homeland. Crucially from a geopolitical perspective, the meeting also included India’s leader Narendra Modi (though he ducked out before the military parade began).
Beijing is signaling to the world — and to Washington, DC in particular — that it now has both the military might and diplomatic sway to push back on the US and the US-led international order that has prevented great-power conflict over the past eight decades.
The timing matters. President Xi is looking to counter US President Donald Trump’s deeply divisive global trade and tariffs agenda, which has strained US relations with almost every traditional US ally around the world and, in particular, its emerging alliance with China’s top regional rival, India.
Beijing is also attempting to project an alternative to decades of US geopolitical dominance (which Xi has termed “hegemonism and power politics”), particularly across the Global South, where many countries feel threatened by US policy changes.
Investors should take note of this headline event. These geopolitical developments are indicative of a broader and highly consequential structural shift in the world order. This suggests a rising probability of global policy friction and, in a worst-case scenario, great-power military conflict.
This rapidly fracturing and increasingly dangerous global order will likely accelerate global policymakers’ focus on national security across the board, often at the expense of economic efficiency — potentially leading to structurally higher inflation and lower economic growth than we saw during the heyday of globalization.
These responses will likely include making defense spending and the reconstitution of domestic industrial bases even higher priorities. This dynamic will also likely lead to more protection and promotion of strategic sectors central to great-power competition, especially those — like artificial intelligence — with the potential to produce outsized geostrategic benefits.
All of this coming disruption at the regional, country, industry, company, and asset-class levels will likely create more winners and losers from an investment perspective. This could be a potential boon for actively managed strategies, including long/short approaches.
It will also likely spur new demand tailwinds for long-term investment themes focusing on national security, including legacy defense, defense innovation, as well as climate adaptation and decarbonization — many of which can be found in both private and public markets.
A key takeaway here is that paying close attention to what these rapid shifts portend in Beijing, Washington, New Delhi, Moscow, and elsewhere is a crucial piece of understanding today’s increasingly complex investment mosaic. Investors who wish to stay informed of today’s biggest risks and opportunities may do well to maintain a geopolitical view.
Expert
The rally: Refusing to yield?
Continue readingOil is the spark — the cost of capital is the story
Continue readingThe most important midterm question?
Continue reading2026 midyear geopolitical update: What “structural competition” means for investors
Continue readingIran ceasefire – risk deferred, not removed
Continue readingOne battle after another: Time to reset expectations?
Continue readingInvestment implications of the conflict in the Middle East
Continue readingURL References
Related Insights
The rally: Refusing to yield?
Find out why we remain constructive but increasingly selective as AI investment supports equities, rising yields create opportunities in government bonds, and geopolitical risks complicate the outlook.
Oil is the spark — the cost of capital is the story
Higher oil prices are refocusing markets on inflation and the Fed, but the bigger investment story may be a broader shift toward a higher cost of capital and new diversification challenges.
The most important midterm question?
As the mid-term elections approach, the things the election won't change may matter more than who wins and who loses.
2026 midyear geopolitical update: What “structural competition” means for investors
Our expert explores how structural geopolitical competition is reshaping markets, raising risk premiums, and creating long-term investment implications across defense, energy, technology, supply chains, sovereign credibility, and portfolio resilience.
Iran ceasefire – risk deferred, not removed
The US and Iran have announced a two-week ceasefire. While this reduces immediate tail risk, Geopolitical Strategist Thomas Mucha cautions against mistaking it for a resolution. What should investors be watching now?
One battle after another: Time to reset expectations?
How might the historic energy shock impact portfolio decisions in the coming months? We offer our take on the implications for equities, bonds, and commodities.
Investment implications of the conflict in the Middle East
Geopolitical Strategist Thomas Mucha discusses the strategic complexities of the Middle East conflict, underscoring the importance of active management and diversification in investment portfolios.
Investment insights on the Middle East: A roundtable discussion
In a special roundtable discussion, our investment experts discuss the Middle East crisis, including geopolitical developments, energy prices, emerging markets, and multi-asset implications.
Multiple authors
Perspectives on the Middle East conflict
As the situation in the Middle East continues to unfold, you can find the latest insights from our investment experts here.
Multiple authors
The soft underbelly of US foreign policy
Our experts discuss the US-EU financial dynamics amid Greenland tensions and analyze US foreign policy's vulnerabilities.
Oil: The real influencer in the Venezuela intervention
Multi-asset Strategist Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson details the role of oil in the recent events in Venezuela and shares the investment implications.
URL References
Related Insights